Data donation, an emerging user-centric data collection method for public sector research, faces a gap between participant willingness and actual donation. This suggests a design absence in practice: while promoted as "donor-centered" with technical and regulational advances, a design perspective on how data choices are presented and intervene on individual behaviors remain underexplored. In this paper, we focus on pre-donation data exploration, a key stage for adequately and meaningful informed participation. Through a real-world data donation study (N=24), we evaluated three data exploration interventions (self-focused, social comparison, collective-only). Findings show choice framing impacts donation participation. The "social comparison" design (87.5%) outperformed the "self-focused view" (62.5%) while a "collective-only" frame (37.5%) backfired, causing "perspective confusion" and privacy concerns. This study demonstrates how strategic data framing addresses data donation as a behavioral challenge, revealing design's critical yet underexplored role in data donation for participatory public sector innovation.
Which persuasion strategies, if any, are associated with donation compliance? Answering this requires fine-grained strategy labels across a full corpus and statistical tests corrected for multiple comparisons. We annotate all 10,600 persuader turns in the 1,017-dialogue PersuasionForGood corpus (Wang et al., 2019), where donation outcomes are directly observable, with a taxonomy of 41 strategies in 11 categories, using three open-source large language models (LLMs; Qwen3:30b, Mistral-Small-3.2, Phi-4). Strategy categories alone explain little variance in donation outcome (pseudo $R^2 \approx 0.015$, consistent across all three annotators). Guilt Induction is the only strategy significantly associated with lower donation rates ($Δ\approx -23$ percentage points), an effect that replicates across all three models despite only moderate inter-model agreement. Reciprocity is the most robust positive correlate. Target sentiment and interest predict whether a donation occurs but show at most a weak correlation with donation amount. These findings suggest that strategy identification alone is insufficient to explain persuasion effectiveness, and that guilt-based appeals may be counterproduc
Energy is a fundamental component of modern life, driving nearly all aspects of daily activities. As such, the inability to access energy when needed is a significant issue that requires innovative solutions. In this paper, we propose ED-DAO, a novel fully transparent and community-driven decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) designed to facilitate energy donations. We analyze the energy donation process by exploring various approaches and categorizing them based on both the source of donated energy and funding origins. We propose a novel Hybrid Energy Donation (HED) algorithm, which enables contributions from both external and internal donors. External donations are payments sourced from entities such as charities and organizations, where energy is sourced from the utility grid and prosumers. Internal donations, on the other hand, come from peer contributors with surplus energy. HED prioritizes donations in the following sequence: peer-sourced energy (P2D), utilitygrid-sourced energy (UG2D), and direct energy donations by peers (P2PD). By merging these donation approaches, the HED algorithm increases the volume of donated energy, providing a more effective means to address e
Civic AI systems increasingly support democratic participation, yet interactions with them may reveal sensitive political views, creating tension between improving AI models and residents' expectations of privacy and consent. This study examines the conditions of transparency and user control under which Swiss residents are willing to donate their anonymized chatbot conversations to train an open-source AI model. A 2x2 between-subjects factorial design evaluated how a Data Nutrition Label and a granular consent dashboard influence donation decisions. The experiment was delivered via a multilingual online survey featuring a custom chatbot powered by the Apertus-70B model. Analysis of the 205 participants revealed that neither transparency nor control significantly affected donation behavior. Rates were uniformly high (91.7% overall), producing a ceiling effect, and Bayesian checks confirmed the absence of treatment effects. The dashboard raised perceived control but not donation, and high-control participants actively restricted their data-use settings. A qualitative analysis of 120 open-ended responses indicates that residents framed donation as a contribution to the public good, m
Do people behave more favorably towards their in-group during a crisis? Defining in/out-groups by geography, we study donations to local versus non-local charities during the Covid pandemic. The evidence points to increased parochialism: We document a relative increase in donations to local charities and show that donors in high-Covid areas increased their local giving and became less responsive to international disasters. Increased local giving was most pronounced during the first year of the pandemic. Our interpretation is that greater parochialism in donations was due to heightened concern about the immediate impact of Covid at a time when localities were salient.
Software systems rely heavily on open source software (OSS) libraries, which offer benefits but also pose risks. When vulnerabilities arise, the OSS community may struggle to address them due to inactivity or lack of resources. Research highlights the link between OSS maintenance and financial support. To sustain the OSS ecosystem, maintainers should register on donation platforms and link these profiles on their project pages, enabling financial support from users and industry stakeholders. However, a detailed study on donation platform usage in OSS is missing. This study analyzes the adoption of donation platforms in the PyPI ecosystem. For each PyPI library, we retrieve assigned URLs, dependencies, and, when available, owner type and GitHub donation links. Using PageRank, we analyze different subsets of libraries from both a library and dependency chain perspective. Our findings reveal that donation platform links are often omitted from PyPI project pages and instead listed on GitHub repositories. GitHub Sponsors is the dominant platform, though many PyPI-listed links are outdated, emphasizing the need for automated link verification. Adoption rates vary significantly across lib
Background: Open source software (OSS) libraries are critical components of modern software systems, yet their metadata-particularly links to source code repositories and donation platforms-is often incomplete, outdated, or inconsistent. Such deficiencies hinder dependency monitoring, security assessment, and the sustainability of OSS projects. Aims: This study aims to explain notable metadata practices in PyPI libraries, focusing on platform dominance, outdated links, and missing references to repositories and donation platforms. As this investigation relies on large-scale qualitative survey data, we further evaluate the robustness and quality of the LLM-based topic modeling approach used to derive the findings. Method: We conducted two surveys targeting PyPI authors and maintainers, collecting 1,776 open-ended responses. To analyze these responses, we developed a LLM-based topic modeling pipeline using LLaMA 3.3 70B, including preprocessing, topic extraction, and topic merging. Robustness was assessed across 30 repeated runs using Jaccard and cosine similarity, while topic quality was evaluated by 23 experts using a structured assessment framework and Randolph's Kappa. Results: T
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly regarded as having the potential to generate persuasive content at scale. While previous studies have focused on the risks associated with LLM-generated misinformation, the role of LLMs in enabling prosocial persuasion is still underexplored. We investigate whether donation appeals authored by LLMs are as effective as those written by humans across degrees of personalization. Two preregistered online experiments (Study 1: N = 658; Study 2: N = 642) manipulated Personalization (generic vs. personalized vs. falsely personalized) and Content source (human vs. LLM) and presented participants with donation appeals for charities. We assessed how participants distributed their bonus money across the charities, how they engaged with the donation appeals, and how persuasive they found them. In both experiments, LLM-generated content yielded statistically significantly higher donation amounts than human-authored content, although the absolute differences were small; it also resulted in higher engagement and was rated as more persuasive. There was a gain associated with personalization (Study 2) and a penalty for false personalization (Study 1). O
Blood donation is a critical component of healthcare, yet locating suitable donors in emergencies often presents significant challenges. This paper presents the design and development of a Blood Donation Web Platform, a web-based system that connects patients, donors, and administrators within a centralized digital space. The platform allows interested donors to register their personal information, including blood group, contact details, and availability. Patients can search for donors based on blood group and location, and the system provides a list of nearby donors who are ready to donate. The platform design was guided by use case, database, class, and sequence diagrams to ensure a well-structured and efficient system architecture. Modern web technologies, including PHP (Laravel framework), HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, and MySQL, supported by XAMPP and Visual Studio Code, were employed to implement a dynamic, interactive, and user-friendly platform. By streamlining donor refgistration, blood requests, and communication, the proposed system reduces delays and complexities in emergencies, improving timely accessibility of blood and enhancing overall efficiency in blood donation services.
Cooperating first then mimicking the partner's act has been proven to be effective in utilizing reciprocity in social dilemmas. However, the extent to which this, called Tit-for-Tat strategy, should be regarded as equivalent to unconditional cooperators remains controversial. Here, we introduce a biased Tit-for-Tat (T) strategy that cooperates differently toward unconditional cooperators (C) and fellow T players through independent bias parameters. The results show that, even under strong dilemmas in the donation game framework, this three-strategy system can exhibit diverse phase diagrams on the parameter plane. In particular, when T-bias is small and C-bias is large, a ``hidden T phase'' emerges, in which the weakest T strategy dominates. The dominance of the weakened T strategy originates from a counterintuitive mechanism characterizing non-transitive ecological systems: T suppresses its relative fitness to C, rapidly eliminates the cyclic dominance clusters, and subsequently expands slowly to take over the entire population. Analysis in well-mixed populations confirms that this phenomenon arises from structured populations. Our study thus reveals the subtle role of bias regulat
Global demand for donated blood far exceeds supply, and unmet need is greatest in low- and middle-income countries; experts suggest that large-scale coordination is necessary to alleviate demand. Using the Facebook Blood Donation tool, we conduct the first large-scale algorithmic matching of blood donors with donation opportunities. While measuring actual donation rates remains a challenge, we measure donor action (e.g., making a donation appointment) as a proxy for actual donation. We develop automated policies for matching donors with donation opportunities, based on an online matching model. We provide theoretical guarantees for these policies, both regarding the number of expected donations and the equitable treatment of blood recipients. In simulations, a simple matching strategy increases the number of donations by 5-10%; a pilot experiment with real donors shows a 5% relative increase in donor action rate (from 3.7% to 3.9%). When scaled to the global Blood Donation tool user base, this corresponds to an increase of around one hundred thousand users taking action toward donation. Further, observing donor action on a social network can shed light onto donor behavior and respo
With the widespread use of social media, organizations, and individuals use these platforms to raise funds and support causes. Unfortunately, this has led to the rise of scammers in soliciting fraudulent donations. In this study, we conduct a large-scale analysis of donation-based scams on social media platforms. More specifically, we studied profile creation and scam operation fraudulent donation solicitation on X, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and Telegram. By collecting data from 151,966 accounts and their 3,053,333 posts related to donations between March 2024 and May 2024, we identified 832 scammers using various techniques to deceive users into making fraudulent donations. Analyzing the fraud communication channels such as phone number, email, and external URL linked, we show that these scamming accounts perform various fraudulent donation schemes, including classic abuse such as fake fundraising website setup, crowdsourcing fundraising, and asking users to communicate via email, phone, and pay via various payment methods. Through collaboration with industry partners PayPal and cryptocurrency abuse database Chainabuse, we further validated the scams and measured the financial
Enabled by inverted-mode scanning tunneling microscopy (IM-STM) and the use of functionalized molecular tools, we demonstrate positionally-controlled mechanosynthetic addition (donation) of carbon and subtraction (abstraction) of silicon atoms on a model build site: atomically clean and crystalline Si(100). The resulting structures represent the first demonstrations of an emerging ability to manipulate radical chemistry with positional control of specific atoms and moieties in 3D. Furthermore, by comparing the behavior of molecular tools designed for atomic donation versus abstraction, we highlight general principles governing molecular tool design for selective and reliable mechanosynthetic functionality.
The donation game is a well-established framework for studying the emergence and evolution of cooperation in multi-agent systems. The cooperative behavior can be influenced by the environmental noise in partially observable settings and by the decision-making strategies of agents, which may incorporate not only reputation but also traits such as generosity and forgiveness. Traditional simulations often assume fully random interactions, where cooperation is tested between randomly selected agent pairs. In this paper, we investigate cooperation dynamics using the concept of Stephen Wolfram's one-dimensional binary cellular automata. This approach allows us to explore how cooperation evolves when interactions are limited to neighboring agents. We define binary cellular automata rules that conform to the donation game mechanics. Additionally, we introduce models of perceptual and action noise, along with a mutation matrix governing the probabilistic evolution of agent strategies. Our empirical results demonstrate that cooperation is significantly affected by agents' mobility and their spatial locality on the game board. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between
Blood Donation and Blood Transfusion Services (BTS) are crucial for saving people lives. Recently, worldwide efforts have been undertaken to utilize social media and smartphone applications to make the blood donation process more convenient, offer additional services, and create communities around blood donation centers. Blood banks suffer frequent shortage of blood; hence, advertisements are frequently seen on social networks urging healthy individuals to donate blood for patients who urgently require blood transfusion. The blood donation process usually consumes a lot of time and effort from both donors and medical staff since there is no concrete information system that allows donors and blood donation centers communicate efficiently and coordinate with each other to minimize time and effort required for blood donation process. Moreover, most blood banks work in isolation and are not integrated with other blood donation centers and health organizations which affect the blood donation and blood transfusion services quality. This work aims at developing a Blood Donation System (BDS) based on the cutting-edge information technologies of cloud computing and mobile computing.
Personalized medicine has gained much popularity recently as a way of providing better healthcare by tailoring treatments to suit individuals. Our research, motivated by the UK INTERVAL blood donation trial, focuses on estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule (ITR) in the ordinal treatment-arms setting. Restrictions on minimum lengths between whole blood donations exist to safeguard donor health and quality of blood received. However, the evidence-base for these limits is lacking. Moreover, in England, the blood service is interested in making blood donation both safe and sustainable by integrating multi-marker data from INTERVAL and developing personalized donation strategies. As the three inter-donation interval options in INTERVAL have clear orderings, we propose a sequential re-estimation learning method that effectively incorporates "treatment" orderings when identifying optimal ITRs. Furthermore, we incorporate variable selection into our method for both linear and nonlinear decision rules to handle situations with (noise) covariates irrelevant for decision-making. Simulations demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods that assume multiple nominal
A donation-tracking system leveraging smart contracts and blockchain technology holds transformative potential for reshaping the landscape of charitable giving, especially within the context of Web 3.0. This paper explores how smart contracts and blockchain can be used to create a transparent and secure ledger for tracking charitable donations. We highlight the limitations of traditional donation systems and how a blockchain-based system can help overcome these challenges. The functionality of smart contracts in donation tracking, offering advantages such as automation, reduced transaction fees, and enhanced accountability, is elucidated. The decentralized and tamper-proof nature of blockchain technology is emphasized for increased transparency and fraud prevention. While elucidating the benefits, we also address challenges in implementing such a system, including the need for technical expertise and security considerations. By fostering trust and accountability, a donation-tracking system in Web 3.0, empowered by smart blockchain networks, aims to catalyze a profound positive impact in the realm of philanthropy.
Food banks are crucial for alleviating food insecurity, but their effectiveness hinges on accurately forecasting highly volatile in-kind donations to ensure equitable and efficient resource distribution. Traditional forecasting models often fail to maintain consistent accuracy due to unpredictable fluctuations and concept drift driven by seasonal variations and natural disasters such as hurricanes in the Southeastern U.S. and wildfires in the West Coast. To address these challenges, we propose FoodRL, a novel reinforcement learning (RL) based metalearning framework that clusters and dynamically weights diverse forecasting models based on recent performance and contextual information. Evaluated on multi-year data from two structurally distinct U.S. food banks-one large regional West Coast food bank affected by wildfires and another state-level East Coast food bank consistently impacted by hurricanes, FoodRL consistently outperforms baseline methods, particularly during periods of disruption or decline. By delivering more reliable and adaptive forecasts, FoodRL can facilitate the redistribution of food equivalent to 1.7 million additional meals annually, demonstrating its significant
Exploring measures to improve financial networks and mitigate systemic risks is an ongoing challenge. We study claims trading, a notion defined in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. For a bank $v$ in distress and a trading partner $w$, the latter is taking over some claims of $v$ and in return giving liquidity to $v$. The idea is to rescue $v$ (or mitigate contagion effects from $v$'s insolvency). We focus on the impact of trading claims fractionally, when $v$ and $w$ can agree to trade only part of a claim. In addition, we study donations, in which $w$ only provides liquidity to $v$. They can be seen as special claims trades. When trading a single claim or making a single donation in networks without default cost, we show that it is impossible to strictly improve the assets of both banks $v$ and $w$. Since the goal is to rescue $v$ in distress, we study creditor-positive trades, in which $v$ improves and $w$ remains indifferent. We show that an optimal creditor-positive trade that maximizes the assets of $v$ can be computed in polynomial time. It also yields a (weak) Pareto-improvement for all banks in the entire network. In networks with default cost, we obtain a trade in po
Social norm interventions are used promote prosocial behaviors by highlighting prevalent actions, but their effectiveness is often limited in heterogeneous populations where shared understandings of desirable behaviors are lacking. This study explores whether multi-agent systems can establish "virtual social norms" to encourage donation behavior. We conducted an online experiment where participants interacted with a group of agents to discuss donation behaviors. Changes in perceived social norms, conformity, donation behavior, and user experience were measured pre- and postdiscussion. Results show that multi-agent interactions effectively increased perceived social norms and donation willingness. Notably, in-group agents led to stronger perceived social norms, higher conformity, and greater donation increases compared to out-group agents. Our findings demonstrate the potential of multi-agent systems for creating social norm interventions and offer insights into leveraging social identity dynamics to promote prosocial behavior in virtual environments.