搜索结果：Productivity

Measured aggregate productivity and the income share of top earners are strongly and positively correlated in the Canadian data. Productivity slowdown since the early 2000s was accompanied with a flattening income share of top earners. Motivated by these facts, we study the role of firms' top-paid workers and worker matching in accounting for the slowdown of measured total factor productivity. We first estimate total factor productivity for Canadian firms in the period of 2003-2015, taking into account the assortative matching between top workers and non-top workers. Measured total factor productivity consists of the Hicks-neutral technology and the quality of top workers. Our estimation suggests that measured aggregate total factor productivity declined from 2003 to 2015, in line with that estimated by the statistical agency. The decline of measured productivity is entirely accounted for by the declining quality of top workers, while the Hicks-neutral technology improved. Both the within-firm changes and the cross-firm reallocation of top-worker quality are important in contributing to the decline of overall top-worker quality. We also discuss possible causes of declines in the qu

We introduce heterogeneous R&D productivities into an endogenous R&D network formation model, generalizing the framework of Goyal and Moraga-González (2001). Heterogeneous productivities endogenously create asymmetric gains from collaboration: less productive firms benefit disproportionately from links, while more productive firms exert greater R&D effort and incur higher costs. When productivity gaps are sufficiently large, more productive firms experience lower profits from collaborating with less productive partners. As a result, the complete network -- stable under homogeneity -- becomes unstable, and the positive assortative (PA) network, in which firms cluster by R&D productivity, emerges as pairwise stable. Using simulations, we show that the clustered structure delivers higher welfare than the complete network; nevertheless, welfare under this formation follows an inverted U-shape as the fraction of high-productivity firms increases, reflecting crowding-out effects at high fractions. Altogether, we uncover an R&D productivity puzzle: economies with higher average R&D productivity may exhibit lower welfare through (i) the formation of alternative stab

As the digital economy grows increasingly intangible, traditional productivity measures struggle to capture the true economic impact of artificial intelligence (AI). AI systems capable of cognitive work significantly enhance productivity, yet their contributions remain obscured within the residual category of Total Factor Productivity (TFP). This paper explores whether it is time for a conceptual shift to explicitly recognize "digital labor," the autonomous cognitive capability of AI, as a distinct factor of production alongside capital and human labor. We outline the unique economic properties of digital labor, including scalability, intangibility, self-improvement, rapid obsolescence, and elastic substitutability. By integrating digital labor into growth models (such as those by Solow and Romer), we demonstrate strategic implications for business leaders, including new approaches to productivity tracking, resource allocation, investment strategy, and organizational design. Ultimately, treating digital labor as an independent factor offers a clearer view of economic growth and helps organizations manage AI's transformative potential.

Generative AI (GenAI) tools are increasingly being adopted in software development as productivity aids, since there is evidence that GenAI tools can improve individual aspects of productivity. However, productivity is multidimensional; accelerating one aspect of work may simply shift effort to another. In this paper, we investigate how GenAI adoption affects different dimensions of developer productivity. We surveyed 415 software practitioners to understand how they perceive productivity changes associated with AI adoption, using the SPACE framework (Satisfaction and well-being, Performance, Activity, Communication and collaboration, and Efficiency and flow). Our results reveal systematic redistribution of effort across SPACE dimensions. While frequent GenAI users reported faster task completion and higher output volume, these gains were offset by increased code review burden, persistent cognitive load from output verification, and unchanged collaboration patterns. We further provide an empirical mapping between the challenges perceived by developers and potential strategies to mitigate them. Overall, our findings suggest that, at the current stage of GenAI adoption, perceived pro

Measuring individual productivity (or equivalently distributing the overall productivity) in a network structure of workers displaying peer effects has been a subject of ongoing interest in many areas ranging from academia to industry. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on cooperative game theory that takes into account the peer effects of worker productivity represented by a complete bipartite network of interactions. More specifically, we construct a series of cooperative games where the characteristic function of each coalition of workers is equal to the sum of each worker intrinsic productivity as well as the productivity of other workers within a distance discounted by an attenuation factor. We show that these (truncated) games are balanced and converge to a balanced game when the distance of influence grows large. We then provide an explicit formula for the Shapley value and propose an alternative coalitionally stable distribution of productivity which is computationally much more tractable than the Shapley value. Lastly, we characterize this alternative distribution based on three sensible properties of a logistic network. This analysis enhances our understandi

Production function estimates underpin the measurement of firm-level markups, allocative efficiency, and the productivity effects of policy interventions. Since Olley and Pakes (1996), every major proxy variable estimator has identified the production function through a first-order Markov assumption on unobserved productivity; I show that misspecification of this assumption generates persistent upward bias in the materials elasticity that propagates into overestimated markups and inflated treatment effects. I replace the Markov restriction with conditional independence across three intermediate input demands, a static condition grounded in input market segmentation, and establish nonparametric identification from a single cross-section. I develop a GMM estimator and establish consistency and asymptotic normality. Monte Carlo simulations confirm that the proposed estimator is unbiased across Markov and non-Markov environments, while the standard estimator exhibits persistent bias of up to 63 percent of the true materials elasticity. In 502 Japanese manufacturing industries, the proposed method yields systematically lower markups than the standard method across the entire distributio

In general, estimating software effort using a Use Case Point (UCP) size requires the use of productivity as a second prediction factor. However, there are three drawbacks to this approach: (1) there is no clear procedure for predicting productivity in the early stages, (2) the use of fixed or limited productivity ratios does not allow research to reflect the realities of the software industry, and (3) productivity from historical data is often challenging. The new UCP datasets now available allow us to perform further empirical investigations of the productivity variable in order to estimate the UCP effort. Accordingly, four different prediction models based on productivity were used. The results showed that learning productivity from historical data is more efficient than using classical approaches that rely on default or limited productivity values. In addition, predicting productivity from historical environmental factors is not often accurate. From here we conclude that productivity is an effective factor for estimating the software effort based on the UCP in the presence and absence of previous historical data. Moreover, productivity measurement should be flexible and adjusta

The expectation that scientific productivity follows regular patterns over a career underpins many scholarly evaluations. However, recent studies of individual productivity patterns reveal a puzzle: the average number of papers published per year robustly follows the ``canonical trajectory'' of a rapid rise followed by a gradual decline, yet only about 20\% of individual productivity trajectories follow this pattern. We resolve this puzzle by modeling scientific productivity as a random walk, showing that the canonical pattern can be explained as a decrease in the variance in changes to productivity in the early-to-mid career. By empirically characterizing the variable structure of 2,085 productivity trajectories of computer science faculty at 205 PhD-granting institutions, spanning 29,119 publications over 1980--2016, we (i) discover remarkably simple patterns in both early-career and year-to-year changes to productivity, and (ii) show that a random walk model of productivity both reproduces the canonical trajectory in the average productivity and captures much of the diversity of individual-level trajectories, including the lognormal distribution of cumulative productivity observ

Contemporary proof assistants impose restrictive syntactic guardedness conditions that reject many valid corecursive definitions. Existing approaches to overcome these restrictions present a fundamental trade-off between coverage and automation. We present Compositional Heterogeneous Productivity (CHP), a theoretical framework that unifies high automation with extensive coverage for corecursive definitions. CHP introduces heterogeneous productivity applicable to functions with diverse domain and codomain types, including non-coinductive types. Its key innovation is compositionality: the productivity of composite functions is systematically computed from their components, enabling modular reasoning about complex corecursive patterns. Building on CHP, we develop Coco, a corecursion library for Rocq that provides extensive automation for productivity computation and fixed-point generation.

We develop a method to estimate producers' productivity beliefs when output quantities and input prices are unobservable, and we use it to evaluate the market for science. Our model of researchers' labor supply shows how their willingness to pay for inputs reveals their productivity beliefs. We estimate the model's parameters using data from a nationally representative survey of researchers and find the distribution of productivity to be very skewed. Our counterfactuals indicate that a more efficient allocation of the current budget could be worth billions of dollars. There are substantial gains from developing new ways of identifying talented scientists.

We show that, in a market economy, the aggregate production level depends not only on the aggregate variables but also on the distribution of individual characteristics (e.g., productivity, credit limit, ...). We prove that, due to financial frictions, the equilibrium aggregate production may be non-monotonic in both individual productivity and credit limit. We provide conditions (based on exogenous parameters) under which this phenomenon happens. By consequence, improving productivity or relaxing credit limit of firms may not necessarily be beneficial to economic development.

A common expectation is that career productivity peaks rather early and then gradually declines with seniority. But whether this holds true is still an open question. Here we investigate the productivity trajectories of almost 8,500 scientists from over fifty disciplines using methods from time series analysis, dimensionality reduction, and network science, showing that there exist six universal productivity patterns in research. Based on clusters of productivity trajectories and network representations where researchers with similar productivity patterns are connected, we identify constant, u-shaped, decreasing, periodic-like, increasing, and canonical productivity patterns, with the latter two describing almost three-fourths of researchers. In fact, we find that canonical curves are the most prevalent, but contrary to expectations, productivity peaks occur much more frequently around mid-career rather than early. These results outline the boundaries of possible career paths in science and caution against the adoption of stereotypes in tenure and funding decisions.

We develop a novel methodology for the proxy variable identification of firm productivity in the presence of productivity-modifying learning and spillovers which facilitates a unified "internally consistent" analysis of the spillover effects between firms. Contrary to the popular two-step empirical approach, ours does not postulate contradictory assumptions about firm productivity across the estimation steps. Instead, we explicitly accommodate cross-sectional dependence in productivity induced by spillovers which facilitates identification of both the productivity and spillover effects therein simultaneously. We apply our model to study cross-firm spillovers in China's electric machinery manufacturing, with a particular focus on productivity effects of inbound FDI.

We develop a theoretical framework to investigate the link between rising scale economies and stagnating productivity. Our model features heterogeneous firms, imperfect competition, and firm selection. We demonstrate that scale economies generated by fixed costs have distinct impacts on aggregate productivity compared to those driven by returns to scale (slope of marginal cost). Using UK data, we estimate long-run increases in both fixed costs and returns to scale. Our model implies that this should increase aggregate productivity through improved firm selection and resource allocation. However, increasing markups can offset the productivity gain. Higher markups cushion low-productivity firms' revenues, allowing them to survive, and constrain firm output, which limits exploitation of scale economies.

In this paper I propose a new way of measuring linguistic productivity that objectively assesses the ability of an affix to be used to coin new complex words and, unlike other popular measures, is not directly dependent upon token frequency. Specifically, I suggest that linguistic productivity may be viewed as the probability of an affix to combine with a random base. The advantages of this approach include the following. First, token frequency does not dominate the productivity measure but naturally influences the sampling of bases. Second, we are not just counting attested word types with an affix but rather simulating the construction of these types and then checking whether they are attested in the corpus. Third, a corpus-based approach and randomised design assure that true neologisms and words coined long ago have equal chances to be selected. The proposed algorithm is evaluated both on English and Russian data. The obtained results provide some valuable insights into the relation of linguistic productivity to the number of types and tokens. It looks like burgeoning linguistic productivity manifests itself in an increasing number of types. However, this process unfolds in two

This paper investigates how productivity dispersion relates to input misallocation in European manufacturing. The model features staggered productivity shocks that create wedges between anticipated and realized productivity for any production input. Using European firm-level data from 2001-2017, I show that, under the maintained model, shocks realized after inputs are committed are the largest contributor to marginal revenue product dispersion for every input, accounting for 75% of the variance for materials, 37% for labor, and 18% for capital. These results are consistent with input misallocation in European manufacturing reflecting post-commitment productivity shocks more than persistent heterogeneity across firms.

We quantify the short-term impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on sales performance through a series of large-scale randomized field experiments involving millions of users and products at a leading cross-border online retail platform. Over 2023-2024, the platform integrated GenAI into seven consumer-facing business workflows spanning customer service, consumer-product matching, advertising, and seller services. We find that GenAI adoption increases sales in most workflows, with effects ranging from no detectable impact to $16.3\%$, depending on GenAI's marginal contribution relative to baseline firm practices. Across the four GenAI applications with positive sales effects, the implied annual incremental value is roughly $\$5-$an economically meaningful impact given the retailer's scale and the early stage of GenAI adoption. The gains operate primarily through higher conversion rates rather than larger cart values, consistent with GenAI improving the shopping experience by reducing search, information, communication, and personalization frictions. Importantly, these effects are not associated with worse post-purchase outcomes, as product return rates and customer r

This paper presents a novel AI-powered framework designed to streamline database management and query optimization for PostgreSQL systems. Structured in three phases: Natural Language to SQL Translation, Query Execution and Analysis, and Insight Generation, the approach empowers users with intuitive, intelligent interaction with databases. By leveraging advanced natural language processing and language models, the system enables non-technical users to extract meaningful insights from complex datasets, reducing the dependency on specialized DBAs. The framework also introduces iterative refinement of queries, automatic report generation, and support for temporal data forecasting. Experimental results demonstrate improved productivity, reduced query latency, and enhanced accuracy, validating the system's effectiveness across diverse business use cases. The solution was developed and evaluated at ABV-IIITM Gwalior, under the guidance of Prof. Dr. Arun Kuma

This longitudinal study explores persistence in research productivity over time. We examine the trajectories of the academic careers of 2,326 current full professors in 14 STEMM disciplines, studying their lifetime biographical histories and publication histories. Every full professor is compared in terms of productivity classes (top, middle, bottom) with their peers at earlier career stages. We used prestige-normalized productivity in which more weight is given to articles in high-impact than in low-impact journals, recognizing the highly stratified nature of academic science. Our results show that membership in top productivity classes is to a large extent determined by being in these classes earlier. Half of the current top productive full professors belonged to top productivity classes throughout their academic careers. Half of the top productive assistant professors continued as top productive associate professors, and half of the top productive associate professors continued as top productive full professors (52.6% and 50.8%). Top-to-bottom and bottom-to-top transitions in productivity classes occurred marginally. The combination of biographical and demographic data with raw

How does the number of collaborators affect individual productivity? Results of prior research have been conflicting, with some studies reporting an increase in individual productivity as the number of collaborators grows, while other studies showing that the {free-rider effect} skews the effort invested by individuals, making larger groups less productive. The difference between these schools of thought is substantial: if a super-scaling effect exists, as suggested by former studies, then as groups grow, their productivity will increase even faster than their size, super-linearly improving their efficiency. We address this question by studying two planetary-scale collaborative systems: GitHub and Wikipedia. By analyzing the activity of over 2 million users on these platforms, we discover that the interplay between group size and productivity exhibits complex, previously-unobserved dynamics: the productivity of smaller groups scales super-linearly with group size, but saturates at larger sizes. This effect is not an artifact of the heterogeneity of productivity: the relation between group size and productivity holds at the individual level. People tend to do more when collaborating