No single market strategy always wins: momentum, mean reversion, risk control,and event-driven rules can each succeed or fail as market conditions change.Rather than asking large language models to directly generate market actions,we study an executable decision paradigm where an agent selects from a library of programmatic strategies, each implemented as a code module mapping market observations to actions.We propose \textbf{MetaPS}, a simulation-guided framework for adaptive programmatic strategy selection. MetaPS rolls out candidate strategies in simulated or backtested markets, identifies states where particular strategies lead to better future outcomes, and converts these state--strategy pairs into supervised fine-tuning data. During inference, the simulator is no longer queried: MetaPS observes only the current market state and candidate strategy context, selects a suitable strategy program, and the selected program produces the final action. Experiments on multi-stock trading and a controlled goods-exchange sandbox show that MetaPS consistently improves across model scales from 0.8B to 9B parameters. It outperforms fixed-strategy baselines, direct decision-making agents, and
Training interpretable concept-based policies requires practitioners to manually select which human-understandable concepts an agent should reason with when making sequential decisions. This selection demands domain expertise, is time-consuming and costly, scales poorly with the number of candidates, and provides no performance guarantees. To overcome this limitation, we propose the first algorithms for principled automatic concept selection in sequential decision-making. Our key insight is that concept selection can be viewed through the lens of state abstraction: intuitively, a concept is decision-relevant if removing it would cause the agent to confuse states that require different actions. As a result, agents should rely on decision-relevant concepts; states with the same concept representation should share the same optimal action, which preserves the optimal decision structure of the original state space. This perspective leads to the Decision-Relevant Selection (DRS) algorithm, which selects a subset of concepts from a candidate set, along with performance bounds relating the selected concepts to the performance of the resulting policy. Empirically, DRS automatically recovers
Low-discrepancy designs play a central role in quasi-Monte Carlo methods and are increasingly influential in other domains such as machine learning, robotics and computer graphics, to name a few. In recent years, one such low-discrepancy construction method called subset selection has received a lot of attention. Given a large population, one optimally selects a small low-discrepancy subset with respect to a discrepancy-based objective. Versions of this problem are known to be NP-hard. In this text, we establish, for the first time, that the subset selection problem with respect to kernel discrepancies is also NP-hard. Motivated by this intractability, we propose a Bayesian Optimization procedure for the subset selection problem utilizing the recent notion of deep embedding kernels. We demonstrate the performance of the BO algorithm to minimize discrepancy measures and note that the framework is broadly applicable any design criteria.
In many institutional settings, $k$ items are selected with the goal of representing the underlying distribution of claims, opinions, or characteristics in a large population. We study environments with two adversarial parties whose preferences over the selected items are commonly known and opposed. We propose the Quantile Mechanism: one party partitions the population into $k$ disjoint subsets, and the other selects one item from each subset. We show that this procedure is optimally representative among all feasible mechanisms, and illustrate its use in jury selection, multi-district litigation, and committee formation.
Feature selection is fundamental to robust data-centric AI, but most existing methods optimize predictive performance under a single data distribution. This often selects spurious features that fail under distribution shifts. Motivated by principles from causal invariance, we study feature selection from a stability perspective and introduce Causally-Guided Diffusion for Stable Feature Selection (CGDFS). In CGDFS, we formalized feature selection as approximate posterior inference over feature subsets, whose posterior mass favors low prediction error and low cross-environment variance. Our framework combines three key insights: First, we formulate feature selection as stability-aware posterior sampling. Here, causal invariance serves as a soft inductive bias rather than explicit causal discovery. Second, we train a diffusion model as a learned prior over plausible continuous selection masks, combined with a stability-aware likelihood that rewards invariance across environments. This diffusion prior captures structural dependencies among features and enables scalable exploration of the combinatorially large selection space. Third, we perform guided annealed Langevin sampling that com
Efficient data selection is essential for improving the training efficiency of deep neural networks and reducing the associated annotation costs. However, traditional methods tend to be computationally expensive, limiting their scalability and real-world applicability. We introduce PruneFuse, a novel method that combines pruning and network fusion to enhance data selection and accelerate network training. In PruneFuse, the original dense network is pruned to generate a smaller surrogate model that efficiently selects the most informative samples from the dataset. Once this iterative data selection selects sufficient samples, the insights learned from the pruned model are seamlessly integrated with the dense model through network fusion, providing an optimized initialization that accelerates training. Extensive experimentation on various datasets demonstrates that PruneFuse significantly reduces computational costs for data selection, achieves better performance than baselines, and accelerates the overall training process.
Unsupervised feature selection (FS) is essential for high-dimensional learning tasks where labels are not available. It helps reduce noise, improve generalization, and enhance interpretability. However, most existing unsupervised FS methods evaluate features in isolation, even though informative signals often emerge from groups of related features. For example, adjacent pixels, functionally connected brain regions, or correlated financial indicators tend to act together, making independent evaluation suboptimal. Although some methods attempt to capture group structure, they typically rely on predefined partitions or label supervision, limiting their applicability. We propose GroupFS, an end-to-end, fully differentiable framework that jointly discovers latent feature groups and selects the most informative groups among them, without relying on fixed a priori groups or label supervision. GroupFS enforces Laplacian smoothness on both feature and sample graphs and applies a group sparsity regularizer to learn a compact, structured representation. Across nine benchmarks spanning images, tabular data, and biological datasets, GroupFS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art unsupervised
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at few-shot learning via in-context learning (ICL). However, the effectiveness of ICL is often sensitive to the selection and ordering of demonstration examples. To address this, we present MarginSel: Max-Margin Demonstration Selection for LLMs, a two-step method that selects hard demonstration examples for the ICL prompt, adapting to each test instance. Our approach achieves 2-7% absolute improvement in F1-score across classification tasks, compared to a random selection of examples. We also provide theoretical insights and empirical evidence showing that MarginSel induces max-margin behavior in LLMs by effectively increasing the margin for hard examples, analogous to support vectors, thereby shifting the decision boundary in a beneficial direction.
Feature selection has emerged as a crucial technique in refining recommender systems. Recent advancements leveraging Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has drawn significant attention, particularly in two main categories: early feature selection and late feature selection, differentiated by whether the selection occurs before or after the embedding layer. The early feature selection selects a fixed subset of features and retrains the model, while the late feature selection, known as adaptive feature selection, dynamically adjusts feature choices for each data instance, recognizing the variability in feature significance. Although adaptive feature selection has shown remarkable improvements in performance, its main drawback lies in its post-embedding layer feature selection. This process often becomes cumbersome and inefficient in large-scale recommender systems with billions of ID-type features, leading to a highly sparse and parameter-heavy embedding layer. To overcome this, we introduce Adaptive Early Feature Selection (AEFS), a very simple method that not only adaptively selects informative features for each instance, but also significantly reduces the activated parameters of t
Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for deploying machine learning systems in high-stakes domains. Conformal prediction provides distribution-free coverage guarantees but often produces overly large prediction sets, limiting its practical utility. To address this issue, we propose \textit{Selective Conformal Risk Control} (SCRC), a unified framework that integrates conformal prediction with selective classification. The framework formulates uncertainty control as a two-stage problem: the first stage selects confident samples for prediction, and the second stage applies conformal risk control on the selected subset to construct calibrated prediction sets. We develop two algorithms under this framework. The first, SCRC-T, preserves exchangeability by computing thresholds jointly over calibration and test samples, offering exact finite-sample guarantees. The second, SCRC-I, is a calibration-only variant that provides PAC-style probabilistic guarantees while being more computational efficient. Experiments on two public datasets show that both methods achieve the target coverage and risk levels, with nearly identical performance, while SCRC-I exhibits slightly more conserva
This paper introduces a novel criterion, persuasiveness, to select equilibria in signaling games. In response to the Stiglitz critique, persuasiveness focuses on the comparison across equilibria. An equilibrium is more persuasive than an alternative if the set of types of the sender who prefer the alternative would sequentially deviate to the former once other types have done so -- that is, if an unraveling occurs. Persuasiveness has strong selective power: it uniquely selects an equilibrium outcome in monotone signaling games. Moreover, in non-monotone signaling games, persuasiveness refines predictions beyond existing selection criteria. Notably, it can also select equilibria in cheap-talk games, where standard equilibrium refinements for signaling games have no selective power.
Stability selection has gained popularity as a method for enhancing the performance of variable selection algorithms while controlling false discovery rates. However, achieving these desirable properties depends on correctly specifying the stable threshold parameter, which can be challenging. An arbitrary choice of this parameter can substantially alter the set of selected variables, as the variables' selection probabilities are inherently data-dependent. To address this issue, we propose Exclusion Automatic Threshold Selection (EATS), a data-adaptive algorithm that streamlines stability selection by automating the threshold specification process. EATS initially filters out potential noise variables using an exclusion probability threshold, derived from applying stability selection to a randomly shuffled version of the dataset. Following this, EATS selects the stable threshold parameter using the elbow method, balancing the marginal utility of including additional variables against the risk of selecting superfluous variables. We evaluate our approach through an extensive simulation study, benchmarking across commonly used variable selection algorithms and static stable threshold va
Lexicase selection has been shown to provide advantages over other selection algorithms in several areas of evolutionary computation and machine learning. In its standard form, lexicase selection filters a population or other collection based on randomly ordered training cases that are considered one at a time. This iterated filtering process can be time-consuming, particularly in settings with large numbers of training cases. In this paper, we propose a new method that is nearly equivalent to lexicase selection in terms of the individuals that it selects, but which does so significantly more quickly. The new method, called DALex (for Diversely Aggregated Lexicase), selects the best individual with respect to a weighted sum of training case errors, where the weights are randomly sampled. This allows us to formulate the core computation required for selection as matrix multiplication instead of recursive loops of comparisons, which in turn allows us to take advantage of optimized and parallel algorithms designed for matrix multiplication for speedup. Furthermore, we show that we can interpolate between the behavior of lexicase selection and its "relaxed" variants, such as epsilon or
Graph self-training is a semi-supervised learning method that iteratively selects a set of unlabeled data to retrain the underlying graph neural network (GNN) model and improve its prediction performance. While selecting highly confident nodes has proven effective for self-training, this pseudo-labeling strategy ignores the combinatorial dependencies between nodes and suffers from a local view of the distribution. To overcome these issues, we propose BANGS, a novel framework that unifies the labeling strategy with conditional mutual information as the objective of node selection. Our approach -- grounded in game theory -- selects nodes in a combinatorial fashion and provides theoretical guarantees for robustness under noisy objective. More specifically, unlike traditional methods that rank and select nodes independently, BANGS considers nodes as a collective set in the self-training process. Our method demonstrates superior performance and robustness across various datasets, base models, and hyperparameter settings, outperforming existing techniques. The codebase is available on https://github.com/fangxin-wang/BANGS .
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong in-context learning (ICL) abilities with a few demonstrations. However, one critical challenge is how to select demonstrations to elicit the full potential of LLMs. In this paper, we propose Curriculum Demonstration Selection (CDS), a novel demonstration selection method for ICL. Instead of merely using similarity, CDS additionally partitions samples by their complexity measurements. Following curriculum learning, CDS then selects demonstrations from easy to difficult. Thus the selected demonstrations cover a wide range of difficulty levels, enabling LLMs to learn from varied complexities within the training set. Experiments demonstrate that our CDS consistently outperforms baseline methods, achieving notable improvements across nine LLMs on three benchmarks. Moreover, CDS proves especially effective in enhancing LLM performance in solving challenging problems.
Stability selection is a popular method for improving feature selection algorithms. One of its key attributes is that it provides theoretical upper bounds on the expected number of false positives, E(FP), enabling false positive control in practice. However, stability selection often selects few features because existing bounds on E(FP) are relatively loose. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to stability selection based on integrating stability paths rather than maximizing over them. This yields upper bounds on E(FP) that are much stronger than previous bounds, leading to significantly more true positives in practice for the same target E(FP). Furthermore, our method requires no more computation than the original stability selection algorithm. We demonstrate the method on simulations and real data from two cancer studies.
Multiview camera setups have proven useful in many computer vision applications for reducing ambiguities, mitigating occlusions, and increasing field-of-view coverage. However, the high computational cost associated with multiple views poses a significant challenge for end devices with limited computational resources. To address this issue, we propose a view selection approach that analyzes the target object or scenario from given views and selects the next best view for processing. Our approach features a reinforcement learning based camera selection module, MVSelect, that not only selects views but also facilitates joint training with the task network. Experimental results on multiview classification and detection tasks show that our approach achieves promising performance while using only 2 or 3 out of N available views, significantly reducing computational costs. Furthermore, analysis on the selected views reveals that certain cameras can be shut off with minimal performance impact, shedding light on future camera layout optimization for multiview systems. Code is available at https://github.com/hou-yz/MVSelect.
We investigate feature selection problem for generic machine learning models. We introduce a novel framework that selects features considering the outcomes of the model. Our framework introduces a novel feature masking approach to eliminate the features during the selection process, instead of completely removing them from the dataset. This allows us to use the same machine learning model during feature selection, unlike other feature selection methods where we need to train the machine learning model again as the dataset has different dimensions on each iteration. We obtain the mask operator using the predictions of the machine learning model, which offers a comprehensive view on the subsets of the features essential for the predictive performance of the model. A variety of approaches exist in the feature selection literature. However, to our knowledge, no study has introduced a training-free framework for a generic machine learning model to select features while considering the importance of the feature subsets as a whole, instead of focusing on the individual features. We demonstrate significant performance improvements on the real-life datasets under different settings using Li
In-context learning (ICL), the ability of large language models to perform novel tasks by conditioning on a prompt with a few task examples, requires these examples to be informative about the test instance. The standard approach of independently ranking and selecting the most similar examples selects redundant examples while omitting important information. In this work, we show that BERTScore-Recall (BSR) selects better examples that demonstrate more of the salient aspects, e.g. reasoning patterns, of the test input. We further extend BSR and many standard metrics to easily optimizable set-level metrics, giving still better coverage of those salient aspects. On 15 datasets spanning 6 tasks and with 7 diverse LLMs, we show that (1) BSR is the superior metric for in-context example selection across the board, and (2) for compositional tasks, set selection using Set-BSR outperforms independent ranking by up to 17 points on average and, despite being training-free, surpasses methods that leverage task or LLM-specific training.
Compared to supervised variable selection, the research on unsupervised variable selection is far behind. A forward partial-variable clustering full-variable loss (FPCFL) method is proposed for the corresponding challenges. An advantage is that the FPCFL method can distinguish active, redundant, and uninformative variables, which the previous methods cannot achieve. Theoretical and simulation studies show that the performance of a clustering method using all the variables can be worse if many uninformative variables are involved. Better results are expected if the uninformative variables are excluded. The research addresses a previous concern about how variable selection affects the performance of clustering. Rather than many previous methods attempting to select all the relevant variables, the proposed method selects a subset that can induce an equally good result. This phenomenon does not appear in the supervised variable selection problems.