共找到 20 条结果
暂无摘要（点击查看详情）
Timely and comprehensive analyses of causes of death stratified by age, sex, and location are essential for shaping effective health policies aimed at reducing global mortality. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023 provides cause-specific mortality estimates measured in counts, rates, and years of life lost (YLLs). GBD 2023 aimed to enhance our understanding of the relationship between age and cause of death by quantifying the probability of dying before age 70 years (70q0) and the mean age at death by cause and sex. This study enables comparisons of the impact of causes of death over time, offering a deeper understanding of how these causes affect global populations. GBD 2023 produced estimates for 292 causes of death disaggregated by age-sex-location-year in 204 countries and territories and 660 subnational locations for each year from 1990 until 2023. We used a modelling tool developed for GBD, the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), to estimate cause-specific death rates for most causes. We computed YLLs as the product of the number of deaths for each cause-age-sex-location-year and the standard life expectancy at each age. Probability of death was calculated as the chance of dying from a given cause in a specific age period, for a specific population. Mean age at death was calculated by first assigning the midpoint age of each age group for every death, followed by computing the mean of all midpoint ages across all deaths attributed to a given cause. We used GBD death estimates to calculate the observed mean age at death and to model the expected mean age across causes, sexes, years, and locations. The expected mean age reflects the expected mean age at death for individuals within a population, based on global mortality rates and the population's age structure. Comparatively, the observed mean age represents the actual mean age at death, influenced by all factors unique to a location-specific population, including its age structure. As part of the modelling process, uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated using the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles from a 250-draw distribution for each metric. Findings are reported as counts and age-standardised rates. Methodological improvements for cause-of-death estimates in GBD 2023 include a correction for the misclassification of deaths due to COVID-19, updates to the method used to estimate COVID-19, and updates to the CODEm modelling framework. This analysis used 55 761 data sources, including vital registration and verbal autopsy data as well as data from surveys, censuses, surveillance systems, and cancer registries, among others. For GBD 2023, there were 312 new country-years of vital registration cause-of-death data, 3 country-years of surveillance data, 51 country-years of verbal autopsy data, and 144 country-years of other data types that were added to those used in previous GBD rounds. The initial years of the COVID-19 pandemic caused shifts in long-standing rankings of the leading causes of global deaths: it ranked as the number one age-standardised cause of death at Level 3 of the GBD cause classification hierarchy in 2021. By 2023, COVID-19 dropped to the 20th place among the leading global causes, returning the rankings of the leading two causes to those typical across the time series (ie, ischaemic heart disease and stroke). While ischaemic heart disease and stroke persist as leading causes of death, there has been progress in reducing their age-standardised mortality rates globally. Four other leading causes have also shown large declines in global age-standardised mortality rates across the study period: diarrhoeal diseases, tuberculosis, stomach cancer, and measles. Other causes of death showed disparate patterns between sexes, notably for deaths from conflict and terrorism in some locations. A large reduction in age-standardised rates of YLLs occurred for neonatal disorders. Despite this, neonatal disorders remained the leading cause of global YLLs over the period studied, except in 2021, when COVID-19 was temporarily the leading cause. Compared to 1990, there has been a considerable reduction in total YLLs in many vaccine-preventable diseases, most notably diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and measles. In addition, this study quantified the mean age at death for all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality and found noticeable variation by sex and location. The global all-cause mean age at death increased from 46·8 years (95% UI 46·6-47·0) in 1990 to 63·4 years (63·1-63·7) in 2023. For males, mean age increased from 45·4 years (45·1-45·7) to 61·2 years (60·7-61·6), and for females it increased from 48·5 years (48·1-48·8) to 65·9 years (65·5-66·3), from 1990 to 2023. The highest all-cause mean age at death in 2023 was found in the high-income super-region, where the mean age for females reached 80·9 years (80·9-81·0) and for males 74·8 years (74·8-74·9). By comparison, the lowest all-cause mean age at death occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, where it was 38·0 years (37·5-38·4) for females and 35·6 years (35·2-35·9) for males in 2023. Lastly, our study found that all-cause 70q0 decreased across each GBD super-region and region from 2000 to 2023, although with large variability between them. For females, we found that 70q0 notably increased from drug use disorders and conflict and terrorism. Leading causes that increased 70q0 for males also included drug use disorders, as well as diabetes. In sub-Saharan Africa, there was an increase in 70q0 for many non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Additionally, the mean age at death from NCDs was lower than the expected mean age at death for this super-region. By comparison, there was an increase in 70q0 for drug use disorders in the high-income super-region, which also had an observed mean age at death lower than the expected value. We examined global mortality patterns over the past three decades, highlighting-with enhanced estimation methods-the impacts of major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to broader trends such as increasing NCDs in low-income regions that reflect ongoing shifts in the global epidemiological transition. This study also delves into premature mortality patterns, exploring the interplay between age and causes of death and deepening our understanding of where targeted resources could be applied to further reduce preventable sources of mortality. We provide essential insights into global and regional health disparities, identifying locations in need of targeted interventions to address both communicable and non-communicable diseases. There is an ever-present need for strengthened health-care systems that are resilient to future pandemics and the shifting burden of disease, particularly among ageing populations in regions with high mortality rates. Robust estimates of causes of death are increasingly essential to inform health priorities and guide efforts toward achieving global health equity. The need for global collaboration to reduce preventable mortality is more important than ever, as shifting burdens of disease are affecting all nations, albeit at different paces and scales. Gates Foundation.
Clinical complexity and limitations of available evidence make cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) in phenylketonuria (PKU) challenging, with no consensus model structure emerging from historical CEAs. This research aimed to elicit perspectives from PKU medical experts regarding approaches for CEA modeling, to inform development of a face-validated model structure. In a modified e-Delphi study, clinical experts rated their agreement/disagreement with 14 statements on clinical outcomes, diet, target population, blood phenylalanine (Phe)-level classification, and treatment discontinuation. Separately, a survey of a broader sample of experts elicited perspectives on the prevalence of PKU comorbidities, and biological plausibility of the association of surrogate outcomes with comorbidity risk. Insights informed development of the conceptual structure and parameters for a CEA model. In the modified e-Delphi study, participants (N = 11) achieved consensus (≥ 70% agreement/disagreement) on statements on the associations of blood Phe levels with outcomes, unmet need, mechanisms for the association of PKU with chronic comorbidities, and medical management approaches. In the survey (N = 30), ≥ 70% of participants agreed that prevalence of comorbidities is higher in PKU vs. the general population, and that increased natural-protein consumption may reduce comorbidity risk, including for depression, osteoporosis, overweight, anemia, and type two diabetes mellitus. Findings informed development of a CEA model structure comprising five blood Phe level-defined health states (range: ≤120 µmol/L to > 1200 µmol/L), associated with four classes of patient-relevant clinical outcomes in PKU: contemporaneous symptoms/manifestations, intellectual disability, comorbidities, and diet liberalization. In this research, perspectives were elicited from medical experts in PKU to develop a clinically informed, face-validated conceptual model structure for CEA, and to identify associated parameters. The resulting de novo economic model allows for valuation of numerous important patient-relevant outcomes, enabling modeling of the heterogeneous drivers of unmet need in PKU. The structured expert-elicitation approach used in this research, and documentation of the influence of perspectives elicited on model structure and parameters, support the validity of the model for application in economic evaluation of interventions for PKU.
Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent malignancies globally and causes massive resource consumption and economic burden. Health economic evidence (HEE) has been used in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cancer to facilitate the rational allocation of health resources. However, in certain guideline development organizations, HEE is not yet utilized as a formal decision-making criterion. This study aimed to compare the discrepancies in the utilization of health economics as evidence in CRC CPGs across different countries and review specific features of economic evidence concerning the guidelines' applicability. Materials & methods: A systematic review was conducted using databases including Medline, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, and other guidelines databases to identify CPGs for CRC published in English or Chinese from January 2017 to September 2023. Data on the incorporation and application of HEE were extracted, and the method and quality of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies were evaluated. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize the results. Results: Out of 53 CPGs from 14 countries, most originated from the USA (n = 17 of 53 [32%]) and Canada (n = 9 of 53 [17%]). Sixty-eight percent (36/53) considered cost justification, and 57% (30/53) incorporated health economics studies as evidence. The included HEE cited in CPGs ranged from 1990 to 2021 and were not aligned with the countries in which the guidelines were issued. Among these CEA studies, 52% (26/50) were related to screening strategies, and 32% (16/50) pertained to treatment measures. The Markov model was the most frequently used (n = 27 of 50 [54%]). Based on the CHEQUE tool, the methodological quality of these CEA studies was inadequate in areas such as multiple data sources, approaches to select data sources, assessing the quality of data, and relevant equity or distribution. Conclusion: In summary, 57% of guidelines incorporated health economics studies as evidence, with a variation between different countries. The included HEE still had deficiencies in methodology and reporting quality. In the future, it is suggested that health economics research should use a standardized methodology and reporting approach to assist in clinical decision making. What is this article about? Based on healthcare evidence and expert opinion, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are an important reference to help healthcare practitioners make scientific decisions. The inclusion of health economic evidence (HEE) in CPGs promotes the efficient utilization of health resources. This study aims to evaluate whether HEE was considered in developing CPGs of colorectal cancer across different countries and review the applicability, methodology, and quality of these health economics studies. What were the results? We included 53 CPGs and extracted 80 HEE studies from them, including 50 cost–effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies. The application of HEE in CPGs showed discrepancies between different countries and medical associations. HEE research contributed to cost-based de-escalation of treatment strategies, reporting the economic burden of the disease and elucidating the health-economic comparative benefits of the intervention. Based on the CHEQUE evaluation tool, the methodological and reporting quality of these CEA studies cited as references demonstrated deficiencies. What do the results mean? The incorporation of HEE into CPGs as a form of supporting evidence still varies globally. In addition, guidelines tend to ignore the applicability of results from a single HEE. The integration of HEE into CPGs remains challenging.
The growing population of cancer survivors faces persistent physical and emotional challenges that significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQL). To address these multifaceted needs, robust and culturally adapted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCaW) questionnaire, are essential for understanding and improving survivors' subjective experiences. This protocol aimed to outline the systematic translation and cultural adaptation of the MYCaW questionnaire into German. The MYCaW questionnaire, a PROM, is designed to capture individualized concerns and assess overall well-being, particularly in cancer care settings. By adhering to common guidelines, this research will provide a tool for assessing individualized concerns and patient needs among German-speaking patients with cancer. Following International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines, this study will use a structured methodology involving forward and backward translation, expert review, patient review process, and preliminary validation to ensure linguistic and cultural equivalence. This study is approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Association Berlin (reference Eth-27/10). Construct validity will be assessed through comparison with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the MIDOS (Minimal Documentation System; in German: Minimales Dokumentationssystem) questionnaire, to evaluate both quality of life and symptom burden. Funding of the study was obtained in January 2023. Patient recruitment started in the first quarter of 2023, and the cognitive debriefing phase is ongoing. Validation with the larger patient sample (N=120) is scheduled to conclude in the fourth quarter of 2025, with publication of the study results anticipated in the first quarter of 2026. The adaptation process will include translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing with patients and health care professionals to ensure linguistic clarity and cultural relevance. The translation and adaptation of MYCaW into German will contribute to expanding the availability of validated PROMs for German-speaking populations. By following rigorous international guidelines, this study aims to produce a reliable, culturally appropriate, and linguistically adapted German version of the MYCaW questionnaire for assessing patient concerns and well-being in oncology and supportive care settings. Future validation studies will be necessary to assess the psychometric properties of the adapted questionnaire and its applicability in clinical and research contexts. Potential challenges, such as maintaining conceptual equivalence in translation and ensuring broad representativeness in the validation process, will be addressed through iterative refinement. Once validated, the German MYCaW will provide a valuable resource for patient-centered research and care, helping to capture individualized concerns that might be overlooked by standardized instruments.
For more than three decades, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) has provided a framework to quantify health loss due to diseases, injuries, and associated risk factors. This paper presents GBD 2023 findings on disease and injury burden and risk-attributable health loss, offering a global audit of the state of world health to inform public health priorities. This work captures the evolving landscape of health metrics across age groups, sexes, and locations, while reflecting on the remaining post-COVID-19 challenges to achieving our collective global health ambitions. The GBD 2023 combined analysis estimated years lived with disability (YLDs), years of life lost (YLLs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 375 diseases and injuries, and risk-attributable burden associated with 88 modifiable risk factors. Of the more than 310 000 total data sources used for all GBD 2023 (about 30% of which were new to this estimation round), more than 120 000 sources were used for estimation of disease and injury burden and 59 000 for risk factor estimation, and included vital registration systems, surveys, disease registries, and published scientific literature. Data were analysed using previously established modelling approaches, such as disease modelling meta-regression version 2.1 (DisMod-MR 2.1) and comparative risk assessment methods. Diseases and injuries were categorised into four levels on the basis of the established GBD cause hierarchy, as were risk factors using the GBD risk hierarchy. Estimates stratified by age, sex, location, and year from 1990 to 2023 were focused on disease-specific time trends over the 2010-23 period and presented as counts (to three significant figures) and age-standardised rates per 100 000 person-years (to one decimal place). For each measure, 95% uncertainty intervals [UIs] were calculated with the 2·5th and 97·5th percentile ordered values from a 250-draw distribution. Total numbers of global DALYs grew 6·1% (95% UI 4·0-8·1), from 2·64 billion (2·46-2·86) in 2010 to 2·80 billion (2·57-3·08) in 2023, but age-standardised DALY rates, which account for population growth and ageing, decreased by 12·6% (11·0-14·1), revealing large long-term health improvements. Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) contributed 1·45 billion (1·31-1·61) global DALYs in 2010, increasing to 1·80 billion (1·63-2·03) in 2023, alongside a concurrent 4·1% (1·9-6·3) reduction in age-standardised rates. Based on DALY counts, the leading level 3 NCDs in 2023 were ischaemic heart disease (193 million [176-209] DALYs), stroke (157 million [141-172]), and diabetes (90·2 million [75·2-107]), with the largest increases in age-standardised rates since 2010 occurring for anxiety disorders (62·8% [34·0-107·5]), depressive disorders (26·3% [11·6-42·9]), and diabetes (14·9% [7·5-25·6]). Remarkable health gains were made for communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional (CMNN) diseases, with DALYs falling from 874 million (837-917) in 2010 to 681 million (642-736) in 2023, and a 25·8% (22·6-28·7) reduction in age-standardised DALY rates. During the COVID-19 pandemic, DALYs due to CMNN diseases rose but returned to pre-pandemic levels by 2023. From 2010 to 2023, decreases in age-standardised rates for CMNN diseases were led by rate decreases of 49·1% (32·7-61·0) for diarrhoeal diseases, 42·9% (38·0-48·0) for HIV/AIDS, and 42·2% (23·6-56·6) for tuberculosis. Neonatal disorders and lower respiratory infections remained the leading level 3 CMNN causes globally in 2023, although both showed notable rate decreases from 2010, declining by 16·5% (10·6-22·0) and 24·8% (7·4-36·7), respectively. Injury-related age-standardised DALY rates decreased by 15·6% (10·7-19·8) over the same period. Differences in burden due to NCDs, CMNN diseases, and injuries persisted across age, sex, time, and location. Based on our risk analysis, nearly 50% (1·27 billion [1·18-1·38]) of the roughly 2·80 billion total global DALYs in 2023 were attributable to the 88 risk factors analysed in GBD. Globally, the five level 3 risk factors contributing the highest proportion of risk-attributable DALYs were high systolic blood pressure (SBP), particulate matter pollution, high fasting plasma glucose (FPG), smoking, and low birthweight and short gestation-with high SBP accounting for 8·4% (6·9-10·0) of total DALYs. Of the three overarching level 1 GBD risk factor categories-behavioural, metabolic, and environmental and occupational-risk-attributable DALYs rose between 2010 and 2023 only for metabolic risks, increasing by 30·7% (24·8-37·3); however, age-standardised DALY rates attributable to metabolic risks decreased by 6·7% (2·0-11·0) over the same period. For all but three of the 25 leading level 3 risk factors, age-standardised rates dropped between 2010 and 2023-eg, declining by 54·4% (38·7-65·3) for unsafe sanitation, 50·5% (33·3-63·1) for unsafe water source, and 45·2% (25·6-72·0) for no access to handwashing facility, and by 44·9% (37·3-53·5) for child growth failure. The three leading level 3 risk factors for which age-standardised attributable DALY rates rose were high BMI (10·5% [0·1 to 20·9]), drug use (8·4% [2·6 to 15·3]), and high FPG (6·2% [-2·7 to 15·6]; non-significant). Our findings underscore the complex and dynamic nature of global health challenges. Since 2010, there have been large decreases in burden due to CMNN diseases and many environmental and behavioural risk factors, juxtaposed with sizeable increases in DALYs attributable to metabolic risk factors and NCDs in growing and ageing populations. This long-observed consequence of the global epidemiological transition was only temporarily interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The substantially decreasing CMNN disease burden, despite the 2008 global financial crisis and pandemic-related disruptions, is one of the greatest collective public health successes known. However, these achievements are at risk of being reversed due to major cuts to development assistance for health globally, the effects of which will hit low-income countries with high burden the hardest. Without sustained investment in evidence-based interventions and policies, progress could stall or reverse, leading to widespread human costs and geopolitical instability. Moreover, the rising NCD burden necessitates intensified efforts to mitigate exposure to leading risk factors-eg, air pollution, smoking, and metabolic risks, such as high SBP, BMI, and FPG-including policies that promote food security, healthier diets, physical activity, and equitable and expanded access to potential treatments, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists. Decisive, coordinated action is needed to address long-standing yet growing health challenges, including depressive and anxiety disorders. Yet this can be only part of the solution. Our response to the NCD syndemic-the complex interaction of multiple health risks, social determinants, and systemic challenges-will define the future landscape of global health. To ensure human wellbeing, economic stability, and social equity, global action to sustain and advance health gains must prioritise reducing disparities by addressing socioeconomic and demographic determinants, ensuring equitable health-care access, tackling malnutrition, strengthening health systems, and improving vaccination coverage. We live in times of great opportunity. Gates Foundation and Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Value-based healthcare (VBHC) aims to improve patient outcomes relative to the costs of delivering care; yet, its implementation has often evolved separately from the methodological rigor of health economics and outcomes research (HEOR). This ISPOR Special Task Force report provides good practice recommendations for integrating HEOR methods into VBHC implementation to enhance analytic transparency, patient-centeredness, and value measurement across healthcare systems. A mixed-methods approach combined a targeted literature review (109 studies), semistructured interviews with 24 international experts, and a structured survey of a 9-member Expert Advisory Board. The review covered conceptual, white, and empirical articles exploring intersections between VBHC and HEOR, whereas qualitative inputs identified methodological gaps and opportunities for synergy. Two-thirds of empirical VBHC studies applied HEOR methods-primarily cost analyses-yet, comprehensive economic evaluations were rare. Experts emphasized that HEOR's strengths in incentive design, costing methodologies, and outcomes evaluation could advance VBHC implementation. Conversely, VBHC's focus on patient-centered outcomes can help HEOR evolve toward greater relevance and impact. The Special Task Force developed actionable recommendations and an "IMPACT" checklist to guide the integration of HEOR methods into VBHC design, implementation, and evaluation. HEOR provides a robust methodological foundation for VBHC by improving measurement of outcomes, costs, and value across care pathways. Aligning these disciplines can foster transparent, evidence-based, and patient-centered healthcare transformation and supporting sustainable, high-value health systems worldwide.
Comprehensive, comparable, and timely estimates of demographic metrics-including life expectancy and age-specific mortality-are essential for evaluating, understanding, and addressing trends in population health. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of timely and all-cause mortality estimates for being able to respond to changing trends in health outcomes, showing a strong need for demographic analysis tools that can produce all-cause mortality estimates more rapidly with more readily available all-age vital registration (VR) data. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) is an ongoing research effort that quantifies human health by estimating a range of epidemiological quantities of interest across time, age, sex, location, cause, and risk. This study-part of the latest GBD release, GBD 2023-aims to provide new and updated estimates of all-cause mortality and life expectancy for 1950 to 2023 using a novel statistical model that accounts for complex correlation structures in demographic data across age and time. We used 24 025 data sources from VR, sample registration, surveys, censuses, and other sources to estimate all-cause mortality for males, females, and all sexes combined across 25 age groups in 204 countries and territories as well as 660 subnational units in 20 countries and territories, for the years 1950-2023. For the first time, we used complete birth history data for ages 5-14 years, age-specific sibling history data for ages 15-49 years, and age-specific mortality data from Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems. We developed a single statistical model that incorporates both parametric and non-parametric methods, referred to as OneMod, to produce estimates of all-cause mortality for each age-sex-location group. OneMod includes two main steps: a detailed regression analysis with a generalised linear modelling tool that accounts for age-specific covariate effects such as the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and a population attributable fraction (PAF) for all risk factors combined; and a non-parametric analysis of residuals using a multivariate kernel regression model that smooths across age and time to adaptably follow trends in the data without overfitting. We calibrated asymptotic uncertainty estimates using Pearson residuals to produce 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) and corresponding 1000 draws. Life expectancy was calculated from age-specific mortality rates with standard demographic methods. For each measure, 95% UIs were calculated with the 25th and 975th ordered values from a 1000-draw posterior distribution. In 2023, 60·1 million (95% UI 59·0-61·1) deaths occurred globally, of which 4·67 million (4·59-4·75) were in children younger than 5 years. Due to considerable population growth and ageing since 1950, the number of annual deaths globally increased by 35·2% (32·2-38·4) over the 1950-2023 study period, during which the global age-standardised all-cause mortality rate declined by 66·6% (65·8-67·3). Trends in age-specific mortality rates between 2011 and 2023 varied by age group and location, with the largest decline in under-5 mortality occurring in east Asia (67·7% decrease); the largest increases in mortality for those aged 5-14 years, 25-29 years, and 30-39 years occurring in high-income North America (11·5%, 31·7%, and 49·9%, respectively); and the largest increases in mortality for those aged 15-19 years and 20-24 years occurring in Eastern Europe (53·9% and 40·1%, respectively). We also identified higher than previously estimated mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa for all sexes combined aged 5-14 years (87·3% higher in GBD 2023 than GBD 2021 on average across countries and territories over the 1950-2021 period) and for females aged 15-29 years (61·2% higher), as well as lower than previously estimated mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa for all sexes combined aged 50 years and older (13·2% lower), reflecting advances in our modelling approach. Global life expectancy followed three distinct trends over the study period. First, between 1950 and 2019, there were considerable improvements, from 51·2 (50·6-51·7) years for females and 47·9 (47·4-48·4) years for males in 1950 to 76·3 (76·2-76·4) years for females and 71·4 (71·3-71·5) years for males in 2019. Second, this period was followed by a decrease in life expectancy during the COVID-19 pandemic, to 74·7 (74·6-74·8) years for females and 69·3 (69·2-69·4) years for males in 2021. Finally, the world experienced a period of post-pandemic recovery in 2022 and 2023, wherein life expectancy generally returned to pre-pandemic (2019) levels in 2023 (76·3 [76·0-76·6] years for females and 71·5 [71·2-71·8] years for males). 194 (95·1%) of 204 countries and territories experienced at least partial post-pandemic recovery in age-standardised mortality rates by 2023, with 61·8% (126 of 204) recovering to or falling below pre-pandemic levels. There were several mortality trajectories during and following the pandemic across countries and territories. Long-term mortality trends also varied considerably between age groups and locations, demonstrating the diverse landscape of health outcomes globally. This analysis identified several key differences in mortality trends from previous estimates, including higher rates of adolescent mortality, higher rates of young adult mortality in females, and lower rates of mortality in older age groups in much of sub-Saharan Africa. The findings also highlight stark differences across countries and territories in the timing and scale of changes in all-cause mortality trends during and following the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-23). Our estimates of evolving trends in mortality and life expectancy across locations, ages, sexes, and SDI levels in recent years as well as over the entire 1950-2023 study period provide crucial information for governments, policy makers, and the public to ensure that health-care systems, economies, and societies are prepared to address the world's health needs, particularly in populations with higher rates of mortality than previously known. The estimates from this study provide a robust framework for GBD and a valuable foundation for policy development, implementation, and evaluation around the world. Gates Foundation.
Well designed pivotal clinical trials can provide robust evidence for the market authorisation of new cancer drugs, whereas lower-quality clinical evidence leads to uncertainty about drug benefits and harms. We aimed to investigate the strength of evidence supporting new cancer drug indications approved in China from 2017 to 2021. In this retrospective analysis, we searched publicly available data from the National Medical Products Administration website to identify pivotal pre-approval efficacy trials supporting all original and supplemental cancer drug indications approved in China from Jan 1, 2017, to Dec 31, 2021. We included small molecules and biologics, and excluded traditional Chinese medicines, prophylactic vaccines, and generic or biosimilar versions of previously approved drugs. We collected trial protocols and publications from ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. The primary outcome was the strength of the supporting pivotal studies, as measured by study design (randomised or single-arm) and quality. For study quality, we evaluated the ability of single-arm trials to minimise bias, measured via the adoption of external control arm and adjusted confounders, and the risk of bias in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), evaluated with the revised Cochrane tool for risk-of-bias assessment. We also used ratio of hazard ratios (RHR) to quantify differences in effect size in RCTs with different risks of bias. We found 77 novel cancer drugs for 86 original and 62 supplemental indications that were approved in China during the study dates, based on data from 205 pivotal studies. 44 (30%) indications were supported by single-arm trials only and 104 (70%) were supported by at least one RCT. Of the 54 pivotal single-arm trials with regulatory review documents, six (11%) used aggregated data from earlier trials as external controls, without adjustment for confounders. Of the 128 pivotal RCTs with published results, 47 (37%) were assessed as having some concern and 48 (38%) as having a high risk of bias. Overall, 149 (82%) of 182 pivotal trials that were assessable for quality had limitations in bias control. RCTs with some concern or high risk of bias in the randomisation process had smaller effect sizes (RHR 0·678 [95% CI 0·532-0·864]), and those with some concern or high risk of bias in missing outcome data had larger effect sizes (1·114 [1·004-1·237]), compared with RCTs with low risk of bias in these domains. Four-fifths of assessable pivotal studies supporting new cancer indication approvals in China from 2017 to 2021 had weaknesses in design, conduct, or reporting that introduced uncertainty to the estimation of treatment effects. To ensure the validity of drug efficacy data and reduce uncertainty, stakeholders should strengthen and implement a high-quality standard on the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of studies supporting regulatory approval of new therapies. National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and their families face existential physical, psychosocial and spiritual distress. Integrating palliative care (PC) into ICU care may benefit patients, relatives and ICU clinicians. Prior PC studies have shown a reduction in ICU length of stay (LOS) and distressing symptoms without altering overall mortality. A shorter ICU LOS may alleviate the burden for patients and relatives and help optimise the use of limited intensive care resources. PC in the ICU, however, remains underused, partly due to limited access and knowledge of ICU clinicians. Also, robust data regarding the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PC treatment in the ICU are scarce. We established the 'enhancing palliative care in ICUs' (EPIC) study to implement a system-based harmonised practice model across European ICUs. The aim is to investigate if early integration of PC via telemedicine, clinician education and bedside tools is effective and cost-effective, ultimately benefiting patients, relatives and ICU clinicians. This multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase aims to recruit around 2,000 patients from five European countries. All adult patients admitted to participating ICUs-with an ICU LOS exceeding 72 hours, where cancer is not the primary cause of critical illness, and who are not expected to die within the next 24 hours-are screened for the need for specialised PC based on the attending physician's judgement. This judgement is triggered by the presence of one or more of the following: (1) significant disagreement among ICU team members and/or relatives about the appropriateness of current ICU treatment, (2) considerations of limiting life-sustaining therapy or (3) the anticipation that a specialised PC consultation may benefit the patient, their relatives or the ICU team. Patients identified as needing specialised PC and their relatives are then enrolled after obtaining written informed consent.The complex intervention consists of (a) a blended-learning programme to foster knowledge and attitude about PC among ICU clinicians, (b) bedside tools, including a checklist to identify patients in need of PC and a factsheet and (c) standardised telemedical consultations from trained EPIC interventionists. Patient and relative follow-up is conducted 3 months post-ICU discharge. Outcomes include clinical measures (including ICU LOS (primary outcome), severity of critical illness, invasive treatments and health-related quality of life), economic endpoints (resource use, costs, cost-consequence situation, cost-effectiveness), ICU clinician burnout and distress, and patient and family perception about the quality of symptom management, care and communication. Endpoint analyses will employ generalised linear mixed models, accounting for the clustered data structure and stepped wedge design. EPIC complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by all local ethics committees. A decision-making structure is established to ensure trial procedures are carried out according to Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to participants, healthcare professionals and the public. Sets of anonymised study data will be made available following Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable principles. NCT06605079.
Children admitted to paediatric intensive care units frequently require invasive interventions and mechanical ventilation, requiring meticulous sedation management. Optimal care depends on careful titration of analgesics and sedatives, guided by clinician-administered assessment instruments to ensure proper dosing and minimise adverse effects. The State Behavioral Scale (SBS) is one of the two primary instruments recommended to assess sedation in mechanically ventilated children but has not been translated for French-speaking clinical settings or adapted for integration into an electronic health record (EHR) system. The aim of this study was to translate the original English SBS into French and adapt it culturally and digitally. This descriptive study, using a 10-step translation and cultural adaptation process, was conducted following the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Task Force framework for Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. One professional translator and 17 native-speaking expert clinicians participated in this process. The SBS was then adapted for digital use. The translation and cultural adaptation of the SBS ensured conceptual and linguistic equivalence through reconciliation, expert review, and harmonisation. Cognitive debriefing with nine nurses confirmed clarity and usability, leading to minor refinements and a supplementary guidance document. A digital version was developed for integration into the EHR, using selectable descriptors and automated scoring. This adaptation was reviewed by clinical and research experts and validated by the original SBS developer. A linguistically and culturally adapted version of the SBS for the French context has been developed and is ready for EHR integration and psychometric testing. The digitalised French version of the SBS will enable French-speaking settings to perform accurate and standardised sedation assessment in mechanically ventilated children, helping to prevent adverse effects of undersedation and oversedation and improve patient outcomes.
Patients aged ≥ 35 years at multiple sclerosis (MS) symptom onset with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥ 3 within the first year are at highest risk of developing aggressive MS (EDSS ≥ 6 within 10 years). Patients without these features are at lowest risk. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (HE-DMT) reduced the risk of relapse and disability accumulation in individuals at high risk of aggressive MS, and whether treatment benefit varied by MS severity. This observational cohort study used longitudinal data from two registries: MSBase (international) and OFSEP (France). Adults with relapse-onset MS and an EDSS score recorded within 12 months of symptom onset were included. Patients were classified into high-risk or low-risk groups for aggressive MS based on the above strata; those at intermediate risk were excluded. A pseudo-cohort framework compared periods of continuous HE-DMT (fingolimod, cladribine, monoclonal antibodies) with periods of non-HE-DMT states (on lower-efficacy DMTs or untreated) within each aggressive MS risk stratum. Marginal structural models with repeated adjustment for time-varying confounders of treatment and censoring were used to estimate counterfactual cumulative hazards of relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening and improvement. An interaction between MS risk stratum and treatment strategy was tested. A secondary analysis evaluated patients who received an HE-DMT during the study period. In total, 10,405 people (2021 high risk, 8384 low risk) were included. Continuous HE-DMT reduced the risk of relapse in both high-risk and low-risk groups. There was no evidence of a difference in disability outcomes between treatment approaches. There was no evidence of an interaction between aggressive MS risk and treatment effect. In stratified analyses, lowest relapse risk was observed in the low-risk group treated with HE-DMT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.80). Treatment with HE-DMT was associated with relapse risk comparable to that observed in the low-risk group not treated with HE-DMT (HR 0.99, 0.87-1.13). In a secondary analysis restricted to patients who receive HE-DMT during the study timeframe, treatment with HE-DMT reduced the risk of disability worsening in the high-risk group (HR 0.75, 0.58-0.99), to the level observed in the low-risk group (HR 0.80, 0.70-0.92). HE-DMTs reduced the risk of relapse in people at both high and low risk of aggressive MS, with no evidence of differential treatment benefit. In the overall population, no evidence of a difference in disability outcomes between HE-DMT-treated and HE-DMT-untreated time was observed. However, among patients ever exposed to HE-DMT, disability worsening was less common while treated with HE-DMT.
Cancer is a leading cause of death globally. Accurate cancer burden information is crucial for policy planning, but many countries do not have up-to-date cancer surveillance data. To inform global cancer-control efforts, we used the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023 framework to generate and analyse estimates of cancer burden for 47 cancer types or groupings by age, sex, and 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2023, cancer burden attributable to selected risk factors from 1990 to 2023, and forecasted cancer burden up to 2050. Cancer estimation in GBD 2023 used data from population-based cancer registration systems, vital registration systems, and verbal autopsies. Cancer mortality was estimated using ensemble models, with incidence informed by mortality estimates and mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Prevalence estimates were generated from modelled survival estimates, then multiplied by disability weights to estimate years lived with disability (YLDs). Years of life lost (YLLs) were estimated by multiplying age-specific cancer deaths by the GBD standard life expectancy at the age of death. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were calculated as the sum of YLLs and YLDs. We used the GBD 2023 comparative risk assessment framework to estimate cancer burden attributable to 44 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risk factors. To forecast cancer burden from 2024 to 2050, we used the GBD 2023 forecasting framework, which included forecasts of relevant risk factor exposures and used Socio-demographic Index as a covariate for forecasting the proportion of each cancer not affected by these risk factors. Progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 3.4 aim to reduce non-communicable disease mortality by a third between 2015 and 2030 was estimated for cancer. In 2023, excluding non-melanoma skin cancers, there were 18·5 million (95% uncertainty interval 16·4 to 20·7) incident cases of cancer and 10·4 million (9·65 to 10·9) deaths, contributing to 271 million (255 to 285) DALYs globally. Of these, 57·9% (56·1 to 59·8) of incident cases and 65·8% (64·3 to 67·6) of cancer deaths occurred in low-income to upper-middle-income countries based on World Bank income group classifications. Cancer was the second leading cause of deaths globally in 2023 after cardiovascular diseases. There were 4·33 million (3·85 to 4·78) risk-attributable cancer deaths globally in 2023, comprising 41·7% (37·8 to 45·4) of all cancer deaths. Risk-attributable cancer deaths increased by 72·3% (57·1 to 86·8) from 1990 to 2023, whereas overall global cancer deaths increased by 74·3% (62·2 to 86·2) over the same period. The reference forecasts (the most likely future) estimate that in 2050 there will be 30·5 million (22·9 to 38·9) cases and 18·6 million (15·6 to 21·5) deaths from cancer globally, 60·7% (41·9 to 80·6) and 74·5% (50·1 to 104·2) increases from 2024, respectively. These forecasted increases in deaths are greater in low-income and middle-income countries (90·6% [61·0 to 127·0]) compared with high-income countries (42·8% [28·3 to 58·6]). Most of these increases are likely due to demographic changes, as age-standardised death rates are forecast to change by -5·6% (-12·8 to 4·6) between 2024 and 2050 globally. Between 2015 and 2030, the probability of dying due to cancer between the ages of 30 years and 70 years was forecasted to have a relative decrease of 6·5% (3·2 to 10·3). Cancer is a major contributor to global disease burden, with increasing numbers of cases and deaths forecasted up to 2050 and a disproportionate growth in burden in countries with scarce resources. The decline in age-standardised mortality rates from cancer is encouraging but insufficient to meet the SDG target set for 2030. Effectively and sustainably addressing cancer burden globally will require comprehensive national and international efforts that consider health systems and context in the development and implementation of cancer-control strategies across the continuum of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Gates Foundation, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, and St Baldrick's Foundation.
Lower respiratory infections (LRIs) remain the world's leading infectious cause of death. This analysis from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023 provides global, regional, and national estimates of LRI incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), with attribution to 26 pathogens, including 11 newly modelled pathogens, across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2023. With new data and revised modelling techniques, these estimates serve as an update and expansion to GBD 2021. Through these estimates, we also aimed to assess progress towards the 2025 Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Pneumonia and Diarrhoea (GAPPD) target for pneumonia mortality in children younger than 5 years. Mortality from LRIs, defined as physician-diagnosed pneumonia or bronchiolitis, was estimated using the Cause of Death Ensemble model with data from vital registration, verbal autopsy, surveillance, and minimally invasive tissue sampling. The Bayesian meta-regression tool DisMod-MR 2.1 was used to model overall morbidity due to LRIs. DALYs were calculated as the sum of years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs) for all locations, years, age groups, and sexes. We modelled pathogen-specific case-fatality ratios (CFRs) for each age group and location using splined binomial regression to create internally consistent estimates of incidence and mortality proportions attributable to viral, fungal, parasitic, and bacterial pathogens. Progress was assessed towards the GAPPD target of less than three deaths from pneumonia per 1000 livebirths, which is roughly equivalent to a mortality rate of less than 60 deaths per 100 000 children younger than 5 years. In 2023, LRIs were responsible for 2·50 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 2·24-2·81) deaths and 98·7 million (87·7-112) DALYs, with children younger than 5 years and adults aged 70 years and older carrying the highest burden. LRI mortality in children younger than 5 years fell by 33·4% (10·4-47·4) since 2010, with a global mortality rate of 94·8 (75·6-116·4) per 100 000 person-years in 2023. Among adults aged 70 years and older, the burden remained substantial with only marginal declines since 2010. A mortality rate of less than 60 deaths per 100 000 for children younger than 5 years was met by 129 of the 204 modelled countries in 2023. At a super-regional level, sub-Saharan Africa had an aggregate mortality rate in children younger than 5 years (hereafter referred to as under-5 mortality rate) furthest from the GAPPD target. Streptococcus pneumoniae continued to account for the largest number of LRI deaths globally (634 000 [95% UI 565 000-721 000] deaths or 25·3% [24·5-26·1] of all LRI deaths), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (271 000 [243 000-298 000] deaths or 10·9% [10·3-11·3]), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (228 000 [204 000-261 000] deaths or 9·1% [8·8-9·5]). Among pathogens newly modelled in this study, non-tuberculous mycobacteria (responsible for 177 000 [95% UI 155 000-201 000] deaths) and Aspergillus spp (responsible for 67 800 [59 900-75 900] deaths) emerged as important contributors. Altogether, the 11 newly modelled pathogens accounted for approximately 22% of LRI deaths. This comprehensive analysis underscores both the gains achieved through vaccination and the challenges that remain in controlling the LRI burden globally. Furthermore, it demonstrates persistent disparities in disease burden, with the highest mortality rates concentrated in countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Globally, as well as in these high-burden locations, the under-5 LRI mortality rate remains well above the GAPPD target. Progress towards this target requires equitable access to vaccines and preventive therapies-including newer interventions such as respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibodies-and health systems capable of early diagnosis and treatment. Expanding surveillance of emerging pathogens, strengthening adult immunisation programmes, and combating vaccine hesitancy are also crucial. As the global population ages, the dual challenge of sustaining gains in child survival while addressing the rising vulnerability in older adults will shape future pneumonia control strategies. Gates Foundation.
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of biomarkers is challenging due to the indirect impact on health outcomes and the lack of sufficient fit-for-purpose data. Hands-on guidance is lacking. We aimed firstly to explore how CEAs in the context of three different types of biomarker applications have addressed these challenges, and secondly to develop recommendations for future CEAs. A scoping review was performed for three biomarker applications: predictive, prognostic, and serial testing, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, early-stage colorectal cancer, and all-stage colorectal cancer, respectively. Information was extracted on the model assumptions and uncertainty, and the reported outcomes. An in-depth analysis of the literature was performed describing the impact of model assumptions in the included studies. A total of 43 CEAs were included (31 predictive, 6 prognostic, and 6 serial testing). Of these, 40 utilized different sources for test and treatment parameters, and three studies utilized a single source. Test performance was included in 78% of these studies utilizing different sources, but this parameter was differently expressed across biomarker applications. Sensitivity analyses for test performance was only performed in half of these studies. For the linkage of test results to treatments outcomes, a minority of the studies explored the impact of suboptimal adherence to test results, and/or explored potential differences in treatment effects for different biomarker subgroups. Intermediate outcomes were reported by 67% of studies. We identified various approaches for dealing with challenges in CEAs of biomarker tests for three different biomarker applications. Recommendations on assumptions, handling uncertainty, and reported outcomes were drafted to enhance modeling practices for future biomarker cost-effectiveness evaluations.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women. Currently, BC is treated with a holistic and multidisciplinary approach from diagnostic, surgical, radio-oncological, and medical perspectives, and advances including in early detection and treatment methods have led to improved outcomes for patients in recent years. Yet, BC remains the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths among women and there is an array of gaps to achieve optimal care. To close gaps in cancer care, here we describe a collaborative Request For Proposals (RFP) framework supporting independent initiatives for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients and aiming at improving their quality of care. We set up a collaborative framework between Pfizer and Sharing Progress in Cancer Care (SPCC). Our model is based on an RFP system in which Pfizer and SPCC worked together ensuring the independence of the funded projects. We developed a three-step life cycle RFP. The collaborating framework of the project was based on an RFP with a USD 1.5 million available budget for funding independent grants made available from Pfizer and managed in terms of awareness, selection, and monitoring by SPCC. Our three-step model could be applicable and scalable to quality improvement (QI) initiatives that are devoted to tackling obstacles to reaching optimal care. Through this model, seven projects from five different European countries were supported. These projects covered a range of issues related to the experience of patients with MBC: investigator communication, information, and shared decision-making (SDM) practices across Europe; development, delivery, and evaluation of a scalable online educational program for nurses; assessment of disparities among different minority patient groups; development of solutions to improve compliance or adherence to therapy; an information technology (IT) solution to improve quality of life (QoL) of patients with MBC and an initiative to increase awareness and visibility of MBC patients. Overall, an average of 171 healthcare professionals (HCPs) per project and approximately 228,675 patients per project were impacted. We set up and describe a partnership model among different stakeholders within the healthcare ecosystem-academia, non-profit organizations, oncologists, and pharmaceutical companies-aiming at supporting independent projects to close gaps in the care of patients with MBC. By removing barriers at different layers, these projects contributed to the achievement of optimal care for patients with MBC.
Despite the well documented consequences of obesity during childhood and adolescence and future risks of excess body mass on non-communicable diseases in adulthood, coordinated global action on excess body mass in early life is still insufficient. Inconsistent measurement and reporting are a barrier to specific targets, resource allocation, and interventions. In this Article we report current estimates of overweight and obesity across childhood and adolescence, progress over time, and forecasts to inform specific actions. Using established methodology from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2021, we modelled overweight and obesity across childhood and adolescence from 1990 to 2021, and then forecasted to 2050. Primary data for our models included 1321 unique measured and self-reported anthropometric data sources from 180 countries and territories from survey microdata, reports, and published literature. These data were used to estimate age-standardised global, regional, and national overweight prevalence and obesity prevalence (separately) for children and young adolescents (aged 5-14 years, typically in school and cared for by child health services) and older adolescents (aged 15-24 years, increasingly out of school and cared for by adult services) by sex for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021. Prevalence estimates from 1990 to 2021 were generated using spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression models, which leveraged temporal and spatial correlation in epidemiological trends to ensure comparability of results across time and geography. Prevalence forecasts from 2022 to 2050 were generated using a generalised ensemble modelling approach assuming continuation of current trends. For every age-sex-location population across time (1990-2050), we estimated obesity (vs overweight) predominance using the log ratio of obesity percentage to overweight percentage. Between 1990 and 2021, the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents doubled, and that of obesity alone tripled. By 2021, 93·1 million (95% uncertainty interval 89·6-96·6) individuals aged 5-14 years and 80·6 million (78·2-83·3) aged 15-24 years had obesity. At the super-region level in 2021, the prevalence of overweight and of obesity was highest in north Africa and the Middle East (eg, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait), and the greatest increase from 1990 to 2021 was seen in southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania (eg, Taiwan [province of China], Maldives, and China). By 2021, for females in both age groups, many countries in Australasia (eg, Australia) and in high-income North America (eg, Canada) had already transitioned to obesity predominance, as had males and females in a number of countries in north Africa and the Middle East (eg, United Arab Emirates and Qatar) and Oceania (eg, Cook Islands and American Samoa). From 2022 to 2050, global increases in overweight (not obesity) prevalence are forecasted to stabilise, yet the increase in the absolute proportion of the global population with obesity is forecasted to be greater than between 1990 and 2021, with substantial increases forecast between 2022 and 2030, which continue between 2031 and 2050. By 2050, super-region obesity prevalence is forecasted to remain highest in north Africa and the Middle East (eg, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait), and forecasted increases in obesity are still expected to be largest across southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania (eg, Timor-Leste and North Korea), but also in south Asia (eg, Nepal and Bangladesh). Compared with those aged 15-24 years, in most super-regions (except Latin America and the Caribbean and the high-income super-region) a greater proportion of those aged 5-14 years are forecasted to have obesity than overweight by 2050. Globally, 15·6% (12·7-17·2) of those aged 5-14 years are forecasted to have obesity by 2050 (186 million [141-221]), compared with 14·2% (11·4-15·7) of those aged 15-24 years (175 million [136-203]). We forecasted that by 2050, there will be more young males (aged 5-14 years) living with obesity (16·5% [13·3-18·3]) than overweight (12·9% [12·2-13·6]); while for females (aged 5-24 years) and older males (aged 15-24 years), overweight will remain more prevalent than obesity. At a regional level, the following populations are forecast to have transitioned to obesity (vs overweight) predominance before 2041-50: children and adolescents (males and females aged 5-24 years) in north Africa and the Middle East and Tropical Latin America; males aged 5-14 years in east Asia, central and southern sub-Saharan Africa, and central Latin America; females aged 5-14 years in Australasia; females aged 15-24 years in Australasia, high-income North America, and southern sub-Saharan Africa; and males aged 15-24 years in high-income North America. Both overweight and obesity increased substantially in every world region between 1990 and 2021, suggesting that current approaches to curbing increases in overweight and obesity have failed a generation of children and adolescents. Beyond 2021, overweight during childhood and adolescence is forecast to stabilise due to further increases in the population who have obesity. Increases in obesity are expected to continue for all populations in all world regions. Because substantial change is forecasted to occur between 2022 and 2030, immediate actions are needed to address this public health crisis. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Road injuries are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Years of international efforts have aimed to strengthen policy engagement, including the 2020 UN General Assembly's proclamation of the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety (2021-30), targeting a 50% reduction in road traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2030. The aim of this study is to provide estimates to monitor progress and identify intervention gaps. As part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2023, we estimated incidence, mortality, and morbidity of road injuries for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2023. Four road injury types and 47 nature-of-injury categories were examined. Morbidity and mortality data from clinical records, vital registration, and police reports were harmonised using meta-analytic techniques to ensure consistency and correct for systematic bias. Incidence was modelled with the meta-regression tool Disease Modelling-Meta-Regression version 2.1 and cause-specific mortality with the Cause of Death Ensemble model, both incorporating location-specific covariates to support interpolation. Years of life lived with disability (YLDs) were estimated from the prevalence and severity of the nature of road injury, and years of life lost (YLLs) from the number of cause-specific deaths multiplied by the standard life expectancy at the age of death. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were the sum of YLLs and YLDs. All metrics were calculated with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs). In 2023, there were 50·9 million (95% UI 46·1-56·1) road injury incident cases, 1·34 million (1·04-1·58) deaths, and 75·3 million (59·8-89·2) DALYs globally. Road injuries were the leading global cause of death among males aged 10-39 years. Between 1990 and 2023, age-standardised incidence decreased by 38·3% (95% UI 36·9-39·7) and mortality decreased by 32·3% (6·1-49·0), but progress varied widely by World Bank income group. Mortality in low-income countries (43·8 [95% UI 31·7-56·0] deaths per 100 000 population) was approximately six times higher than in high-income countries (7·5 [7·1-7·9] deaths per 100 000), despite the high-income countries showing the highest age-standardised incidence rates (858·1 [95% UI 781·9-947·1] cases per 100 000). In the past decade, many countries achieved notable reductions in road injuries, but others, including Ghana and the USA, saw increases. More severe injuries tended to occur in low-income and middle-income countries. Although global incidence, mortality, and DALY rates from road injuries have declined, progress remains uneven, with pronounced disparities across income groups reflecting systemic inadequacies in infrastructure, vehicle standards, enforcement, and post-crash care. Strengthening emergency response, improving road design, enforcing safety measures, and adapting policies to the evolving demographics remain essential. Gates Foundation.
When randomized trials are unavailable or not feasible, observational studies can be used to answer causal questions about the comparative effects of interventions by attempting to emulate a hypothetical pragmatic randomized trial (target trial). Published guidance to aid reporting of these studies is not available. To develop consensus based guidance for reporting observational studies performed to estimate causal effects by explicitly emulating a target trial. The Transparent Reporting of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial (TARGET) guideline was developed using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) framework. The development included (1) a systematic review of reporting practices in published studies that had explicitly aimed to emulate a target trial; (2) a two round online survey (August 2023 to March 2024; 18 expert participants from six countries) to assess the importance of candidate items selected from previous research and to identify additional items; (3) a three day, expert consensus meeting (June 2024; 18 panelists) to refine the scope of the guideline and draft the checklist; and (4) pilot of the draft checklist with stakeholders (n=108; September 2024 to February 2025). The checklist was further refined based on feedback on successive drafts. The 21-item TARGET checklist is organized into six sections (abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, other information). TARGET provides guidance for reporting observational studies of interventions explicitly emulating a parallel group, individually randomized target trial, with adjustment for baseline confounders. Key recommendations are to (1) identify the study as an observational emulation of a target trial; (2) summarize the causal question and reason for emulating a target trial; (3) clearly specify the target trial protocol (ie, the causal estimand, identifying assumptions, data analysis plan) and how it was mapped to the observational data; and (4) report the estimate obtained for each causal estimand, its precision, and findings from additional analyses to assess the sensitivity of the estimates to assumptions, and design and analysis choices. Application of the TARGET guideline recommendations aims to improve reporting transparency and peer review and help researchers, clinicians, and other readers interpret and apply the results.
Child growth failure (CGF), which includes underweight, wasting, and stunting, is among the factors most strongly associated with mortality and morbidity in children younger than 5 years worldwide. Poor height and bodyweight gain arise from a variety of biological and sociodemographic factors and are associated with increased vulnerability to infectious diseases. We used data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2023 to estimate CGF prevalence, the risk of infectious diseases associated with CGF, and the disease mortality, morbidity, and overall burden associated with CGF. In this analysis we estimated the all-cause and cause-specific (diarrhoea, lower respiratory tract infections, malaria, and measles) disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost and mortality associated with stunting, wasting, underweight, and CGF in aggregate. We combined the burden associated with mild, moderate, and severe forms of CGF: stunting was defined as height-for-age Z scores (HAZ) less than -1, underweight was defined as weight-for-age Z scores (WAZ) less than -1, and wasting was defined as weight-for-height Z scores (WHZ) less than -1, according to WHO Child Growth Standards. Population-level continuous distributions of HAZ, WAZ, and WHZ were estimated for 2000 to 2023 using data from surveys, literature, and individual-level study data. The risk of incidence of, and mortality due to, diarrhoea, lower respiratory infections, malaria, and measles was separately estimated in a meta-regression framework from longitudinal cohort data for Z scores less than -1. Finally, fatal outcomes associated with these diseases were estimated with vital registration, verbal autopsy, and case-fatality data, while non-fatal outcomes were estimated with surveys as well as health-care utilisation and case reporting data. The exposure prevalence and relative risk estimates were from continuous distributions, allowing for direct assessment of the attributable fractions for mild, moderate, and severe stunting, underweight, wasting, and the combined impact of child growth failure within populations. All estimates were age-specific, sex-specific, geography-specific, and year-specific. We estimated that, in children younger than 5 years in 2023, CGF was associated with 79·4 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 47·0-106) DALYs lost and 880 000 (517 000-1 170 000) deaths. This represented 17·9% (10·6-23·8) of 444 million (434-457) total under-5 DALYs and 18·8% (11·1-25·0) of all 4·67 million (4·59-4·75) under-5 deaths. Compared to stunting (33·0 million [24·1-42·2] DALYs, 373 000 [272 000-477 000] deaths) and wasting (39·2 million [23·8-53·0] DALYs, 428 000 [256 000-583 000] deaths), childhood underweight was associated with the largest share of CGF-related disease burden: 52·2 million (21·9-75·1) DALYs and 573 000 (236 000-824 000) deaths in children younger than 5 years in 2023. CGF remains a leading factor associated with death and disability in children younger than 5 years, despite global attention and focused interventions to reduce the prevalence of associated CGF indicators. Our findings underscore the need for policies, strategies, and interventions that focus on all indicators of CGF to reduce its associated health burden. Gates Foundation.