搜索结果：hackers

Underground forums serve as hubs for cybercriminal activities, offering a space for anonymity and evasion of conventional online oversight. In these hidden communities, malicious actors collaborate to exchange illicit knowledge, tools, and tactics, driving a range of cyber threats from hacking techniques to the sale of stolen data, malware, and zero-day exploits. Identifying the key instigators (i.e., key hackers), behind these operations is essential but remains a complex challenge. This paper presents a novel method called EUREKHA (Enhancing User Representation for Key Hacker Identification in Underground Forums), designed to identify these key hackers by modeling each user as a textual sequence. This sequence is processed through a large language model (LLM) for domain-specific adaptation, with LLMs acting as feature extractors. These extracted features are then fed into a Graph Neural Network (GNN) to model user structural relationships, significantly improving identification accuracy. Furthermore, we employ BERTopic (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Topic Modeling) to extract personalized topics from user-generated content, enabling multiple textual repr

Code protections aim at blocking (or at least delaying) reverse engineering and tampering attacks to critical assets within programs. Knowing the way hackers understand protected code and perform attacks is important to achieve a stronger protection of the software assets, based on realistic assumptions about the hackers' behaviour. However, building such knowledge is difficult because hackers can hardly be involved in controlled experiments and empirical studies. The FP7 European project Aspire has given the authors of this paper the unique opportunity to have access to the professional penetration testers employed by the three industrial partners. In particular, we have been able to perform a qualitative analysis of three reports of professional penetration test performed on protected industrial code. Our qualitative analysis of the reports consists of open coding, carried out by 7 annotators and resulting in 459 annotations, followed by concept extraction and model inference. We identified the main activities: understanding, building attack, choosing and customizing tools, and working around or defeating protections. We built a model of how such activities take place. We used su

Authors of malicious software are not hiding as much as one would assume: they have a visible online footprint. Apart from online forums, this footprint appears in software development platforms, where authors create publicly-accessible malware repositories to share and collaborate. With the exception of a few recent efforts, the existence and the dynamics of this community has received surprisingly limited attention. The goal of our work is to analyze this ecosystem of hackers in order to: (a) understand their collaborative patterns, and (b) identify and profile its most influential authors. We develop HackerScope, a systematic approach for analyzing the dynamics of this hacker ecosystem. Leveraging our targeted data collection, we conduct an extensive study of 7389 authors of malware repositories on GitHub, which we combine with their activity on four security forums. From a modeling point of view, we study the ecosystem using three network representations: (a) the author-author network, (b) the author-repository network, and (c) cross-platform egonets. Our analysis leads to the following key observations: (a) the ecosystem is growing at an accelerating rate as the number of new

Agent benchmarks score submissions with outcome verifiers that are typically hand-written and brittle, leaving them open to reward hacking. We audit 1,968 tasks across five terminal-agent benchmarks and find 323 (16%) hackable by frontier models given only the task description. This corrupts both leaderboard rankings and RL training signal, yet the standard response is manual and reactive. We introduce the hacker-fixer loop, a method for building exploit-resistant verifiers without per-task manual patching. The loop alternates three LLM agents: a hacker tries to pass the verifier without solving the task, a fixer patches the verifier to reject each discovered exploit, and a solver confirms the patched verifier still admits legitimate solutions. The loop iterates: each patch reshapes what the verifier rewards, surfacing the next exploit. We further add verifier access, and let patches transfer across tasks, to broaden the exploits the loop discovers. On KernelBench, the loop drives the attack success rate from 62% to 0% on a held-out corpus of publicly reported exploits. We also find that weaker agents in the loop can defend against much stronger hackers: Gemini 3 Flash's loop drive

Understanding and quantifying human cognitive biases from empirical data has long posed a formidable challenge, particularly in cybersecurity, where defending against unknown adversaries is paramount. Traditional cyber defense strategies have largely focused on fortification, while some approaches attempt to anticipate attacker strategies by mapping them to cognitive vulnerabilities, yet they fall short in dynamically interpreting attacks in progress. In recognition of this gap, IARPA's ReSCIND program seeks to infer, defend against, and even exploit attacker cognitive traits. In this paper, we present a novel methodology that leverages large language models (LLMs) to extract quantifiable insights into the cognitive bias of loss aversion from hacker behavior. Our data are collected from an experiment in which hackers were recruited to attack a controlled demonstration network. We process the hacker generated notes using LLMs using it to segment the various actions and correlate the actions to predefined persistence mechanisms used by hackers. By correlating the implementation of these mechanisms with various operational triggers, our analysis provides new insights into how loss ave

We study how bug bounty programs (BBPs) shape software vendors' security and release choices. We develop a game-theoretic model in which a vendor chooses release timing and severity-contingent bounties, anticipating effort by ethical and malicious hackers in a winner-take-all discovery race. The model highlights two linked mechanisms: an incentive channel that shifts first discovery of severe vulnerabilities away from malicious exploitation and toward ethical reporting, and a governance channel in which coordinated disclosure changes how vulnerability information is managed during remediation. We derive closed-form optimal bounties and characterize a feasibility region sustaining positive bounties and interior success probabilities. Within it, a BBP strictly increases the vendor's expected profit by reallocating first-discovery probability on severe vulnerabilities from malicious to ethical hackers and by converting part of severe-loss exposure into bounded, pay-for-results expenditures. For private programs, we solve for the optimal invited set of ethical hackers and show it is strictly smaller than the expected number of malicious attackers. Higher bounties raise ethical hackers'

We propose and analyze a generalized compartment model for hacker dynamics in cybersecurity systems. This model is an extension of a recently introduced framework, replacing the bilinear interaction term with a broad class of nonlinear incidence functions. This provides greater modeling flexibility and allows for the description of a wider range of cyber-propagation and information-spreading processes. First, we investigate the qualitative dynamics of the model. We establish the positivity and boundedness of solutions, derive the basic reproduction number, and characterize the existence of hacker-free and hacker-present equilibria. We obtain local and global asymptotic stability results, yielding a complete description of the global dynamics in terms of the basic reproduction number. Next, we develop a second-order, positivity-preserving, nonstandard finite difference (NSFD) scheme for numerical simulations. Unlike many existing NSFD approaches, which are typically first-order accurate, the proposed method achieves second-order convergence while preserving positivity for arbitrary step sizes. Furthermore, the proposed method reproduces the asymptotic stability properties of the con

Social media platforms have become more influential than traditional news sources, shaping public discourse and accelerating the spread of information. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), open-source software (OSS) projects can leverage these platforms to gain visibility and attract contributors. In this study, we investigate the relationship between Hacker News, a social news site focused on computer science and entrepreneurship, and the extent to which it influences developer activity on the promoted GitHub AI projects. We analyzed 2,195 Hacker News (HN) stories and their corresponding comments over a two-year period. Our findings reveal that at least 19\% of AI developers promoted their GitHub projects on Hacker News, often receiving positive engagement from the community. By tracking activity on the associated 1,814 GitHub repositories after they were shared on Hacker News, we observed a significant increase in forks, stars, and contributors. These results suggest that Hacker News serves as a viable platform for AI-powered OSS projects, with the potential to gain attention, foster community engagement, and accelerate software development.

Reentrancy, a notorious vulnerability in smart contracts, has led to millions of dollars in financial loss. However, current smart contract vulnerability detection tools suffer from a high false positive rate in identifying contracts with reentrancy vulnerabilities. Moreover, only a small portion of the detected reentrant contracts can actually be exploited by hackers, making these tools less effective in securing the Ethereum ecosystem in practice. In this paper, we propose BlockWatchdog, a tool that focuses on detecting reentrancy vulnerabilities by identifying attacker contracts. These attacker contracts are deployed by hackers to exploit vulnerable contracts automatically. By focusing on attacker contracts, BlockWatchdog effectively detects truly exploitable reentrancy vulnerabilities by identifying reentrant call flow. Additionally, BlockWatchdog is capable of detecting new types of reentrancy vulnerabilities caused by poor designs when using ERC tokens or user-defined interfaces, which cannot be detected by current rule-based tools. We implement BlockWatchdog using cross-contract static dataflow techniques based on attack logic obtained from an empirical study that analyzes a