Most mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients require sedation and analgesia for comfort. Current usual care is propofol-based sedation plus an opioid analgesic. The alpha2 agonists dexmedetomidine and clonidine are potential alternative sedatives, but their clinical and cost-effectiveness are uncertain. To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of alpha2 agonists (dexmedetomidine and clonidine) compared with propofol for sedating adult intensive care unit patients. Pragmatic open-label three-arm trial. Embedded process and economic evaluation. Forty-one intensive care units in the UK. Recruitment from December 2018 to October 2023. Participants were 1437 adults within 48 hours of starting mechanical ventilation expected to require ≥ 48 hours of mechanical ventilation [analysis population: propofol (N = 471), dexmedetomidine (N = 457), and clonidine-based (N = 476) sedation]. Median time from intubation to randomisation was 21.0 (first, third quartile: 13.2, 31.3) hours. In all groups, bedside algorithms targeted a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale of -2 to + 1 unless clinicians requested deeper sedation. Intervention groups' algorithms supported alpha2-agonist up-titration and propofol down-titration followed by sedation primarily with allocated alpha2 agonist. Supplemental propofol was permitted if required. Primary outcome was time to successful extubation, analysed allowing for death as a competing risk. Secondary outcomes included mortality, sedation quality, rates of delirium and cardiovascular adverse events. Long-term outcomes included: experience of intensive care unit care; anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress; cognitive function; health-related quality of life. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 59.2 (14.9) years; 901 (65%) male. The sub-distribution hazard ratio for time to successful extubation for dexmedetomidine versus propofol was 1.09 (95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.25; p = 0.20) and for clonidine versus propofol was 1.05 (0.95 to 1.17; p = 0.34), with hazard ratio > 1 favouring alpha2 agonist. Median (95% confidence interval) hours from randomisation to successful extubation was: propofol 162 (136 to 170); dexmedetomidine 136 (117 to 150); and clonidine 146 (124 to 168). There was no effect interaction with age, sepsis status, median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score, or median Prediction of Delirium in intensive care unit patients' delirium risk score. Delirium rates were similar, but agitation occurred at higher rate than propofol with both alpha2 agonists [dexmedetomidine vs. propofol risk ratio (95% confidence intervals) 1.54 (1.21 to 1.97); clonidine vs. propofol 1.55 (1.22 to 1.97)]. Rates of severe bradycardia (rate < 50/minute) were higher with both alpha2 agonists compared with propofol [dexmedetomidine vs. propofol rate ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.62 (1.36 to 1.93); clonidine vs. propofol 1.58 (1.33 to 1.88)]. Mortality was similar over 180 days follow-up [dexmedetomidine vs. propofol hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.98 (0.77 to 1.24); clonidine vs. propofol 1.04 (0.82 to 1.31)]. Process evaluation indicated a range of contextual factors at intensive care unit and individual level that influenced intervention delivery, including: intensive care unit culture, prior clinician opinions/beliefs, staffing pressures (exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic), clinician experience and concerns about alpha2-agonist side effects. There was no difference in cost-effectiveness between the groups. This was a pragmatic unblinded trial, with associated risk of performance and ascertainment bias. Future trials should explore the effectiveness of alpha2 agonists as sedatives in other populations, for example paediatric critical care and acute brain injury. In mechanically ventilated critically ill patients, neither dexmedetomidine- nor clonidine-based sedation was superior for major clinical outcomes or more cost-effective compared with propofol-based sedation. This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/93/01. Intensive care unit patients needing support from breathing machines need medications (sedatives and painkillers) to keep them comfortable. There is evidence that keeping people as awake as possible during care helps them recover, but the best way to achieve this is uncertain. This programme of work compared the use of propofol (currently the most widely used sedative) with two drugs called ‘alpha2 agonists’ (dexmedetomidine and clonidine). Some evidence suggests alpha2 agonists have advantages over propofol, by enabling patients to be more awake and comfortable on the breathing machine. They may also decrease confusion (delirium), which is common and distressing during intensive care unit care. However, there are also concerns that these drugs, especially dexmedetomidine, may not be safe for some patients. In a large trial randomising patients to receive either propofol (usual care) or dexmedetomidine or clonidine as their main sedative (with additional propofol if required), we found no important differences in the time taken to come off the breathing machine. Most measures of patient comfort were similar, but more patients experienced agitation with both dexmedetomidine and clonidine. These sedatives caused higher rates of abnormally slow heart rate compared with propofol, which was a concern to medical and nursing staff caring for patients. We found no important differences in patient survival or well-being during 6 months’ follow-up, and no evidence that either drug offers better value for money if used as the main sedation agent compared with propofol. Our work suggests we should not use alpha2agonists as the main sedative for all intensive care unit patients. There is some uncertainty about our findings, because we found issues like clinician experience and pre-existing beliefs and concerns about alpha2 agonists influenced how they were used. We also cannot exclude that they may have advantages in specific patients based on individual clinicians’ judgement.
The partograph is a World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended tool for monitoring labor and supporting timely clinical decisions. Despite its importance, its use remains suboptimal in many low- and middle-income settings, with persistent gaps between knowledge and practice. Evidence from Iran across different categories of birth attendants is limited. This study therefore assessed partograph use among midwives, obstetrics residents, and midwifery students, and its association with selected maternal and neonatal outcomes in teaching hospitals in Ahvaz, southwest Iran. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 in four teaching hospitals in Ahvaz, southwest Iran. A total of 155 birth attendants completed self-administered knowledge and attitude questionnaires. The practice of the birth attendants during 371 deliveries was evaluated through direct observation by a researcher, using a standardized observational checklist with predefined criteria. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, and chi-square and one-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests were applied, with statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.05. The mean knowledge score of the participants was 15.04, and there was no significant statistical difference between the three groups birth attendants in this regard (P = 0.230). The mean attitude score was 69.00. 66% of the participants had a positive attitude towards the partograph, and a significant statistical difference was observed between birth attendants (P = 0.001). Also, 57.2% of the partograph forms were not completed during labor, 39.6% were incomplete, and only 3.2% of the forms were completed fully and standardly. The chi-square test showed that there was a significant statistical relationship between the type of birth attendance and the completion of the partograph (p = 0.001). The duration of the first stage of labor, the 1st-minute Apgar score, postpartum hemorrhage, the need for resuscitation, and the need for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission were significantly associated with the completion of the partograph (P < 0.05). According to the results of this study, despite the acceptable knowledge and attitude scores of obstetric caregivers, the level of partograph use was still very low. Alongside continuous training, appropriate policy-making and structured implementation protocols are essential to ensure optimal partograph use and improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Japan Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) Patient and Family Group (J-MPS) was founded in 1986. It is the largest patient group for all types of MPS in Japan and now includes some of the patients with lysosomal storage diseases. Patients receive medical care but suffer from the daily progression of symptoms, holding a different assessment of treatment effectiveness than that considered by the medical professionals. This study summarises the annual reports of the society and the results of periodic surveys conducted by their own. The 20-year annual reports are based on J-MPS membership records since 2005. The three questionnaire surveys were planned, designed, and conducted by the patient association own. Survey I was conducted mainly about treatment and activities of daily living with MPS I, II, IVA, and VI for which ERTs are available. Survey II asked about current symptoms and medical care with MPS IIIA and IIIB. Survey III was focused on ocular complications and skeletal symptoms with all types of MPS. MPS II is the most common type of membership, and the average age of members is gradually increasing over the year. In MPS, age at diagnosis has decreased compared to previous surveys. Even though enzyme replacement therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have improved symptoms, there is a slight discrepancy between improvement and patient satisfaction. The degree of need for assistance in life varies with the disease type. Decreased bone mineral density and retinal pigmentary degeneration may be underestimated. This research is not physician-led evaluations, but patient-driven surveys, which is significant in that it focuses on the problems faced by patients and their families in the current era when enzyme replacement therapies are available. Coordination among patients, families, health care providers, and physicians is important to improve patients' quality of life.
暂无摘要(点击查看详情)
Methadone is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet its impact is constrained by low rates of treatment initiation and retention, driven in part by geographic inequalities in the availability of methadone-providing opioid treatment programs (OTPs) and restrictions on the types of clinical settings where methadone can be dispensed. In response, in July 2021, the Drug Enforcement Administration released a new rule allowing OTPs to dispense medications for OUD-including methadone-through mobile medication units (MMU) without the need for additional treatment waivers. We conducted interviews with 11 participants living in a residential substance use treatment facility in NYC and receiving methadone treatment (MT) from an MMU. Interview data were coded using Dedoose software based on a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies, and guided by a thematic approach to explore patient's treatment experiences and perceptions. Participants described MMU as substantially reducing the logistical burden of treatment while also allowing patients to avoid problems associated with brick-and-mortar OTPs. Some raised minor complaints (i.e., additional waiting time on medication delivery days), yet participants framed these concerns within the context of their overall preference for MMU. Participants also expressed uncertainty about how methadone treatment would continue after leaving residential care, highlighting potential challenges in transitioning from mobile services to traditional clinic settings. Our findings provide qualitative evidence from patients' perspectives on how mobile methadone delivery can potentially reshape the logistical demands, treatment environments, and continuity-of-care challenges associated with methadone treatment in residential settings.
Masters Swimming is a rapidly expanding sector of competitive aquatic sport and provides structured opportunities for adults to maintain long-term engagement in high-level swimming. Despite extensive global participation, limited evidence exists regarding the national origins of the most frequent Masters swimmers among the top-ten performers across all strokes, distances, and age groups. Previous research has focused primarily on isolated disciplines or open-water events. This study aimed to investigate participation and performance patterns of Masters swimmers competing at the World Masters and World Aquatics Championships from 1986 to 2024, with a specific focus on national patterns among top performers. A total of 204,005 long-course (50 m) swimming performance entries (94,312 women and 109,693 men) from 1986 to 2024 were extracted from the official World Aquatics archive and analyzed. The unit of analysis was the annual top-ten entries for each stroke, distance, sex, and age group, with each result treated as an independent performance record. Statistical differences between nationalities were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni post-hoc adjustments. Descriptive data were presented using mean, standard deviation, and confidence intervals. Success was operationally defined as the frequency of a nation's appearances in the annual top-ten fastest times for each stroke, distance, and sex. For descriptive purposes, nationalities were grouped into six categories: the top-five nationalities with the most appearances in the top-ten fastest times regarding the different swimming strokes and sex separately by distances and for each competition year, as well as one group of all other nationalities. Among women, German swimmers were the most numerous in the top-ten for breaststroke, butterfly, and 50 m backstroke. Among men, however, U.S. swimmers were the most frequently represented across almost all distances and strokes, except for the successes of Brazilian athletes in the 50 m backstroke and Russian swimmers in the 50 m breaststroke. Across all years and disciplines, the most recurrent top-ten Masters swimmers came from the USA, Germany, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, and Brazil ("Big Six"). Performance differences between nationalities were significant across multiple events, with notable strengths among Russian swimmers in breaststroke and freestyle sprint events. The United States demonstrated the broadest and most consistent numerical superiority in Masters swimming performance over the 38-year period, by fielding the most frequent athletes among the top-ten performers, particularly among men. German women displayed exceptional success in breaststroke and butterfly, accounting for the majority of the athletes in the top-ten. These findings highlight persistent geographic patterns in Masters swimming excellence and may guide future research on environmental, sociocultural, training, and demographic factors contributing to national performance patterns.
This study explores carers' experiences of engagement with mental healthcare workers in public inpatient mental health services to better understand how carers can be optimally supported to contribute to recovery-oriented care. An exploratory qualitative descriptive study. We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten carers using a reflexive thematic analysis that emphasised systematic coding and reflexivity to enhance rigour. Three overarching themes were identified, including: Exclusion and tokenism, which captures carers' experiences of limited inclusion and superficial participation in inpatient mental health services; Fractured and medicalised system, which highlights the disconnect between the rhetoric of recovery and the reality of highly medicalised and risk-averse practice; and Occasional care, which describes genuine collaboration and shared understanding between carers and mental healthcare workers that are intermittently present, supporting trust and hope in some instances, but absent in others. Carers experience significant challenges when engaging with mental healthcare workers. The findings suggest the need for a genuine transformation of mental health systems and practice, with meaningful carer engagement central to relational recovery and recovery-oriented care. Findings from this study indicate that carers often lack consistent recognition and access to appropriate support, needed to fulfil their potential in supporting recovery. Strengthening formal support pathways for carers is therefore essential to promoting recovery that is relational, sustainable and shared. A professional carer peer worker was consulted on the development of the study design and questions. Carers participated through in-depth interviews.
暂无摘要(点击查看详情)
Adhesions are a common complication following surgery, and they can cause significant morbidity. However, adhesions are not easily diagnosed with imaging, and often only become apparent when they cause intestinal obstruction symptoms. The pathophysiology of adhesion formation is complex, thus despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care, adhesions remain a persistent problem in clinical practice. Despite evidence for efficacy of some strategies in reducing adhesion formation question remain regarding the indications and impact on clinically relevant outcomes. The paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a thorough examination of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying adhesion formation and assess the efficacy of existing preventive strategies to guide future research and clinical practice in the management of adhesions. Study design and Framework This position paper was developed in accordance with the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) methodology for consensus-based guidelines. The objective was to synthesize current evidence on adhesion pathophysiology and translate it into a clinically applicable "Narrative". Expert Panel Selection and Composition: The expert panel was composed of international specialists in general, trauma, and emergency surgery. Experts were selected based on their clinical leadership and academic contributions to the fields of peritoneal surgery and postoperative complication management. The panel included senior representatives from major surgical departments in Singapore (Sengkang and Singapore General Hospital), The Netherlands (Radboud University), and Italy (University of Bologna and Bufalini Hospital). Literature Search and Evidence Synthesis: A comprehensive search was conducted across major medical databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library) to identify literature concerning the pathophysiology and prevention of adhesions. The search strategy employed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) descriptors and keywords including: "peritoneal adhesions," "postoperative adhesions," "adhesion prevention," "adhesion barriers," "carboxymethylcellulose," "hyaluronic acid," "icodextrin," "oxidized regenerated cellulose," "polyethylene glycol," "adhesive small bowel obstruction," "adhesiolysis". No language restrictions were applied to the search strategy. A total of 56 studies were selected, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and retrospective cohort studies. The panel focused on clinically relevant outcomes, specifically looking for evidence that connected interventions to reduced rates of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) and reoperation. Studies were screened based on their ability to address three specific pillars: surgical approach (MIS vs. Open), technical manoeuvres (haemostasis and tissue handling), and the use of mechanical or chemical adjuncts. Consensus Achievement and Formulation: The recommendations were developed through a structured, iterative revision process: Literature Synthesis: Lead authors performed the primary review and drafted the pathophysiological and preventative sections. Internal Peer Review: The manuscript underwent rigorous revision by the international expert panel to reach a consensus on the position statements. Final Validation: All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript and the resulting "Bundle" recommendations to ensure they were supported by the cited data. A total of 56 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been included in this paper to be discussed. Surgical techniques, as well as chemical and mechanical barriers were discussed in depth in this paper to come up with the recommendation. The WSES expert panel suggests the following bundle to reduce postoperative peritoneal adhesions: Bundle 1: Whenever possible, opt for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or laparoscopic procedures. Bundle 2: Good surgical techniques. Bundle 3: Utilise barriers.
Poor operating room (OR) ergonomics pose risk of injury to OR staff, worsening patient outcomes and threatening workforce wellness and sustainability. How OR staff navigate ergonomic barriers in the interdisciplinary team environment was examined in this qualitative study. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews of surgeons, anaesthesiologists and OR nurses were conducted at single institution using a socio-material approach with interview-to-the-double. Transcripts were coded by two independent researchers. Themes in the data were outlined using the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework. Five major themes were identified. First, physical environment issues creating cognitive and physical frictions, such as tripping hazards and improper room layouts. Second, influence of social positionality, with hierarchy by role and experience and social dynamics leading to differential capacity to adjust. Third, team collaboration, with lack of interdisciplinary work and communication and high staff turnover. Fourth, burden of self-initiated work arounds, outlining conflict between system/organizational issues but individual solutions. Fifth, institutional support, with lack of leadership engagement. Participants suggested solutions including accommodations to foster a collaborative approach to managing discomfort in the OR, and new team communication tools. Ergonomic barriers were described within the work system of the SEIPS framework. Social positionality and differential levels of agency, as well as lack of team collaboration and misperceptions of others' roles, were central to ergonomic challenges. Conflicts between problems lying with the system/organization, but solution being left to individuals, were also central to challenges to optimal OR ergonomics. Operating rooms are tough places to work. Staff spend long hours in cramped spaces, holding awkward positions around heavy equipment and tangled cables. Most develop pain or injuries. Up to 100% of surgeons and 98% of anaesthesiologists report muscle or joint problems. When staff are in pain or distracted by hazards, the risk of mistakes during surgery goes up. To understand how surgeons, nurses, and anaesthesiologists deal with physical strain at work and what gets in the way of making the operating room safer. Twenty-four staff members were interviewed for this qualitative study at a large hospital in Toronto, Canada (10 anaesthesiologists, nine surgeons, and five nurses). They were asked to describe a typical day in detail. Two researchers reviewed the interviews and identified common themes. Five main issues were found. First, rooms are cluttered with unneeded equipment, and cables on the floor are constant tripping hazards. Second, there is a clear pecking order. Surgeons’ needs tend to come first. Nurses often wait for surgeons to suggest a break, even when in pain. Junior staff across all roles push through discomfort rather than speak up, because doing so carries real risk. Third, teamwork helps but is inconsistent. When people talk about physical needs, solutions emerge, but these conversations rarely happen. Fourth, staff are left to solve problems alone by creating personal fixes for issues that come from the hospital system, not from individuals. Fifth, staff feel unsupported by leadership, who they believe care more about efficiency and financial targets than worker safety. Worker safety in the operating room depends on how the team works together, who has the power to speak up, and whether the hospital takes responsibility. Right now, most solutions fall on individuals even though the problems come from the system. Hospitals need to invest in better equipment, stable teams, and a culture where everyone feels safe to speak up.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. While advances in treatment have improved outcomes, the greatest gains in public health will come from primary prevention. Risk stratification is the foundation of CVD prevention. Traditional tools, such as pooled cohort equations (PCEs) and SCORE2, do not capture non-traditional risk factors and individual variability, driving efforts to refine existing approaches. We critically discuss emerging risk determinants for primary CVD prevention. Coronary artery calcium scoring can reclassify CVD risk but has limitations related to cost, access, and unvalidated improvements in clinical endpoints. Biomarkers such as apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) may identify residual risk beyond LDL-C, particularly in patients with lipid discordance, but remain underused due to uncertain thresholds and the lack of prospective triallevel outcome data. Trials of colchicine in primary prevention have yielded mixed results, making the role of targeting inflammation unclear in CVD prevention. Polygenic risk scores can stratify genetic risk but face challenges in sensitivity, specificity, and generalizability. Multiomics approaches, while offering the promise of deeper phenotyping, lack established clinical applications and consensus on when their use is appropriate. Artificial intelligence may allow better prediction across cohorts but requires broader validation. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, a marker of inflammation and age-related CVD risk, lacks evidence supporting routine screening or intervention in younger, asymptomatic individuals. The proliferation of new risk stratification tools poses a key challenge: determining when additional data meaningfully alter clinical decisions. Until robust outcome-based evidence emerges, risk enhancers should guide, but not dictate, therapy in selected patients.
Most results for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for acromegaly patients come from Gamma-Knife series. We aim to describe outcomes for LINAC-based SRT, as well as compare results for single-dose (SRS) and fractionated (SFRT) treatments. Single-center retrospective cohort in a tertiary, academic hospital assessed between 2008 and 2024. A total of 48 patients were assessed for outcomes of acromegaly after SRT. Most of them female (62.5%). Mean age was 42.5 years (range 12-73). Median lesion size was 2.1 cm (range 0.2 to 7.2 cm). Among previous deficits, previous hormonal deficits (31.3%) and visual deficits (45.8%) were common. Most patients were diagnosed with pure somatotrophic lesions (87.5%). SRS was done in 16 (33.3%) patients and 32 (66.7%) underwent SFRT. Concurrent octreotide long-acting release (Oct-LAR) (29/60.4%) and cabergoline (20/41.7%) were also common. Median follow-up was 85.3 months (8.2-187.9 months). Tumor control was achieved in 47 (97.9%). Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 85.3 months (92.4 months for SRS and 81.7 months for SFRT, p  = 0.42). Univariate analysis showed no variable impacted overall survival (OS), PFS, new visual, or new hormonal disorders. Hormonal remission was achieved in 22 (45.8%) patients. Median time to hormonal disease control (THC) was 73.1 months for the entire cohort, and 45.8 months for SRS patients and 74.7 months for SFRT patients, with no difference between groups ([HR], 0.30; 95% CI, -1.14 to 0.53; p  = 0.47). We described acromegaly patients treated with LINAC SRS and with the current criteria for hormonal cure. THC was longer for SFRT patients, with no statistical differences. Concurrent treatment did not impact outcomes.
Registries have long been a cornerstone of medical research and public health, providing systematically collected data on diseases, treatments, and health outcomes. However, in the era of digital health, we argue that the traditional model of stand-alone registries needs reconsideration, given the context of increasingly digitized and interoperable health data ecosystems. Unless registries evolve to embrace embedded, standards-based data services, operating across interoperable infrastructure, they will become obsolete while digitalization is reshaping how data can be collected, shared, and used. In this viewpoint, we recount how the present health data ecosystem came to be and what role registries have come to play therein. Following that, we show how recent regulatory initiatives such as the Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement in the United States or the European Health Data Space Regulation signal a shift toward cross-network health information exchange, promoting patient-centric data integration within electronic health record systems. We further illustrate how electronic health records are consequently set to evolve into information hubs, acting as the primary gateway for individuals through which they may access and control their personal health data spread throughout increasingly connected health data ecosystems. This, in turn, might stimulate the creation of digital twins and continuous learning health systems in practice. Following this line of thought, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of interconnected health data ecosystems. Ultimately, we propose that next-generation registries need to be designed as dynamic, service-oriented software stacks for research, leveraging the common data infrastructures that are currently being established around the world. Given the points raised in this viewpoint, we invite health care professionals and researchers alike to equally rethink the role that registries should play within the globally emerging interconnected health data ecosystems and contribute their findings. References included in this viewpoint were identified through searches of PubMed and Google Scholar with various search terms and combinations thereof pertinent to the topics touched on, for example, "patient registry," "clinical registry," "digital twin," "healthcare," "clinical research," "virtual twin," "TEFCA," or "EHDS." Only papers in English were reviewed. The final reference list was generated on the basis of originality and relevance to the broad scope of topics covered in this viewpoint, aiming to present a balanced overview of topic-related findings and arguments.
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most dreaded complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), especially in patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma and a small main pancreatic duct. In this context, total pancreatectomy (TP) has been proposed to prevent the occurrence of POPF, although its metabolic consequences limit its widespread adoption. To compare the postoperative outcomes of PD and TP in patients at high risk of POPF, assessing morbidity, mortality, and metabolic consequences. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA recommendations, including comparative studies of PD versus TP in a high-risk population. The criteria analyzed included morbidity, mortality, oncological outcomes and the occurrence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellites. The available data suggest a reduction in overall morbidity and severe complications after TP, but at the cost of a high rate of postoperative diabetes mellites. Islet cell auto-transplantation (IAT) could mitigate these metabolic consequences, and has shown encouraging results on glycemia control and the preservation of residual insulin secretion. In patients at high risk of POPF, TP may be a pertinent alternative to PD, especially in complex anatomical or oncological situations. However, the metabolic benefit-risk balance needs to be carefully assessed, and strategies such as TP-IAT may improve functional outcomes. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed, including an accurate assessment of postoperative quality of life.
Tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, is effective for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, maintaining remission after TCZ withdrawal remains challenging, and the treatment duration required before discontinuation to minimize relapse risk is unclear. To identify a TCZ treatment-duration threshold before withdrawal that is associated with a lower risk of relapse in patients with RA. This was a retrospective study including 97 patients with RA who discontinued intravenous TCZ after stable disease control. We retrospectively analyzed 97 RA patients who achieved remission or low disease activity prior to TCZ withdrawal. The primary outcome was relapse within 12 months post-discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards regression identified independent predictors, while restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling assessed non-linear associations between treatment duration and relapse risk. A simplified risk stratification tool was developed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Among 97 patients with RA who discontinued TCZ after stable disease control, most were biologic-naïve (98.9%), the mean disease duration was 72.9 ± 52.7 months, and concomitant methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine were used in 73.2% and 47.4% of patients, respectively. During the 12-month follow-up, 54 patients (55.7%) relapsed. TCZ treatment duration was an independent protective factor (adjusted HR = 0.892 per month, p = 0.002), whereas anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity was associated with increased relapse risk (adjusted HR = 2.122, p = 0.031). RCS analysis demonstrated an L-shaped non-linear relationship, identifying an empirically derived duration threshold at approximately 200 days associated with lower relapse risk. A simplified score assigning 1 point each for ACPA positivity and TCZ duration < 200 days stratified patients into low- (0 points), intermediate- (1 point), and high-risk (2 points) groups, with relapse rates of 27.3%, 53.8%, and 91.7%, respectively; the model showed acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.76). Longer TCZ treatment duration and ACPA negativity were associated with a lower risk of relapse after TCZ withdrawal. An approximately 200-day treatment duration may serve as a clinically informative threshold for risk-stratified withdrawal decisions in routine practice, although disease control after withdrawal should be interpreted in the context of ongoing background therapy rather than confirmed drug-free remission. How long should tocilizumab be used before stopping in rheumatoid arthritis? Rheumatoid arthritis is a long-term condition in which the immune system attacks the joints, causing pain, swelling, and damage. Tocilizumab is a medicine that can control the disease well, but doctors and patients often face an important question: when can it be safely stopped? In this study, we reviewed 97 patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose disease was well controlled before they stopped tocilizumab. We then followed them for 12 months to see who remained stable and who had a return of symptoms. We found that a little more than half of the patients had a relapse within 1 year after stopping treatment. Two factors were especially important. First, patients who stayed on tocilizumab for a longer time were less likely to relapse. Second, patients who had a positive anti-citrullinated protein antibody blood test were more likely to relapse. Our analysis suggested that about 200 days of treatment may be an important time point. Patients who stopped treatment before this were much more likely to have their disease come back. We also developed a simple tool based on treatment duration and antibody status that could separate patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. These results suggest that stopping tocilizumab too early may increase the chance of relapse, especially in patients with a positive antibody test. This may help doctors and patients make more informed decisions about treatment withdrawal. However, because this was a single-center retrospective study, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Hawking radiation1-the emission of quantum particles at the event horizon of a black hole2-connects gravity with quantum mechanics and thermodynamics3-5. But Hawking radiation has never been observed in astronomy, only in laboratory analogues6-9, and the chances of ever observing it in space are astronomically small9. The energy of Hawking radiation must come from the gravitational field around the black hole2, but how field quanta generate Hawking quanta has been unknown. Here we report on experimental and theoretical evidence for the process that generates Hawking radiation in a fibre-optical analogue of the event horizon10,11. There, as in gravity2, it has been believed that Hawking radiation comes from a complicated, cascaded process12; here we have identified theoretically a simple, direct process and observed experimentally how this process reacts back onto the field. Our findings suggest an equally direct process for other laboratory analogues6-8,13-17 and perhaps also for gravitational fields, shedding light on how black holes might radiate.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, largely driven by inappropriate and excessive antibiotic use. Italy has historically reported antibiotic consumption rates above the European average, especially in primary care. In 2017, Italy implemented the National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (NAP-AMR), including targets for reducing overall community antibiotic and fluoroquinolone use. This study evaluated the impact of NAP-AMR on antibiotic consumption trends in Italian primary care from 1999 to 2024. Quasi-experimental interrupted time series study. Annual ECDC data were expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day. Total antibiotic consumption was analyzed for 1999-2024 and fluoroquinolone consumption for 2005-2024. Segmented linear regression with Newey-West standard errors estimated post-2017 changes in level and trend. Total systemic antibiotic consumption was the primary outcome, and fluoroquinolone consumption was the secondary outcome. Total antibiotic consumption showed a significant pre-intervention upward trend, increasing annually by 0.10 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (annual change = 0.096; p = 0.032; 95% CI: 0.014 to 0.178). NAP-AMR implementation was associated with a significant immediate reduction in total antibiotic use (mean level difference = -4.940; p = 0.003; 95% CI: -7.864 to -2.016), while the post-intervention slope change was not significant (annual change = 0.126; p = 0.606; 95% CI: -0.346 to 0.599). Fluoroquinolone consumption showed a significant pre-intervention upward trend (annual change = 0.039; p = 0.016; 95% CI: 0.011 to 0.066) and a significant immediate reduction (mean level difference = -1.079; p = 0.023; 95% CI: -1.910 to -0.248). The post-intervention trend was negative but not significant (annual change = -0.219; p = 0.096; 95% CI: -0.459 to 0.021). NAP-AMR was associated with immediate reductions in total antibiotic and fluoroquinolone consumption, but sustained trend changes were not statistically significant. No significant long-term trend change was observed, underscoring ongoing surveillance and future evaluation.
Adolescence is an important developmental period during which there are diverse changes in the brain and behavior. Goal-directed behaviors and the component processes underlying those behaviors improve during adolescence, including working memory, response inhibition, and reinforcement learning. At the same time there is substantial pruning of excitatory connections in prefrontal cortex and ongoing myelination of axons. However, psychiatric disorders also become increasingly prevalent in late adolescence and early adulthood. In this study, we develop computational models that suggest a hypothesis for how the ongoing changes in the brain can give rise to the increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders. We show that both myelination and pruning during adolescence lead to attractor landscapes in which strongly encoded memories, driven by three-factor learning rules that modulate Hebbian plasticity, come to dominate the landscape of brain activity, at the expense of weakly encoded memories. Pruning and myelination lead to large, strong attractors which, if they are related to aversive emotions, can drive intrusive thoughts and compulsions in obsessive compulsive disorder, rumination in depression, and aversive memories in post-traumatic stress disorder. The link between pruning, myelination and the emergence of dominant attractors for emotionally salient memories is well supported by the models. The way these effects map onto forebrain circuits requires more work.
The concept of at-homeness has been increasingly adopted in residential care to describe a metaphorical sense of being "at home". Within a sector often criticised for displacing residents from familiar environments, at-homeness has come to symbolise the ideal experiential outcome of care. Yet, despite a growing body of work enriching our understanding of what at-homeness entails, existing conceptualisations tend to overlook the processes through which at-homeness is personally and multiply constructed and are shaped predominantly by studies of older adults in long-term care contexts. To address these limitations, a qualitative study, employing a user-involved approach, was conducted in Hong Kong, incorporating in-depth interviews with 60 residents of mental health residential services and ethnographic observations across three hostels. Analysis shows that at-homeness is shaped through boundary-setting and bonding between the self and three arenas-social relations ("people"), material environments and temporal orientations. Residents interpreted core qualities of at-homeness across personal, relational, material and temporal dimensions and their constructions were guided by distinct logics involving self-appraisal, temporal integration, relational attunement and socio-cultural grounding. The study proposes an integrative framework that reframes at-homeness as a dynamic, negotiated process, offering new insights for advancing theory and strengthening methodological and practice approaches in residential care.
The human gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota has come to be recognized as a modulator of health. However, interest in fungi and their function as members of the microbiota has lagged behind interest in bacteria. Despite the lack of historical interest, fungi are prevalent in the human GI tract and have an outsized impact on host immunity. In this review, we aim to examine the associations and potential impact of yeasts on human health outcomes. This review summarizes the associations between yeasts and inflammatory bowel diseases, highlights the predictive service that yeasts may provide in cancer therapy, and explores the possibility of yeasts as therapeutic effectors. There remain significant challenges in data analysis and identifying the relevance of fungal morphology; however, the pathways for clinical translation open to yeasts in the GI tract make these challenges worth overcoming.