The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) is dedicated to ensuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee is composed of society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The American Cancer Society estimated that roughly 105,000 Americans would be diagnosed with colon cancer and 43,000 with rectal cancer, and that 53,200 deaths would be attributed to these cancers in the year 2020.1 In the United States, colorectal cancer remains the third most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death.2 Approximately nine of 10 patients with colorectal cancer are diagnosed at 50 years of age While the and of colorectal cancer are for 50 years of are on the for The of patients with colon cancer is by the at the of a for and treatment. is the for most patients with colon cancer, is most in the In the United of the international was and with of colon cancer, cancer colon cancer, and and of to the management of patients with colon cancer, are the of these guidelines and are addressed in American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) This is based on the colon cancer in with 10 and The with a of the of and and and the with the of clinical and the of and and to in to the of to with the and colorectal to and of to and colon to and with a of to inclusive of years to on with of in in that and in the of 10 for the of the These a of for the The by the who the that they to be most to the Clinical Practice and and a of individual for in the Clinical Practice Guidelines was on and practice guidelines. and quality was a of in the The was for the was and a was by the for of was the of and was regarding the the committee and the of the practice guidelines committee in of these guidelines to by the by the Clinical Practice Guidelines The was and by committee members and The was by the and in of the Colon and In Clinical Practice is was for and the have related to This to the of Guidelines for and in the Colon Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines is not in the should be of based on quality In patients with colon cancer, can in and of of based on The of patients with colon cancer should be and based on a of based on quality with colon cancer on by surgery. of based on with colon cancer should be for to to to of based on of of with of colon cancer should be in with the based on In patients with colon cancer and a is for and are for of based on quality In patients with colon cancer of the should be based on In patients with colon cancer, with to should be based on quality of In and should be of colon of based on quality The use of and be to for patients with colon of based on is not for colon cancer be in for patients with of based on cancers colon cancers that to and are with and with is of based on is for of colon cancer, is not of based on patients with a be and is on and of of based on quality colon cancer patients with colon cancer and with are to of based on quality Cancer In the of of the colon, with a for a procedure is of based on In patients with colorectal cancer with should be of a based on quality with In patients with colon cancer and colon cancer, is the treatment. of based on quality colon cancer in In patients with colon cancer and in in which is at is to is of based on and In patients with colon cancer and in the a based on quality for colon cancer not of based on on was use not for clinical and for colon cancer in that are to based on In and in expertise is a to for colon cancer is of based on high-quality The and quality of and can to most patients in most circumstances quality and with can to most patients in most circumstances quality and available high-quality with and best on circumstances quality with and with best on circumstances quality in the of and and be be of and of and quality of in clinical American of with The American Committee on Cancer of be of in of the the the to the of the is to be to are in any of are and all are is to are are are in are are to is to is to the is with American Committee on should be and and should be of based on and and of colorectal cancer for and of colorectal cancers in the United States, The and should of and age of and the of and should be about cancer and that be with of should be for that the colon cancer patients 50 to a with colon these patients do not have a clinical that is with cancer the that should be for all colon cancer Guidelines on the management of patients with colorectal cancer have by the In with the Cancer all diagnosed colon cancers should be for Colon cancer be by of in the in American have that of colon cancer of and cancers with with cancers that with of diagnosed cancers with in a and should be to management and for surgery. about and is these have to the of colorectal cancer and the of is colon cancer patients is patients with age and patients the on and not should for which and should a and a should be for colon cancer to a that is for and and to provide a for use of patients in the Cancer that is of in patients with to colon with a in the of with patients with a is the to best is not In colorectal cancer, a in in to with with of should be the colorectal should be for of based on the of colon cancer should be because to the of colon is the these circumstances because a to be with the clinical of to in which be in the clinical for that are not to a of the colorectal is to which are to be in of patients with to colon of the colorectal can that are in to of with of to the should be to In patients with a cancer that be with a in would the colon colon is to the colon for patients with colon cancer colon in would the colon, be is for a of and is to the in to of be to with a for and colon cancer of and to is and of the and of of a is for patients in of the colon was not have a for the colorectal and are not OF of the and with and of the and are for colon cancer of based on of the and with and is the of colon the of which a in the and the While the of in colorectal cancer is to and to that on use these In patients with to the use of a with of the and are on should be by with is not for colon cancer be in for patients with of based on have not demonstrated of in the of colorectal is not to for the of colon cancer the Cancer and the Society for do not in the of colorectal the be for patients with colon cancer who are for the of the of patients with colorectal that to a in management in of be in the of patients with on Colon cancer should be to the American Committee on and should of the of of based on The and have to be of in colon These are by the American Committee on Cancer and are in The the of to the for the of and the of and and in and in with a is a of cancer regarding the of of in these are not in the In to the of the the of the should be to be a of and is for The of is by the of be with the in with the for colorectal cancer OF THE is not in the should be of based on quality The of the colon cancer to on remains While a of and and Cancer that a in of to was with a in a and that of to are not to While a specific to be with the available cancer and should be patients have a by the of care the of a should be and the should be in the of based on The of the and the and to In the that are is that are to the and that the and of are and with use of the cancer In and in the of and should be of is and is the The should a of the and on the of of and The should of of and of of and of of and of the of have to the of and are by the American of Surgeons on The of of the colon should to the of the colon of based on The of a for colon cancer on the of the and In the of a colon for cancer should and of to to of at In the to the of should be to the of the to of the and is clinical of the of with a colon cancer, the and of the are at a colon cancer, the rectal and are at and the is the of the The should be with of the of the the of at the of with the should be is that at be to and the of is a for colon In the that are on the the should and and of the in to the guidelines by the of American of the colon and specific regarding the of and While a of patients with colon cancer that and in and a with patients patients and In a of to colon cancer, was for and for for colon cancer was with in the individual of based of the and and of the related to is of the to the have the and the and at a of to and a are a to these is not of based on the of at the of the in to of colon cancers and is with in the of in to of which be to to the and the This the and colon cancer and at the of the for cancer In the to the of the a colon cancer and not a of While to in and with and and a that is with of cancer and the a have with the in the are a on be is with and of the of is colon cancers that to and are with and with is of based on is by of the with a colon cancer and should not be they have to in to of The of a was in of patients with colon cancer in patients in of and and can and and of a and for is for of colon cancer, is not of based on In patients with colon cancer should be of a In patients with with a in of In these should be In patients with the do not at the of colorectal cancer should be in with colon cancer with for cancer and in In cancer with in the of cancer and a in In patients with colon cancer, can in and of of based on be to of colon The guidelines a to for patients with clinical colon In a of in in of patients and in to of in with and a of at years in patients with who with for The a the United with colon cancer to by and in in with and a of and a toward at years of the with The a patients with colon cancers to by by and in the to and a of in in the and of was clinical in of patients in the that have in the of the While and not a with a of the Cancer a patients with colon cancers with with the in patients with clinical cancers was in the the patients with cancers related to the use of is not a and a Cancer that for be with and In these is colon cancers be by of based on The colon cancer is to in which a colon cancer is diagnosed at the same to of the colon cancers have to in to of patients and have with cancers in the same of the colon are with a cancers in of the colon be with do not and have not with a the with the quality of colon cancer is with colorectal cancer the of should the These are the of Clinical Practice and are in Clinical Practice expertise is a to for colon cancer is of based on high-quality for colon cancer and and not be to a because of in most is expertise and should the same is not to is with in the United and have demonstrated with of and with with of colon colon cancers the that and for colon cancer, and and with a in and a of and In of and patients in of of of for cancer for the and and with with and in the of for colon cancer in cancer-related and for the While and for remains to for colon cancer these are to the of colon cancer is to that are for a patients with a be on and of of based on with a a cancer in be by colon and have all and to in patients with colon at is in patients be in of of of cancer of and and and of are the that is The of a is a of with the for a of patients with a who and cancer at the in and and of patients with of of the of Cancer of and in cancer at the in and of In a patients with to have cancer at the in and in patients with cancer at the in and This that a of not the of cancer with a of is for This be by the the In a and with in and of to the of and be to The be to for related to a in was to the of a and of patients with colorectal a is that of a with is that for patients with cancer in the at the of a of of patients diagnosed with in of patients with which the that was in these that and are of that should be a is and is and of patients with colorectal cancer who that and that cancer, and with in and of be with cancer, a and is for these the of in the colon is a a cancer, a of is the of in the colon is Approximately of patients with colon with The of in these are the of the the best and to of patients with colon cancer and the of with with should be based patient and expertise of the of based on and of and the of colon cancer, that in in use of a and and in years of a to with to cancers demonstrated a of and of and a of and and of and in the a these of these patients with be for patients in the of a are a is to the patient and While in to of a of to who develop a related to are at of cancer be to for patients with colon In of patients with colon cancer who the patients who with a to of the colon a in and the of the available and by the patient should all be to the for patient who with colon patients with colon cancer and with be of based on patients with cancers of the colon, with can be in most of a in on the at the of and the of that the for a While most a to have on that patients with can be and in to of In a of patients who the created and of and of for colon cancer demonstrated and the In the of of the colon, with a for a procedure is of based on have and colon In patients with a are to have a and have of and patients with cancers have and and of with have patients with In with of colon to of the is In the should be addressed by with to be to in patients with and clinical with by with should be The use of a is in the of colon a diagnosed colon cancer should be with of based on to is common in patients with colon cancer, and not the and to surgery. a colon cancer is a In of a of the patient by to the of are for and In of to with to in to of patients and can be with which in of in to of a of to in patients with a the of and methods to a colon cancer, is these is can be in with OF for patients with of colon cancer should be in a of based on The of and for colon cancer are to these with patients with and on colon cancer patients with rectal cancer The most in of of have The and is to for and of a at the and be by on with of at the the and to In patients with and are to and in in the of can be with and These based on and the to are for patients with with patients who have of colon The on patients and of patients a in of patients The for patients who to the was and patients who the best The to most of for of and a of and in the the and of patients with colon cancer to and to and a While a of with in with and OF Colon Cancer The of patients with colon cancer should be and based on a of based on for is to and that is to to with with the of is of the should be in patients with of the The of a to the use of and in patients with colorectal with colon cancer can be with by surgery. of based on The of in the of was addressed in in which patients with to to to of and and of of in the was a in the with the a of years not for who and who to the in in the the In the by are for patients with colon cancer with colon cancer should be for to to to of based on and of demonstrated that with of patients with colon cancer to and of these was in In the in patients with colorectal and with and and to of that use of a of and in of to a to in to and of of with of colon cancer should be in with the of based on In the of patients with colorectal of and in of patients These a of of a that of in with with of and and to in and In of these the patients who a of which with the in patients who not In the the of patients was and for patients was in these of patients in the and of the patients and in the to of in of the In patients with colon cancer and a is for and are for of based on with to the should of the the and the of should be for is that the procedure be in a with the expertise to the colon and the In a by and that and and the and and by that and colorectal and that the of a colorectal to a in in that the of a colorectal to a in in with and that was a of in of for and for In estimated for a with a to for a with in that and colorectal and in and of patients In a patients who and a of any and that not that be for at with In patients with colon cancer of the should be of based on of patients with colorectal cancer who demonstrated a of with the best in patients with cancers and who of patients who colorectal cancer in and and in and of patients who In a in which a of in and and with the best in patients who a with of patients a of a of for colon with rectal cancer in of patients at a of In the in Cancer which patients with colorectal cancer to was years and the that of these patients should be be in these to be in of and with In patients with colorectal cancer with should be in a with of based on In patients with have that is to the In these of the cancer with and of patients with colorectal who have a in the of to the with is and is The to colorectal cancer the of in with with in patients in and and with to the of by the Cancer have in the of to and in to of patients with In the of and in and and and and The of is related to In the of the that and about the of the of in the in The on the management of of colorectal cancer the at the and in for for with the use of Colon Cancer who with colon cancer are not for patients not be for to In these a management to is In patients with colon cancer who have colon the of is The of should be of by the cancer and of quality of for of the by colon cancer of a The individual should be In patients with colon cancer and colon cancer, is the treatment. of based on quality patients with colon cancer and colon are on the of in of be based on the which patients with colon cancer, colon and who with and In with of patients related to the colon and most for colon In a of patients with colorectal cancer colon and in of In the of and and and and and colon and age for a of the Cancer that for with of the with in the of the in which patients colorectal cancer and to a of the was in the and in the the the in of is and a a of and a that the that of the was with with and in in of of the be a of in the which and in patients who of the colon In the of patients colon cancer, all most with was not the colon was This same was in a of the that in the The most in of in a of patients who to and a of in the and in the with a in The was in the and in patients colon are is that the was to and that of the patients to with the available be made in of for these a be made for of of and in the The of clinical and are they provide to in these In patients with colon cancer and in is at is to is of based on In the of colon cancer is to to in and to of with in with patients patients with are to have and a in the a of of and and of and in a the and in the of the of patients who for colorectal cancer who with a for who with a to a of and to be to for the at at year was in the to in patients who are by a in a of colon in patients with have demonstrated in In colon cancer patients with cancer, in the a of based on colon cancer patients are a with that for a patient with a cancer to for a patient with a colon cancers that with have in the a are on is regarding the of in colon of the for colon cancer and patients and demonstrated a to a in of to with and to with in the the of patients with cancers was to in these the to of the a of to for a of these to in the of of the patients of in which was with in patients with colon cancer, that the of in in in deaths at years in of colon cancer patients in the Cancer the use of was with of In patients with colon cancer, with a of and years and and years with related to most that is to to in patients with colon patients with have a of which colon cancer and are for and of are that a in decisions in patients with colon cancer In patients with colon cancer, is of based on high-quality In patients with colon cancer, with and international clinical have demonstrated a with is a and to in in with to a of the the of in to the with In the of in for patients with colon cancer who of was in in patients with cancer, was with of of should be based on patient and of a not the use of The of to for for colon cancer is not have these the of a In patients with colon cancer, should be of based on high-quality In the in which patients with colorectal cancer to demonstrated in the In the cancer with to these of patients with colorectal cancer in in of patients of The a to the cancer on and that in a to in of patients and a of a to the is in the in which patients with colon cancer are to with and are for the of colorectal In should be of colon of based on Cancer of patients with colon cancer and demonstrated of was to of the that was was of colon The use of and be to for patients with colon of based on is that the of and a of of colon cancer on for patients with colon cancer who in the Cancer and demonstrated that the a the of to and that in the by was with In a of patients with and colon cancer in the and cancer and that cancer in the with the of patients and that was with and and to In in which a that to was in patient the and and cancer at years was in and of patients in the information was not of is a that the of of cancer In a of patients with colon cancer with the for and and is that and colon cancer patients at for In of by a of a with patients is a that to be in colon cancer patients who In colon cancer, patients with patients with The of was in patients with who with who not is of cancer that have the and be a for The of be for and to patients with colon cancer who be at of In of patients with colon cancer, and diagnosed with cancer at a of In of patients in was not be in to with have a a in in colon cancer with is in to be a for treatment. In a of of of was with In a of patients with of a of was not a of of These provide for the use of to the use of they and a of be a of and these on the colon cancer guidelines these the of cancer that is to use to The Society for guidelines are to in that the use of these is that use be in information on
•The National Academy of Medicine report, The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity calls for a series of policy reforms to unleash the potential of nurses to play greater roles in advancing health equity.•The report recommends that the systems that educate, pay and employ nurses: 1) permanently remove barriers to care; 2) value their contributions; 3) prepare nurses to tackle health equity; and 4) diversify the workforce. The need to fully support nurses is interwoven throughout the report.•All nurses should work in partnership with others to advance the nine major report recommendations. The National Academy of Medicine's long-anticipated report, The Future of Nursing 2020–2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity, offers an aspirational vision: the achievement of health equity in the United States built on strengthened nursing capacity, diversity, and expertise (Wakefield, 2021Wakefield M. Federally qualified health centers and related primary care workforce issues.Jama. 2021; 325: 1145-1146Crossref PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar). Released in May 2021, the report arrives at a critical moment for the profession. Many nurses are burned out, exhausted, and have experienced moral injury from caring for an unrelenting stream of patients with COVID-19. The pandemic has laid bare and further exacerbated long-existing health inequities. School closings during the pandemic similarly exacerbated educational disparities, and poor treatment of Black, Indigenous, and other people of color by police spotlighted inequities in law enforcement. Collectively, these inequities have resulted in renewed calls to dismantle structural, cultural, and interpersonal racism, including within nursing. This new report provides a roadmap for how the nursing profession can contribute its expertise to create a fairer, more just and healthier world. The report is the second collaboration between the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) on the future of nursing. The first report, released in 2010, re-conceptualized the role of nurses in transforming the healthcare system (Shalala et al., 2011Shalala D. Bolton L.B. Bleich M.R. Brennan T. Campbell R. Devlin L. The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. 10. The National Academy Press, Washington DC2011: 12956https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12956/the-future-of-nursing-leading-change-advancing-healthGoogle Scholar). RWJF and AARP formed The Future of Nursing: Campaign for Action, a nationwide initiative to advance the report recommendations. Over the past decade, the nursing field strengthened nursing education, advanced practice, promoted leadership, and increased workforce diversity. In doing so, the nursing field has built – and is continuing to build – its capacity to provide high-quality care to more Americans. As nursing built its capacity and as the evidence increasingly linked inequities to poorer health status, it became clear that nurses could do more to build healthier communities and advance equity. Nurses are the most trusted profession and the first point of contact for most people seeking health care. They are bridge builders and collaborators who engage and connect with people, communities, and organizations to promote health and well-being (Pittman, 2019Pittman, P. (2019,. March 12). Activating nursing to address the unmet needs of the 21st century: Background paper for the NAM Committee on Nursing 2030.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Available at: https://publichealth.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/downloads/HPM/Activating%20Nursing %20To%20Address%20Unmet%20Needs%20In%20The %2021st%20Century.pdfGoogle Scholar). Their expertise could be better used to combat the many shortcomings of the U.S. health system. The United States spends $3.5 trillion each year on health care (CMS, 2020) more than any other country in the world but ranks last compared with other high-income countries on equity, access to care, health care outcomes, and administrative efficiency (Schneider et al., 2021Schneider, E. et al.,(2021, August)) Mirror, Mirror 2021 — Reflecting Poorly: Health Care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries (Commonwealth Fund). https://doi.org/10.26099/01dv-h208.Google Scholar). Life expectancy, infant mortality and maternal mortality are worse in the United States compared with other high-income nations. Disparities in health care access and outcomes related to race, income, geography and other social and environmental factors are also common. RWJF has long believed that nurses have enormous potential for tackling the shortcomings of health and health care in the United States and in 2019 asked the NAM to form a committee tasked with charting a path for the nursing profession to create a culture of health, reduce health disparities, and improve the health and well-being of the nation. As the committee was well into the process of reviewing evidence and preparing to write the report, the pandemic took hold across the country and shined a light on the nation's rampant health inequities. The committee delayed the report to incorporate the major lessons from the pandemic: its disproportionate and devastating toll on poor and marginalized populations that could largely be attributed to persistent health disparities; the need to fully support nurses; and better prepare the workforce for future disasters. Released in May 2021, the report called for a series of policy reforms to unleash the potential of nurses to play greater roles in advancing health equity. The report recommends that the systems that educate, pay, and employ nurses: (1) permanently remove barriers to care; (2) value their contributions; (3) prepare nurses to tackle health equity; and (4) diversify the workforce. The report underscores that prioritizing nurse well-being is paramount to advancing the recommendations. In addition, the report calls on national nursing organizations to develop a shared agenda for addressing the social determinants of health and achieving health equity. Finally, the committee prioritized research needs to build the evidence base to support nurses in advancing health equity. Each of these areas is discussed below. Far too often in the United States, people do not see a health care provider when they need one. Nearly 30 million people are uninsured in the United States, and roughly 40 million have health plans that leave them potentially underinsured (Collins et al., August 2020Collins, Sara R., Gunja, Munira Z., & Aboulafia, Gabriella N. (2020). U.S. Health insurance coverage in 2020: A looming crisis in affordability — findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2020.Commonwealth Fund. https://doi.org/10.26099/6aj3-n655.Google Scholar). In addition, timely access to health care is undermined due to the inability to pay; geographic inaccessibility to services and providers, particularly in rural and underserved urban areas; lack of health literacy; and fundamental mistrust of the health care system and providers. Research demonstrates that delays in obtaining care can lead people to experience worse symptoms and disease progression (Man et al., 2018Man R.X.G. Lack D.A. Wyatt C.E. Murray V. The effect of natural disasters on cancer care: A systematic review.The Lancet Oncology. 2018; 19: e482-e499https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30412-1Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar). Nurses can help to explicitly address these gaps in access to care. For example, about 70% to 80% of advanced-practice nurses work in primary care, including in pediatrics, adult practice, gerontology, and nurse midwifery. While the primary care nurse practitioner field has grown, the number of physicians entering primary care has stagnated or declined (Barnes et al., 2018Barnes H. Richards M.R. McHugh M.D. Martsolf G. Rural and nonrural primary care physician practices increasingly rely on nurse practitioners.Health Affairs. 2018; 37: 908-914https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1158Crossref PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar; Barnes et al., 2018Xue Y. Ye Y. Brewer C. Spetz J. Impact of state nurse practitioner scope-of-practice regulation on health care delivery: Systematic review.Nursing outlook. 2016; 64: 71-85https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1158Crossref PubMed Scopus (117) Google Scholar). Care provided by nurse practitioners has been found to be comparable to the care provided by physicians, according to numerous studies (Perloff et al., 2019Perloff J. Clarke S. DesRoches C.M. O'Reilly-Jacob M. Buerhaus P. Association of state-level restrictions in nurse practitioner scope of practice with the quality of primary care provided to Medicare beneficiaries.Medical Care Research and Review. 2019; 76: 597-626Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar; Yang et al., 2020Yang B.K. Johantgen M.E. Trinkoff A.M. Idzik S.R. Wince J. Tomlinson C. State Nurse Practitioner practice regulations and US health care delivery outcomes: A systematic review.Medical Care Research and Review. 2021; 78: 183-196https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558719901216Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar). They are less expensive to employ than physicians and are more likely to care for vulnerable populations, including those in rural areas (Perloff et al., 2016Perloff J. DesRoches C.M. Buerhaus P. Comparing the cost of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries assigned to primary care nurse practitioners and physicians.Health Services Research. 2016; 51: 1407-1423Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). However, the ability of nurses to expand access to care is limited by state and federal laws, institutional barriers, and restrictive health systems policies that prohibit them from working to the full extent of their education and training (Wakefield et al., 2021Wakefield M.K. Williams D.R. Le Menestrel S. Flaubert J.L. The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to health equity. National Press, Google Scholar). The report calls for and organizations to remove these and as well as restrictive policies and In during the and provided full practice to nurse is just about the effect of the to expand scope of practice during the pandemic et al., R. Impact of pandemic on from a national 2021; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar; et al., 19: for nurse practitioners to healthcare and for full practice 2021; PubMed Scopus (24) Google in the found that with to from The of nurse practitioner to reduce from the and Scholar). The report calls for these restrictions on scope of practice to be This to remove practice barriers the work of the first report, but it in more the need to barriers that and nurses from to the of their education and training to access to care and help to reduce health care inequities for populations to see a provider when they need one. that the care that and nurses provide restrictions on services and policies that nurses from care. nurses to practice to the full extent of their education and training is an policy to gaps in access to care. As the report the and systems do to reduce health inequities. This has been by the has its to health equity a in policy & E. M. D. et at the for Medicare and a for the 2021; Google Scholar). health care that health equity can a in The U.S. systems the care that nurses provide and the critical role that they can play in addressing to health equity. For example, care nurses can patients at to help and address social needs nurses can work to advance or state policies that address the need for and systems often for services including the services of nurses and other care nurses can expand to advance health equity their roles in care and care; care; including nurses; and School for example, are a for million particularly from but they are for the services they They help and contact of including COVID-19. They also provide health care. of health to nurses the pandemic related to health et al., S. M. T. D. G. J. School Health Services in the United States, and Health Services Google a need that has during the of color more barriers to health treatment than and can these et al., D. A.M. health of of 2018; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of do not employ a and employ et al., nursing practice in the United of School 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). School nurses are to for services that they but the process is that do M. Available Scholar). that and diversify the nursing workforce help to advance health equity. to the nursing the report calls for and to provide for nursing that address social needs and the social determinants of health in nursing practice and systems can nurses to to care and outcomes for patients by and that can reduce health inequities. the of nursing to improve care limited the organizations that employ nurses are not for these care and for nursing to advance health The future of nursing NAM 2021; Scholar). The report recommends that and systems be to support and health care and health organizations to nurses to these the United States spends of for health care with health outcomes that in to countries that and are to policy that better health Nursing in these is as is policy that the nurses can to advancing health equity. The of nurses needs to be well to promote health equity and improve the health and well-being of nurses need to and the social and environmental factors that health, care for an and more engage in new new with other and health equity and to a policy and collaboration with across the health care and health systems as well as of health care with organizations on social and be paramount during the the nursing field an in preparing the as an million nurses during the by This in an May as nursing education to nurses well to on and roles and to advance the NAM report recommendations. to prepare nurses to tackle health equity related to the social determinants of health, health and health are not into and nursing that nurses are to address the social determinants of health and advance health and healthcare equity. and should be throughout including need to the extent to they provide education in that provide with and from who with an of social needs as well as with communities with the social determinants of health (Wakefield et al., 2021Wakefield M.K. Williams D.R. Le Menestrel S. Flaubert J.L. The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to health equity. National Press, Google Scholar). across the including in policy by on as are of can provided health as health care, qualified health health and for educational should incorporate to and work with other health and to address the social determinants of health. need in that prepare them to on a in health equity, care for populations with and and them to build the and to advance health equity. Nurse can from of nursing that and the social determinants of health, health and For example, at the of Washington a year in work in the by a year in in its with a that practice and to by and nurses be to the of nurses and build the evidence base and that connect the social determinants of health, health equity, and health as well as nursing nursing need to be to and research that of social and equity in education and including a on institutional and the number of nurses with including and of including for and that on equity. should have in the of on the social determinants of health as for and care and for health In to and new to advance health and healthcare equity, a more nursing workforce be The new report calls on the nursing field to address and within nursing education and practice, and to and – by a to about diversity, and of the role of and in health care J. from to in A of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Nursing needs to and address within the profession to address barriers that contribute to the nursing profession and calls to diversity, the nursing field is roughly 80% of the U.S. The further for nurses in including in and Association of of Nursing and of Nurse Association of of Nursing and of Nurse as report to The Future of Nursing: Campaign for that of nursing and of people of the of Nurse that just of nursing people of color and Nurses of color report and within their work et al., M.D. Johnson can be too and at the Health Research. 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar; et al., C. M. practice of nurses: of Nursing Research. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). are to achieving a workforce. support should be the of and to nursing workforce across practice and in nursing and practice should and and to that nursing and the of the and that barriers of are from nursing education, including in the institutional and and the and of and The in nursing and nursing in the United of 2021; 37: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). practice nurses need to be to and connect with people of and be of how their and their these is on a and strengthened and practice that is and or people from and of nursing should support and address barriers to their throughout their and into and training with about be critical for nurses in practice should and promote nurses from The report that for nursing and and that lead to increased workforce diversity, equity and the are to (1) and and that and and (2) progression for and that and in underserved areas; and (3) with expertise in health equity and and other to develop the health equity of and other health people of those with those and those with limited access to health care and et al., S. S. The of disasters on populations with health and health care Medicine and Health PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). nurses on the of and help people and communities to and nursing not and about health care The report recommends that nursing and expand educational and training for nurses in and at with to vulnerable unleash the potential of nurses to advance health equity, country needs to nurse The nursing profession has been for its and caring in care during the However, often by and to and their with a to the studies the nursing by an of factors from working in to and in the to the of caring for or of work Wood Johnson Wood Johnson Foundation. Scholar; and Nurse Impact on of Nursing Research. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of and increased during the in moral injury and for many nurses The of Nurse 2021; Scholar; et al., moral of the pandemic: moral 2021; PubMed Google and and from the nursing the more than nurses in a by the Nurses of the most shared they are a of and from when they in the of the of nurses they have as of nurses last that they Nurses Foundation Nurses on the Nurses Health and (2020). Available at: Scholar). Nursing and have also in related to their the to new and to education in of Many to of training and practice for in their or a to Nursing exhausted, and the pandemic et al., C. M. and nursing PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). have a role to play in well-being and them with and to their well-being throughout their should build and that well-being throughout the in and The Care at the of School of for example, well-being and D. The of Care in Health and Scholar). the of the was the and throughout the of the capacity and in and not 2021, The U.S. the of from including more than nurses who have from the a disproportionate number of are nurses of color and Health and Health on the Available at: Scholar). The of in the year that could and but as to The and nurses in and in 2021 has by that too many health practices that could disease with on and and the well-being of The nursing often in the they has been further and is in at 2021; on August Scholar; The Nursing in of 2021; Scopus (1) Google Scholar). to nurses nurses who experience poor and health are more likely to with to patients and L. C. J. A national and health to and of and 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the clear from an and policy in the is to tackle the and policies that create and that lead to and poor and health the nursing workforce. While the of pandemic on and of nurses is the and of nurses from health to critical care are too and The report to create and to fully support The primary on education nursing and nursing organizations to and that promote health and as they on new roles to advance health equity. This leadership, and to and explicitly work to improve nurse to support these and work that nurses are with a and and other support Health care organizations can explicitly on or to nurses from They can that nurses and others to report any including and can engage their nursing for and about the of and work that they most in their well-being and that of their nurse practice is support that nurses to with other nurses who are or have experienced is to between and nursing and value and support for nurses also obtaining on process that can on For example, the to the health of people with and social offers each to create their and to support with C. Scholar). While has an role in nurse it is an to that nurses often from to lack of or work of health and healthcare organizations needs to to their and and advance health equity across the the report calls on a of to support the nursing within nursing is capacity could more and advance health equity an that has the potential to improve health and well-being for of Americans. the capacity is in the first that calls on nursing organizations to work than to address social needs and the social determinants of health and and on expertise by nursing This shared is also work of their educational or work Nursing organizations should to for education, practice and policy that address the social determinants of health and advance health equity. The agenda should across nursing practice, education, leadership, and health policy with and for by many nursing organizations have educational with and in many other to advance health equity. While these are the report calls on nursing organizations to expertise and and more prioritizing these areas on of the populations While is a evidence base to build more research is to advance health equity, including a on that practice education and For example, a evidence base is to and and diversify the nursing nurse and to fully address health and advance health equity. The report calls on the major health and to from health, and health care to develop and support a research agenda and evidence base that the of nursing including on the social determinants of health, environmental health, health equity, and health and Research should on educational that in in the number and of and from and as well as education that are in preparing nurses to and and improve the of advanced to care more In its on the nursing profession to its and achieving health equity, the field is prioritizing a that has been for too long with The pandemic that disease on of social determinants of health can on of The past have been devastating for people who in rural and people of who have and and from COVID-19. Nurses by the of have into that their health and that of their at and are moral and from asked to their care of a of and the the nursing profession should be with these working to advance these the nursing field to the for a healthier and more just for – the most and of This work is not and be by the nursing profession of As the report nursing need the support and collaboration of health. need to be and with need to be with social and other that have long to advance health equity, including social social services and that work on of populations the of health inequities. Health and need to be as well The future of nursing The of 2021; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). in its the report nine major and Nurses and other can the report at and work with others in to The also policy and a series about the In addition, the Future of Nursing: Campaign for has an on its with plans for each that any can as a point to advance health equity. Nursing has a in health across a of Over the decade, the report calls on nurses to more and to these health in the first by working and to the factors that health disparities, poor health outcomes and in the of achieving health equity. The report a path for nurses to to advancing health equity. the health of and communities at the is – and – – and
Journal of Palliative MedicineVol. 3, No. 1 Innovations in End-of-Life CareTaking a Spiritual History Allows Clinicians to Understand Patients More FullyDr. Christina Puchalski and Anna L. RomerDr. Christina Puchalski and Anna L. RomerPublished Online:19 Apr 2005https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2000.3.129AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byVerbalizing spiritual needs in palliative care: a qualitative interview study on verbal and non-verbal communication in two Danish hospices4 January 2022 | BMC Palliative Care, Vol. 21, No. 1Implementation of an Educational Toolkit to Increase Nurse Competence in Spirituality and Spiritual Care of Oncology Patients8 November 2022 | Journal of Holistic Nursing, Vol. 5Posicionamento sobre a Saúde Cardiovascular nas Mulheres – 2022Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, Vol. 119, No. 5Experiences of German health care professionals with spiritual history taking in primary care: a mixed-methods process evaluation of the HoPES3 intervention15 October 2022 | Family Practice, Vol. 29Religious and spiritual journeys of LGBT older adults in rural Southern Appalachia25 October 2021 | Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, Vol. 34, No. 4The CASH assessment tool: A window into existential suffering19 May 2021 | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 28, No. 4Integrating religion/spirituality into professional social work practice27 July 2022 | Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, Vol. 41, No. 4The Concept of Spirituality in the Health Sector: Contributions from the Study of Religion27 September 2022 | International Journal of Latin American Religions, Vol. 12Systematic review: The relationship between religion, spirituality and mental health in adolescents who identify as transgender13 September 2022 | Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, Vol. 26„Des Lebens Ruf an uns wird niemals enden“ – Sinnzentrierte Interventionen im Überblick30 August 2022 | Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin, Vol. 23, No. 05Case discussion: The critically ill older adult in spiritual distressGeriatric Nursing, Vol. 47Australian Patient Preferences for the Introduction of Spirituality into their Healthcare Journey: A Mixed Methods Study3 August 2022 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 27Religion, Spirituality, and Ethics in Psychiatric Practice30 March 2022 | Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, Vol. 210, No. 8Spiritual distress in dialysis: A case report21 July 2022 | Progress in Palliative Care, Vol. 211Interprofessional communication training to address spiritual aspects of cancer care19 July 2022 | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 29Spirituality in Serious Illness and HealthJAMA, Vol. 328, No. 2What is the role of spiritual care specialists in teaching generalist spiritual care? The perspectives of pastoral care staff in a large Catholic health and aged care organisation.5 July 2022 | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 63Teaching spirituality to medical students: a systematic review17 June 2021 | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 28, No. 3Biblical narratives and the planned change process in social work: assessment tool integration of faith and learning5 May 2022 | Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, Vol. 41, No. 3God, spirituality and religion in women dying from gynecological cancer19 July 2021 | Climacteric, Vol. 25, No. 3Palliative Professionals’ Views on the Importance of Religion, Belief, and Spiritual Identities toward the End of Life16 May 2022 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 10“Spirituality is everybody’s business”: an exploration of the impact of spiritual care training upon the perceptions and practice of rehabilitation professionals25 September 2020 | Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 44, No. 8A quality improvement project to standardize chaplain documentation in the electronic medical record28 December 2020 | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 28, No. 2Corrigendum: Spirituality/Religiosity as a Therapeutic Resource in Clinical Practice: Conception of Undergraduate Medical Students of the Paulista School of Medicine (Escola Paulista de Medicina) - Federal University of São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo)29 March 2022 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13AD-LAST! An interdisciplinary clinical workshop to improve cultural and spiritual awareness in advance care planning skills15 March 2022 | Palliative and Supportive Care, Vol. 55Hope pictured in drawings by patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer11 March 2022 | Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 298Addressing spiritual distress in pediatric oncology14 January 2022 | Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Vol. 69, No. 3Exploring the Meaning of Spirituality and Spiritual Care with Help From Viktor Frankl24 June 2021 | Journal of Holistic Nursing, Vol. 40, No. 1Standardized Spiritual Screening Increases Chaplain Referrals Through the EMR: A Nurse-Chaplain Collaboration for Holistic Acute Healthcare23 February 2022 | Journal of Holistic Nursing, Vol. 63Interplay between spirituality and religiosity on the physical and mental well-being of cancer survivors15 September 2021 | Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 30, No. 2Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Spirituality in Serious Illness Allison Kestenbaum, George Fitchett, Paul Galchutt, Dirk Labuschagne, Shelley E. Varner-Perez, Alexia M. Torke, and Arif H. Kamal3 February 2022 | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 2Moving Beyond Spiritual Assessments: A Dynamic, Augustinian Approach to Spiritual Care of the Dying24 January 2022 | Journal of Pastoral Theology, Vol. 29Integrating Spiritual Care in the Frame1 January 2022Evaluation of a Spiritual History with Elderly Multi-Morbid Patients in General Practice—A Mixed-Methods Study within the Project HoPES34 January 2022 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 1Invited Commentary: Religious Service Attendance and Implications for Clinical Care, Community Participation, and Public Health11 May 2021 | American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 191, No. 1Use of the Classic Hallucinogen Psilocybin for Treatment of Existential Distress Associated with Cancer1 January 2022Religiousness and Spirituality in Coping with Cancer1 January 2022Spirituality/Religiosity as a Therapeutic Resource in Clinical Practice: Conception of Undergraduate Medical Students of the Paulista School of Medicine (Escola Paulista de Medicina) - Federal University of São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo)24 December 2021 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12Patient desire for spiritual assessment is unmet in urban and rural primary care settings31 March 2021 | BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 21, No. 1Australian perspectives on spiritual care training in healthcare: A Delphi study13 July 2021 | Palliative and Supportive Care, Vol. 19, No. 6Defining Spirituality in Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework18 November 2021 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12Assessing the Impact of Provider Training and Perceived Barriers on the Provision of Spiritual Care: a Mixed Methods Study12 November 2021 | Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 5Development of an Instrument to Assess Spirituality: Reliability and Validation of the Attitudes Related to Spirituality Scale (ARES)4 November 2021 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12Association between Spirituality, Religiosity, Spiritual Pain, Symptom Distress, and Quality of Life among Latin American Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Study Marvin O. Delgado-Guay, Alejandra Palma, Eva Duarte, Mónica Grez, Laura Tupper, Diane D. Liu, and Eduardo Bruera27 October 2021 | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 11Spirituality and Vicarious Trauma Among Trauma Clinicians: A Qualitative Study19 October 2021 | Journal of Trauma Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 6Abordando o Sofrimento Existencial na Pessoa com Cancro20 February 2022 | Revista Portuguesa de Psiquiatria e Saúde MentalQuestioning Capacity in an Elderly Jamaican Man with Terminal Cancer Exhibiting Near-Death Awareness: A Case Report and Review of Literature Cynthia X. Pan, Kelly Thomson, Bruno A. Costa, and Jane Morris13 August 2021 | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 9Posicionamento sobre Hipertensão Arterial e Espiritualidade – 20211 September 2021 | Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, Vol. 117, No. 3The Content, Teaching Methods and Effectiveness of Spiritual Care Training for Healthcare Professionals: A Mixed-Methods Systematic ReviewJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 62, No. 3Religiosity and spirituality in psychiatry residency programs: why, what, and how to teach?1 August 2021 | Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 43, No. 4Editorial: children’s life, religiosity and spirituality matter: perspectives of special groups and their related adults16 July 2021 | International Journal of Children's Spirituality, Vol. 26, No. 3Development and protocol for a nurse-led telephonic palliative care programNursing Outlook, Vol. 69, No. 4Psychological Distress Among a Tunisian Community Sample During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Correlations with Religious Coping27 March 2021 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 60, No. 3Optimism and social support as contributing factors to spirituality in Cancer patients3 January 2021 | Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 29, No. 6A mixed‐methods approach to comparing perceptions of cancer patients' and cancer care providers' religious and spiritual beliefs, behaviours, and attitudes23 December 2020 | European Journal of Cancer Care, Vol. 30, No. 3Spirituality and religion in residents and inter-relationships with clinical practice and residency training: a scoping review28 May 2021 | BMJ Open, Vol. 11, No. 5Using Simulation to Prepare Students for Medical Mission TripsJournal of Christian Nursing, Vol. 38, No. 2Implementation of a Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy training (MCPT) program for oncology clinicians: a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers9 October 2019 | Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 1Medical student reflections: Chaplain shadowing as a model for compassionate care training27 September 2020 | Medical Teacher, Vol. 43, No. 1Competence 3: Spiritual Care, Assessment and Planning19 May 2021Psychospirituelle Ressourcen in einer VUCA-Welt: Implikationen für Beratung und Coaching26 May 2021Application and Implementation of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire in Spiritual Care Processes29 May 2021Spiritual Care in Health Care: Guideline, Models, Spiritual Assessment and the Use of the ©FICA Spiritual History Tool29 May 2021Relevance of Addressing Spiritual Needs for Clinical Support in Palliative Medicine29 May 2021Addressing Spiritual Needs in Faith Community Nursing29 May 2021Sentidos de vida e morte: reflexões de pacientes em cuidados paliativos1 January 2021 | Psicologia USP, Vol. 32Spiritual Care Competencies for Advanced Practice Nurses16 October 2021Introduction to Spirituality16 October 2021Global APN Case Study in Spirituality-Stories of Hope from Australia16 October 2021Four aspects of spiritual care: a phenomenological action research study on practicing and improving spiritual care at two Danish hospices22 October 2021 | Palliative Care and Social Practice, Vol. 15A Holistic Approach to Meeting Physical, Social and Psychological Needs23 December 2020Effectiveness of spiritual care training for rehabilitation professionals: An exploratory controlled trialNeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 47, No. 4Spiritual Well-Being in People Living with Persistent Non-Cancer and Cancer-Related Pain9 December 2020 | Pain Medicine, Vol. 196Testing of a (Spiritual) Self-Assessment Tool ((S)SAT) in a Community Hospital Setting23 November 2020 | Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications, Vol. 74, No. 4Genetic counseling graduate training to address religion and spirituality in clinical practice: A qualitative exploration of programs in North America30 May 2020 | Journal of Genetic Counseling, Vol. 29, No. 6The relationship between caregivers’ perceptions of end-of-life care in long-term care and a good resident death15 May 2020 | Palliative and Supportive Care, Vol. 18, No. 6“Give them the door but don’t push them through it”: Family Attitudes Toward Physician-Led Spiritual Care in Pediatric Palliative Medicine12 February 2020 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 59, No. 6Exploring spirituality with older people: (1) rich experiences11 August 2019 | Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, Vol. 32, No. 4Cultural Competency9 September 2020The Urgency of Spiritual Care: COVID-19 and the Critical Need for Whole-Person PalliationJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 60, No. 3Spirituality in Recovery From Substance Use DisordersJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol. 58, No. 9A Narrative Approach to Spirituality and Spiritual Care in Health Care3 October 2019 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 59, No. 3Neural underpinning of a personal relationship with God and sense of control: A lesion-mapping study25 April 2020 | Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 20, No. 3Patterns of Religiosity, Death Anxiety, and Hope in a Population of Community-Dwelling Palliative Care Patients in New Zealand—What Gives Hope If Religion Can’t?9 December 2019 | American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Vol. 37, No. 5Pain Management in Patients with Serious IllnessMedical Clinics of North America, Vol. 104, No. 3Varieties of Religious (Non)AffiliationJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, Vol. 208, No. 5Cuidados paliativos31 August 2020 | PAJAR - Pan American Journal of Aging Research, Vol. 8, No. 1The Invisibility of Spiritual Nursing Care in Clinical Practice28 November 2019 | Journal of Holistic Nursing, Vol. 38, No. 1Spirituality in heart failure: a review of the literature from 2014 to 2019 to identify spiritual care needs and spiritual interventionsCurrent Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care, Vol. 14, No. 1Plädoyer für einen (berufs-) alltagstauglichen Begriff von Spiritualität9 July 2021 | Spiritual Care, Vol. 0, No. 0Spirituality and mental health17 February 2020 | Journal for the Study of Spirituality, Vol. 10, No. 1Positive Interventions in Substance Use Disorders25 January 2020Spirituality/religion and painA Mother’s Love – Support Despite Disagreeing with Goals of Care10 June 2020Charting Spiritual Care: Psychiatric and Psychotherapeutic Aspects11 August 2020Spirituality5 September 2020CE: Assessing and Managing Spiritual Distress in Cancer SurvivorshipAJN, American Journal of Nursing, Vol. 120, No. 1Health Care Professionals' Reflections on Their Learning as Spiritual Generalists and Integration Into Practice28 October 2020 | Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Vol. 40, No. 4End-of-Life, Grief, and Bereavement: Strategies to Provide Comfort?3 October 2020Our transformational leader might be replaced, we are extremely stressed out!Management Research Review, Vol. 43, No. 5Navigating the Murky Waters of Hope, Fear, and Spiritual SufferingSurgical Clinics of North America, Vol. 99, No. 5Spirituality and Religion-Relevance and Assessment in the Clinical SettingCurrent Psychiatry Research and Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 2Religion, Belief, and Spirituality in Health Care2 August 2019Faith-Health Collaboration to Improve Community and Population Health12 August 2019 | NAM PerspectivesBrazilian Physicians’ Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Patients’ Spirituality: Implications for Clinical Practice29 September 2018 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 58, No. 4Recent Advances in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy For Digestive Disorders and the Role of Applied Positive Psychology Across the Spectrum of GI CareJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, Vol. 53, No. 7Preferences, use of and satisfaction with mental health services among a sample of Puerto Rican cancer patients18 July 2019 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 7Spirituality as agency and restoration in existential recovery11 April 2018 | Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, Vol. 21, No. 3Meaning-Centered Interventions for Patients With Advanced or Terminal Cancer18 July 2018 | Cancer Nursing, Vol. 42, No. 4Spiritual and Religious Coping of Medical Decision Makers for Hospitalized Older Adult Patients Saneta M. Maiko, Steven Ivy, Beth Newton Watson, Kianna Montz, and Alexia M. Torke27 March 2019 | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 4Time to follow the evidence – Spiritual care in health careEthics, Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 9How and When Is Role Modeling Effective? The Influence of Mentee Professional Identity on Mentoring Dynamics and Personal Learning Outcomes18 April 2019 | Group & Organization Management, Vol. 44, No. 2Teenagers and Cannabis Use: Why It's a Problem and What Can Be Done About ItJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol. 57, No. 3Haken und Ösen: Spiritualität in der klinischen PalliativversorgungWege zum Menschen, Vol. 71, No. 2Approaching Spirituality Using the Patient-Centered Clinical Method27 January 2018 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 58, No. 1Medical Students’ (Dis)comfort with Assessing Religious and Spiritual Needs in a Standardized Patient Encounter10 October 2018 | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 58, No. 1Spirituality and Religiosity of Pharmacy Students1 February 2019 | American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 83, No. 1Interprofessional spiritual care in oncology: a literature review16 February 2019 | ESMO Open, Vol. 4, No. 1Physical, Psychological/Psychiatric, Social, and Spiritual Problems and Symptoms13 April 2019Spiritual Assessment in Healthcare: An Overview of Comprehensive, Sensitive Approaches to Spiritual Assessment for Use Within the Interdisciplinary Healthcare Team18 May 2019The Role of the Nurse in Providing Spiritual Care: A Case Study Approach to Exploring Specific Care Provision by Healthcare Workers in the Context of an Interdisciplinary Healthcare Team18 May 2019Teaching and Learning About Spirituality in Healthcare Practice Settings18 May 2019Religion and Spirituality Among Medical Students5 June 2019Spiritual Care: The Role of Health Care Chaplaincy4 September 2019End-of-life milieu of critically sick children admitted to a pediatric hospital: A comparative study of survivors versus nonsurvivorsIndian Journal of Palliative Care, Vol. 25, No. 4Incorporating and Teaching Spirituality into Medical Education: An Overview of the Field and Possible Educational Strategies4 September 2019Religion, Spirituality, and Stress6 March 2019Toward Comprehensive Medicine: Listening to Spiritual and Religious Needs of Patients26 April 2019 | Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Vol. 5Din ve Psikoloji Arasındaki Uçurum Gerçekten Ne Kadar Derin? Psikoterapilerdeki Dini İzler15 December 2018 | Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi, Vol. 22, No. 3Women's Perceptions of Using Short Films to Integrate Spirituality in TherapyJournal of Systemic Therapies, Vol. 37, No. 4Content Validation of Advanced Illness Criteria of a Palliative Care Screening Tool Lauren C. DiLello, Karen Mulvihill, Jennifer Delli Carpini, Riddhi Shah, Julia Hermanowski, and Damanjeet Chaubey29 October 2018 | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 11Understanding, assessing, and in the spiritual of medical and October 2018 | Theology, Vol. 11, No. and of in Living with October 2018 | Journal of & Social Services, Vol. No. for the spirituality as October 2018 | Revista de Vol. 71, No. An of an aged psychiatry March 2018 | Psychiatry, Vol. 26, No. de de vida de de Vol. 25, No. support and with in Care in the Care A Narrative June | Journal of Care Medicine, Vol. No. Care in Cancer: in the of of Clinical Oncology Educational Vol. 3, No. religion/spirituality in clinical practice: A among social and and October | Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 74, No. Spirituality in Care December | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 57, No. of to spiritual care at the of a phenomenological exploration from the of palliative care February 2018 | Journal for the Study of Spirituality, Vol. 8, No. Existential Distress in Pediatric Cancer December and Patient Spiritual in the through October of Spirituality in November Psychological/Psychiatric, Social, and Spiritual Problems and July and End-of-Life Care in Cancer in Oncology Nursing, Vol. No. Care in Hospice and Palliative Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, Vol. 20, No. and Spirituality: Literature review and Journal of Counseling, Vol. 18, No. of the tool existential communication between and cancer August | European Journal of General Practice, Vol. 23, No. Education and of Christian Nursing, Vol. 34, No. Care Interventions in to and Therapy C. and D. September | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. in Patients with A Qualitative September | Journal of Research in Nursing and Vol. 14, No. theory on the and in an exploratory case study September | Vol. 69, No. of the of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research and of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. No. of a spiritual care training program for staff on November | Palliative and Supportive Care, Vol. 15, No. 4Spiritual distress and spiritual care in advanced heart July | Reviews, Vol. and Spiritual Patient Simulation in Nursing, Vol. No. Vol. 42, No. 4The impact of a spiritual in patients with and and their support December | Vol. 26, No. 3The Importance of a Spiritual History in Healthcare Vol. No. About Substance Use DisordersJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol. No. and Spiritual Beliefs of April | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. No. Care Perceptions of and With of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, Vol. 19, No. in Substance Use What to Know to Practice30 November | in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 38, No. End-of-Life Care to Religious and Vol. No. of Social Education, Vol. 53, No. Nursing Care and of Christian Nursing, Vol. 34, No. 1The of taking a religious and spiritual July | Psychiatry, Vol. 24, No. religion and spirituality in Vol. No. the role of religious in the at the of of Vol. No. care spiritual March | Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 24, No. Spiritual Care and the Role of An Review of Literature and April | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. No. of the Spiritual Needs of of with Is in the June | Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 19, No. Impact of a Tool for Comprehensive Assessment of Palliative Care on Assessment at and of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. No. from Healthcare Students to Understand Spiritual Assessment in Clinical Practice29 October | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. No. Spirituality in January | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. No. 3Development and of to Assess Nurse Provision of Spiritual August 2014 | Journal of Holistic Nursing, Vol. 34, No. and Validation of the Practice Assessment September 2014 | Research on Social Practice, Vol. 26, No. and the Medical A of July | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 22, No. history taking in palliative care: A controlled September | Palliative Medicine, Vol. 30, No. Is Is Using A and the Life With American in Spiritual March | Journal of in Mental Health, Vol. 11, No. and spiritual in September | International Journal of and Mental Health, Vol. No. 1The of Hospital to and Patients’ Spiritual A May | Journal for the Study of Spirituality, Vol. No. 1The and to March End-of-Life Spiritual March in Holistic Patient Journal of Nursing, Vol. No. of spiritual assessment for older September 2014 | and Vol. No. und der der Care, Vol. No. Spirituality and A for Holistic January | Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. No. and Belief, in Care spiritual history tool by C. M. Puchalski as an for an interdisciplinary in January | Journal for of and Social Vol. 21, No. the of Spiritual A Pain and Palliative Care Service Quality of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. No. of Spiritual Assessment in September | Vol. No. the of Christian Nursing, Vol. 32, No. 4Spiritual care: is the assessment tool for palliative Journal of Palliative Nursing, Vol. 21, No. und Spiritualität in der September | Vol. 60, No. of September of spirituality assessment in palliative care patients in November 2014 | Progress in Palliative Care, Vol. 23, No. 4The for Spiritual A Mixed-Methods July | Oncology Nursing Vol. 42, No. 4The Integration of Religion and Spirituality in Social Practice: A May | Social Vol. 60, No. 3The and Educational of a Spiritual Life Review for Patients with and June 2014 | Journal of Cancer Education, Vol. 30, No. in Geriatric Palliative in Geriatric Medicine, Vol. No. An for Spiritual Well-Being May | Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, Vol. 34, No. Spiritual Assessment March | Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Vol. 21, No. American on Mental Health, and Help April | and Vol. 60, No. of Christian Nursing, Vol. 32, No. the Spiritual Needs and of Oncology Patients in Nursing Practice, Vol. 29, No. Care Training to Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic April | Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling: Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications, Vol. 69, No. analysis of spiritual
Medical Writings7 August 2001"Let Me See If I Have This Right …": Words That Help Build EmpathyJohn L. Coulehan, MD, Frederic W. Platt, MD, Barry Egener, MD, Richard Frankel, PhD, Chen-Tan Lin, MD, Beth Lown, MD, and William H. Salazar, MDJohn L. Coulehan, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, Frederic W. Platt, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, Barry Egener, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, Richard Frankel, PhDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, Chen-Tan Lin, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, Beth Lown, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902, and William H. Salazar, MDDr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00022 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Consider these two physician–patient dialogues:1. Patient: You know, when you discover a lump in your breast, you kind of feel—well, kind of—(her speech tapers off; she looks down; tears form in her eyes).Dr. A: When did you actually discover the lump?Patient: (absently) I don't know. It's been a while.2. Patient: (same as above)Dr. B: That sounds frightening.Patient: Well, yeah, sort of.Dr. B: Sort of frightening?Patient: Yeah … and I guess I'm feeling like my life is over.Dr. B: I see. Worried and sad too.Patient: That's it, Doctor.Dr. A's patient ...References1. Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, McMurray J, Pathman DE, Gerrity M, et al . Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. Society of General Internal Medicine. Med Care. 1999;37:1174-82. [PMID: 10549620] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Lundberg GD, Calkins DR, Newhouse JP, Leape LL, et al . The new medical marketplace: physicians' views. Health Aff Millwood. 1997;16:139-48. [PMID: 9314685] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Bates AS, Harris LE, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Dimensions and correlates of physician work satisfaction in a midwestern city. Med Care. 1998;36:610-7. [PMID: 9544600] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. McMurray JE, Williams E, Schwartz MD, Douglas J, Van Kirk J, Konrad TR, et al . Physician job satisfaction: developing a model using qualitative data. SGIM Career Satisfaction Study Group. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:711-4. [PMID: 9383141] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692-6. [PMID: 6486600] LinkGoogle Scholar6. Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283-7. [PMID: 9918487] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350-6. [PMID: 9002500] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. White J, Levinson W, Roter D. "Oh, by the way …": the closing moments of the medical visit. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:24-8. [PMID: 8133347] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Nightingale SD, Yarnold PR, Greenberg MS. Sympathy, empathy, and physician resource utilization. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:420-3. [PMID: 1744756] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Levinson W, Stiles WB, Inui TS, Engle R. Physician frustration in communicating with patients. Med Care. 1993;31:285-95. [PMID: 8464246] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. JAMA. 2000;284:1021-7. [PMID: 10944650] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin M. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits. Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Med Care. 1993;31:1083-92. [PMID: 8246638] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Cohen-Cole SA. The Medical Interview: The Three-Function Approach. St. Louis: Mosby; 1991. Google Scholar14. Coulehan JL, Block MR. The Medical Interview. Mastering Skills for Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2001. Google Scholar15. More ES. "Empathy" enters the profession of medicine.. In: More ES, Milligan MA, eds. The Empathic Practitioner. Empathy, Gender, and Medicine. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ Pr; 1994:19-39. Google Scholar16. Basch MF. Empathic understanding: a review of the concept and some theoretical considerations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1983;31:101-26. [PMID: 6681414] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Wispe L. History of the concept of empathy.. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J, eds. Empathy and Its Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Pr; 1987:17-37. Google Scholar18. Book HE. Empathy: misconceptions and misuses in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:420-4. [PMID: 3348445] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Buie DH. Empathy: its nature and limitations. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1981;29:281-307. [PMID: 7264177] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Wilmer HA. The doctor-patient relationship and the issues of pity, sympathy and empathy. Br J Med Psychol. 1968;41:243-8. [PMID: 5728595] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21. Strayer J. Affective and cognitive perspectives on empathy.. In: Eisenberg N, Strayer J, eds. Empathy and Its Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Pr; 1987:218-44. Google Scholar22. Brothers LA, Finch DM. Physiological evidence for an excitatory pathway from entorhinal cortex to amygdala in the rat. Brain Res. 1985;359:10-20. [PMID: 4075137] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23. Grattan LM, Eslinger PJ. Empirical study of empathy [Letter]. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146:1521-2. [PMID: 2619825] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24. Katz RL. Empathy: Its Nature and Uses. New York: Free Press; 1963:26. Google Scholar25. Lief HI, Fox RC. Training for "detached concern" in medical students.. In: Lief HI, eds. The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice. New York: Harper & Row; 1963:12-35. Google Scholar26. Halpern J. Empathy: Using resonance emotions in the service of curiosity.. In: Spiro H, McCrea Curnen MG, Peschel E, St James D, eds. Empathy and the Practice of Medicine. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ Pr; 1993:160-73. Google Scholar27. Wispe L. The distinction between sympathy and empathy: to call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50:314-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar28. Wilmer HA. The doctor-patient relationship and the issues of pity, sympathy and empathy. Br J Med Psychol. 1968;41:243-8. [PMID: 5728595] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29. Bertakis KD, Roter D, Putnam SM. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1991;32:175-81. [PMID: 1990046] MedlineGoogle Scholar30. Roter D, Lipkin M, Korsgaard A. Sex differences in patients' and physicians' communication during primary care medical visits. Med Care. 1991;29:1083-93. [PMID: 1943269] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31. Levinson W, Roter D. Physicians' psychosocial beliefs correlate with their patient communication skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:375-9. [PMID: 7472685] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32. Spiro H. What is empathy and can it be taught? Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:843-6. [PMID: 1482433] LinkGoogle Scholar33. Brock CD, Salinsky JV. Empathy: an essential skill for understanding the physician–patient relationship in clinical practice. Fam Med. 1993;25:245-8. [PMID: 8319851] MedlineGoogle Scholar34. Platt FW, Keller VF. Empathic communication: a teachable and learnable skill. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:222-6. [PMID: 8014729] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35. Platt FW, Platt CM. Empathy: a miracle or nothing at all? Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management. 1998;5:30-3. Google Scholar36. Suchman AL, Markakis K, Beckman HB, Frankel R. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. JAMA. 1997;277:678-82. [PMID: 9039890] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37. Charon R. The narrative road to empathy.. In: Spiro H, McCrea Curnen MG, Peschel E, St James D, eds. Empathy and the Practice of Medicine. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ Pr; 1993:147-59. Google Scholar38. Carson RA. Beyond respect to recognition and due regard.. In: Toombs SK, Barnard D, Carson RA, eds. Chronic Illness from Experience to Policy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ Pr; 1995:105-28. Google Scholar39. Hunter KM, Charon R, Coulehan JL. The study of literature in medical education. Acad Med. 1995;70:787-94. [PMID: 7669155] MedlineGoogle Scholar40. Novack DH, Suchman AL, Clark W, Epstein RM, Najberg E, Kaplan C. Calibrating the physician. Personal awareness and effective patient care. Working Group on Promoting Physician Personal Awareness, American Academy on Physician and Patient. JAMA. 1997;278:502-9. [PMID: 9256226] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41. Coulehan JL. Tenderness and steadiness: emotions in medical practice. Lit Med. 1995;14:222-36. [PMID: 8558910] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42. Connelly J. Being in the present moment: developing the capacity for mindfulness in medicine. Acad Med. 1999;74:420-4. [PMID: 10219225] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar43. Epstein RM. Mindful practice. JAMA. 1999;282:833-9. [PMID: 10478689] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar44. Miller SZ, Schmidt HJ. The habit of humanism: a framework for making humanistic care a reflexive clinical skill. Acad Med. 1999;74:800-3. [PMID: 10429589] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar45. Barrett-Lennard GT. The phases and focus of empathy. Br J Med Psychol. 1993;66 Pt 1 3-14. [PMID: 8485075] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar46. Gallop R, Lancee WJ, Garfinkel PE. The empathic process and its mediators. A heuristic model. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1990;178:649-54. [PMID: 2230750] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar47. Hall JA, Roter DL, Rand CS. Communication of affect between patient and physician. J Health Soc Behav. 1981;22:18-30. [PMID: 7240703] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar48. Larsen KM, Smith CK. Assessment of nonverbal communication in the patient–physician interview. J Fam Pract. 1981;12:481-8. [PMID: 7462949] MedlineGoogle Scholar49. Suchman AL, Matthews DA. What makes the patient-doctor relationship therapeutic? Exploring the connexional dimension of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:125-30. [PMID: 3276262] LinkGoogle Scholar50. Suchman AL. Control and Relation: Two Foundational Values and Their Consequences.. In: Suchman AL, Botelho RJ, Hinton-Walker P, eds. Partnerships in Healthcare: Transforming Relational Process. Rochester, NY: Univ of Rochester Pr; 1998. Google Scholar51. Branch WT, Malik TK. Using "windows of opportunities" in brief interviews to understand patients' concerns. JAMA. 1993;269:1667-8. [PMID: 8455300] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar52. Pinderhughes EB. Teaching empathy: ethnicity, race and power at the cross-cultural treatment interface. American Journal of Social Psychology. 1984;4:5-12. Google Scholar53. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251-8. [PMID: 626456] LinkGoogle Scholar54. Platt FW, Gaspar DL, Coulehan JL, Fox L, Adler AJ, Weston WW, et al . "Tell me about yourself": the patient-centered interview. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1079-85. LinkGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Dr. Coulehan: State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036Dr. Platt: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient; Portland, OR 97210Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital; Rochester, NY 14620Dr. Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; Denver, CO 80222Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital; Cambridge, MA 02238Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia; Augusta, GA 30902Corresponding Author: John L. Coulehan, MD, Department of Preventive Medicine, HSC L3-086, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036; e-mail, [email protected]sunysb.edu.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Coulehan: Department of Preventive Medicine, HSC L3-086, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8036.Drs. Platt and Lin: University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80222.Dr. Egener: American Academy on Physician and Patient, Legacy Clinic Northwest, 1130 NW 22nd Avenue, Suite 220, Portland, OR 97210.Dr. Frankel: Highland Hospital, 1000 South Avenue, Rochester, NY 14620.Dr. Lown: Mount Auburn Hospital, 300 Mt. Auburn Street, Cambridge, MA 02238.Dr. Salazar: Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, HS2010, Augusta, GA 30902. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByHow does narrative medicine impact medical trainees' learning of professionalism? A qualitative studyEmpathy in nurse-patient interaction: a conversation analysisPhysician empathy according to physicians: A multi-specialty qualitative analysisCompassion FatigueDefining clinical empathy: a grounded theory approach from the perspective of healthcare workers and patients in a multicultural settingEmpathy in patient care: from 'Clinical Empathy' to 'Empathic Concern'Introducing reflective narrative for first-year medical students to promote empathy as an integral part of physiology curriculumSoft Skills: The Case for Compassionate Approaches or How Behavior Analysis Keeps Finding Its HeartBedside Manner 2020: An Inventory of Best PracticesClinical Empathy for the Surgical Patient: Lessons From W.H. Auden's Prose and PoetryCraving Empathy: Studying the Sustained Impact of Empathy Training on CliniciansThe Development of Empathy and Associated Factors during Medical Education: A Longitudinal StudyComparison of self-reported empathy levels among dental undergraduate students in Northern India: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional studyThe role of compassion in ethical frameworks and medical practiceSearching for the erosion of empathy in medical undergraduate students: a longitudinal studyImproving Interactions with Healthcare Robots: A Review of Communication Behaviours in Social and Healthcare ContextsDevelopment and piloting of a Situational Judgement Test for emotion-handling skills using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES)The impact of therapeutic alliance in physical therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review of the literatureFeelings Behind a Face: a Medical Student Counseling Workshop in Facial Reconstructive SurgeryAchieving positive outcomes in complex cases: The Admiral Nurse Dementia Helpline (Innovative Practice)Psychological phenomena in the doctor- Elderly patient relationshipApplying a critical race lens to relationship‐centered care in pregnancy and childbirth: An antidote to structural racismHow do perceptions of verbal statements and nonverbal actions as empathetic differ by medical appointment context?Practices to Foster Physician Presence and Connection With Patients in the Clinical EncounterRapport, Empathy and Professional Identity: Some Challenges for International Medical Graduates Speaking English as a Second or Foreign LanguageUnder what circumstances can immigrant patients and healthcare professionals co-produce health? - an interpretive scoping reviewClinical sympathy: the important role of affectivity in clinical practiceEmpathy in computer-mediated interactions: A conceptual framework for research and clinical practice.Psychotherapist's empathic responses to client's troubles telling/feelings talk in psychotherapy: A conversation analysisHow does medical education affect empathy and compassion in medical students? A meta-ethnography: BEME Guide No. 57Empathy in psychotherapy: Using conversation analysis to explore the therapists' empathic interaction with clientsThe Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial's Standard of Care Control Condition: Rationale and Description of a Patient-Centered ProtocolMultidisciplinary Teaming: Enhancing Collaboration through Increased UnderstandingCommunication in Health CareCommunication in Surgery for Patient SafetyAgents of empathy: How medical interpreters bridge sociocultural gaps in genomic sequencing disclosures with Spanish-speaking familiesThe development and psychometric validation of a Chinese empathy motivation scaleEmpathic and compassionate healthcare as a Christian spiritual practiceObesity bias among preclinical and clinical chiropractic students and faculty at an integrative health care institution: A cross-sectional studyEmpathy: From Attribute to RelationshipInfluences on students' empathy in medical education: an exploratory interview study with medical students in their third and last yearTeaching future doctors to communicate: a communication intervention for medical students in their clinical yearEmpathy in general practice: its meaning for patients and doctorsEmpathically designed responses as a gateway to advice in Dutch counseling callsAnnotating and modeling empathy in spoken conversationsEmpathy can make the difference. How?The Effect of Patient Participation through Physician's Resources on Experience and WellbeingDepression/AnxietySuffering, Hope, and HealingA Review of Empathy, Its Importance, and Its Teaching in Surgical TrainingAthletes' Perception of Athletic Trainer Empathy: How Important Is It?Empathy from the perspective of oncology nursesPatients' Trust in Physician, Patient Enablement, and Health-Related Quality of Life During Colon Cancer TreatmentMeasuring Medical Students' EmpathyEmpathy in the Clinician–Patient RelationshipComparing two types of perspective taking as strategies for detecting distress amongst parents of children with cancer: A randomised trialIf You Could Read My Mind: The Role of Healthcare Providers' Empathic and Communicative Competencies in Clients' Satisfaction with ConsultationsPatients who are anxious or fearfulFatigue: Has It Affected Your Compassion?Study on Empathy among Undergraduate Students of the Medical Profession in NepalPower Relations and Health Care Communication in Older Adulthood: Educating Recipients and ProvidersBreast Biopsies are Minimally Painful, Exceed Patient Expectations, and Do Not Represent a Genuine Lasting Harm for Most WomenSpirituality and Ubuntu as the foundation for building African institutions, organizations and leadersShowing you care: An empathetic approach to doctor–patient communicationEmpathy and affect: what can empathied bodies do?Computational Analysis and Simulation of Empathic Behaviors: a Survey of Empathy with in medical students and empathy is with differences in communication and in empathy: the to clinical and at the of Social of What it to of changing empathy and patient in healthcare to for and Chronic medical communication: the of by Care A and of the Therapy of undergraduate and students medical A longitudinal studyEmpathy: what does it for A qualitative empathic and compassionate patient care: education and to the Patient with and Student Empathy in Medical Students During a Clinical and patients' perspectives on empathy: of and treatment of Approaches to the of and of a Communication in for of Healthcare as a do primary care when patients during and of the of the in a general medicine Patient Satisfaction for the . . . of of Care in the development of doctor-patient a call and a care: Enhancing physician–patient communication and education in of to Hope, and of empathy in general practice: a systematic with of Cancer Patient: of an of empathy and correlates among types of in empathic in primary care for research and with an to patients in A new perspective on empathic A for about and in longitudinal study of in interaction in treatment of in empathy medical role of and in medical education: the as as the approach to an empathic understanding of among patients and in the of The of Role of Empathy in Therapy and the New Communication Skills Assessment by Patients and and EmpathyEmpathy and Its A Review of With Medical Students and the nature of in the for health and the does care of the of of a with by among and of A to for and to clinical empathic a of Empathy with Behavior Medical Communication in in for Communication to and Patient to and A of and Cancer the and of clinical empathy: A theoretical and a research of communication in the medical A review and Clinical Empathy: An about to Physician during Care MD, H. PhD, M. MD, and and role in education about care in Competencies in Care for and Communication in patients with in the Care of Cancer in of and of Empathic during When Being Not empathy learning for be and for effective the role of care in with and in the of the medicine and outcomes of physician empathy in A structural focus study of and perceptions of the of of Medical Student role of empathy in in the a new and in the a of the An or Do You to to Patients Do Not or with Challenges and a of of the of a for children with Care. A to in care: The role of perceptions in Older in Clinical during Health and H. or Not to Is That the Right empathy and sympathy: responses to troubles on a health care with to make the patient the Communication and With Patients in Your as a of The of Medicine, and How to and A Patient-Centered Communication Illness Using to Communication Care and Social in the office approach to the Words That in to and MD, M. MD, and Frederic Platt, I Student August August August by American College of
Telemedicine and e-HealthVol. 26, No. 9 OpinionFree AccessTechnology Literacy as a Barrier to Telehealth During COVID-19Austin J. Triana, Roman E. Gusdorf, Kaustav P. Shah, and Sara N. HorstAustin J. TrianaVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.Search for more papers by this author, Roman E. GusdorfVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.Search for more papers by this author, Kaustav P. ShahVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.Search for more papers by this author, and Sara N. HorstAddress correspondence to: Sara N. Horst, MD, MPH, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Avenue South, Medical Arts Building Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37232, USA E-mail Address: [email protected]Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:10 Sep 2020https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0155AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there have been many fundamental changes to the health care system, one of which has been the rapid adoption of telehealth.1 Despite technological capability for widespread implementation before the pandemic, telehealth remained limited in many areas of the United States due to state regulations and poor insurance reimbursement.2 When these policies changed in March 2020 with national widespread coverage for telemedicine, traditional clinical workflows attempted to rapidly shift to a virtual format to increase social distancing and protect vulnerable patients. At our institution alone, the number of telehealth visits increased from ∼15 per day to >2,000 per day in a matter of weeks.As the health care system rapidly reorganized and trained physicians on how to host videoconference visits, some patients have struggled to keep up. During these changes, providers reported that many patients were struggling to access their telemedicine appointments. Patients may have difficulty navigating their devices and entering the health care system virtually. Others simply do not have devices or a stable Wi-Fi to connect with providers from home. Technology literacy and access should be viewed as a major driver of health and needs to be on a large scale.As an example, Ms. P is a 70-year-old woman with diabetes and hypertension who knows she is high risk for complications from COVID-19. Taking extra precautions, she cancelled her in-person appointments and scheduled a telehealth visit with one of her providers. She spent an entire afternoon preparing her technology for the visit, but she could not connect to the virtual appointment. Despite a proactive mindset, she had difficulty downloading the necessary software. Recognizing this barrier to care Ms. P and other patients face, we started a medical student-led volunteer initiative to help patients set up and test devices for their telemedicine appointments. We rapidly created systematic processes for recruitment, volunteer training, clinic coverage, and operational support. A standardized phone script helped students guide patients as they downloaded the proper software and understood what to expect at the time of the visit.Within a month, we have had 135 medical student volunteers commit 1,300 h and assist >5,000 patients in preparing for upcoming telehealth visits. Along the way, we have seen a wide range of patient comfort with technology that has advanced our understanding of technology literacy. One patient, a computer programmer, initially scoffed when asked whether he needed help. However, he still appreciated the tip that he received about which web browser to use to access his visit, avoiding a glitch that kept some patients from connecting. For patients low self-reported technology literacy, our impact can be great. Many patients had never downloaded a smartphone application or used videoconferencing software before their first virtual appointment. Wary of hackers and scammers, another patient was strongly opposed to telehealth and wanted to cancel his visit, but after talking about the safety of the process with a student, he downloaded the software and had a successful telemedicine visit with his provider.If a patient cannot connect to the videoconference, the provider is forced to call the patient to troubleshoot over the phone, reschedule the appointment, or simply proceed without video. Prior work has shown that the video component significantly contributes to quality and satisfaction of the visit.3 In addition to the technology itself, patients need to know what to expect for their telehealth appointments. Ideally, a patient will have a medication list and be in a quiet and private location at the time of the visit. Therefore, it is important to communicate these expectations beforehand to avoid a visit that takes place from the grocery store or in the car.With the ability to see patients in their own environments, we also gain insight into their lives. Using videoconferencing, it is possible to see a patient's home, to contextualize their experiences, and to better utilize the biopsychosocial model of health. One patient was blind but wanted to use videoconferencing so that the provider could see him. A volunteer helped the patient and his able-sighted daughter navigate the telehealth process using accessibility features for blindness. As medical students who grew up immersed in technology, we have been humbled by the complexity of teaching others to navigate smartphones, web browsers, and applications, and we have seen the tremendous technology gaps in various patient populations.Outside the context of direct patient care, widespread adoption of telehealth has the potential to improve quality of life and health outcomes through additional synergies. Although many older adults perceive benefits from technology, common barriers include self-efficacy, cost, and privacy concerns.4 Prior research has shown that technology adoption can be improved through education and increasing perceived self-efficacy.5 If patients can better navigate their web browsers and applications, they may feel empowered to message their providers through the patient portal or look up healthy recipes online.Among the drastic changes in health care, we hope that updated regulations and improved insurance coverage will be permanent, improving access for patients by addressing issues related to distance, mobility, or health concerns. Licensure across state lines remains a big question that could drastically impact access for many patients. In addition, it is imperative to further understand and address how to help our patients access and use technology. The transition to telehealth requires time, patience, and resources—an investment that is crucial for patients who are at risk of being left behind.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Drs. Michelle Griffith and Eiman Jahangir for organizational support of this project as well as reviewing and editing drafts.Disclosure StatementNo competing financial interests exist.Funding InformationNo funding was received for this article.References1. Smith A, Thomas E, Snoswell C, Haydon H, Mehrotra A, Clemensen J, Caffery Lj. Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare. 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567 (last accessed May 15, 2020). Google Scholar2. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med 2016;375:154–161. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. McLendon SF. Interactive video telehealth models to improve access to diabetes specialty care and education in the rural setting: A systematic review. Diabetes Spectr 2017;30:124–136. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018;24:4–12. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Gatti FM, Brivio E, Galimberti C. "The future is ours too": A training process to enable the learning perception and increase self-efficacy in the use of tablets in the elderly. Educ Gerontol 2017;43:209–224. Crossref, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited bySatisfaction with telemedicine use during COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a systematic review10 January 2024 | Libyan Journal of Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 1How COVID-19 impacts telehealth: an empirical study of telehealth services, users and the use of metaverse1 February 2024 | Connection Science, Vol. 36, No. 1Experiences of telehealth among people receiving alcohol and other drug treatment during the COVID ‐19 pandemic: Implications for future telehealth delivery28 December 2023 | Drug and Alcohol Review, Vol. 43, No. 3The effect of patient positioning on the accuracy and reliability of assessment of knee range of motion over a telemedicine platform9 October 2021 | Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 30, No. 2Delivering COVID-19 Vaccine via Trusted Social Services: Program Evaluation Results from the Chicagoland CEAL Program12 July 2023 | Journal of Community Health, Vol. 49, No. 1The psychometric properties and feasibility of the Alberta infant motor scale used in telehealth: A scoping reviewEarly Human Development, Vol. 189Age-related smartphone use patterns among individuals with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury20 December 2023 | Brain Injury, Vol. 38, No. 1Reliability of Visual Field Testing in a Telehealth Setting Using a Head-Mounted Device: A Pilot Study14 August 2023 | Journal of Glaucoma, Vol. 33, No. 1Open Dialogue Through TelehealthTranslation, cultural adaptation and validity assessment of the Dutch version of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire: a mixed-method approach30 May 2023 | BMC Public Health, Vol. 23, No. 1Digital health and acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 27th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup14 August 2023 | Nature Reviews Nephrology, Vol. 19, No. 12Standardising the role of a digital navigator in behavioural health: a systematic reviewThe Lancet Digital Health, Vol. 5, No. 12Teleophthalmology and retina: a review of current tools, pathways and services5 December 2023 | International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, Vol. 9, No. 1Comparison of Delivery of Care Before and During COVID-19 Within an Academic Outpatient Psychiatry Practice Kelly C. Lee, Kristen L. Duarte, Eve Lasswell, Ashley L. Clark, Savita G. Bhakta, and Katia M. Harlé8 December 2023 | Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 29, No. 12The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rates and predictors of missed hospital appointments in multiple outpatient clinics of The Royal Hospital, Sultanate of Oman: a retrospective study19 December 2023 | BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 23, No. 1Evaluation of a Physical Therapist-Delivered Technology Literacy Algorithm and Protocol for Older Adults: A Pilot StudyCureus, Vol. 28Telehealth and telemedicine prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis18 November 2023 | Hospital Practice, Vol. 51, No. 5Practical Strategies for Addressing Video Visit Access Barriers in Urology1 September 2023 | JU Open Plus, Vol. 1, No. 9Establishing a Centralized Virtual Visit Support Team: Early Insights8 August 2023 | Healthcare, Vol. 11, No. 16Evaluation of telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic across service users, carers and clinicians: an international mixed-methods study11 August 2023 | BMJ Mental Health, Vol. 26, No. 1A sociotechnical framework for integration of telehealth into clinical workflow15 May 2023 | IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3Telemedicina y asma grave en nuestro entorno: reflexiones sobre la experiencia de los profesionales y propuestas para hacerla realidadOpen Respiratory Archives, Vol. 5, No. 3Habit reversal training for excoriation disorder: Differential outcomes of telehealth versus in-person treatmentsPsychiatry Research Case Reports, Vol. 2, No. 1The Risk Mitigation Decision-Making Model for Music Therapy Services During the Covid-19 Pandemic28 April 2023 | Music Therapy Perspectives, Vol. 41, No. 1Competencies for video telemedicine with older adult patients23 March 2023 | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 71, No. 4Using data analytics for telehealth utilization: A case study in Arkansas7 March 2023 | Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 28' Without support CALD patients will be left behind ': A mixed-methods exploration of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) client perspectives of telehealth and those of their healthcare providers16 February 2023 | Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, Vol. 19Determinants of COVID-19 Knowledge, Perception and Attitudes in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey20 February 2023 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 20, No. 4'The key to this is not so much the technology. It's the individual who is using the technology': Perspectives on telehealth delivery for autistic adults during the COVID-19 pandemic6 July 2022 | Autism, Vol. 27, No. 2Effects of a Metacognitive Smartphone Intervention With Weekly Mentoring Sessions for Individuals With Schizophrenia: A Quasi-Experimental StudyJournal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, Vol. 61, No. 2Are we ready for Telepsychiatry? Benefits and challenges of digital psychotherapy27 February 2023 | Current Problems of Psychiatry, Vol. 24New Technologies (Tele-Health and Other Trends) Directed in Neurology and Psychiatric Disorders in Home Care13 June 2023The qualitative experience of telehealth access and clinical encounters in Australian healthcare during COVID-19: implications for policy15 January 2022 | Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1Integration of Telehealth into Contemporary Pharmacy PracticeSynchronous Telehealth Yoga and Cognitive Processing Group Therapies for Women Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Adapted for COVID-19 Belle Zaccari, Jennifer M. Loftis, Terri Haywood, Kimberly Hubbard, Jennifer Clark, and Ursula Ann Kelly2 November 2022 | Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 28, No. 11Telehealth care before and during COVID-19: Trends and quality in a large health system3 October 2022 | JAMIA OpenVirtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients25 August 2022 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 17Evaluating Resource Utilization for In-Person and Virtual Joint Classes in Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Attendance Patterns at a Large Metropolitan Health SystemThe Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 37, No. 9Social Cognitive Theory to Assess the Intention to Participate in the Facebook Metaverse by Citizens in Peru during the COVID-19 PandemicJournal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 8, No. 3Co-Designing Together through Crisis: Development of a Virtual Care Guidance Document to Support Providers, Older Adults, and Caregivers18 August 2022 | Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Vol. 10Connected Health Innovation Research Program (C.H.I.R.P.): A bridge for digital health and wellness in cardiology and oncologyAmerican Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice, Vol. 20Diabetes nurse practitioners in the shadow of the COVID‐19 pandemic: Challenges, insights, and suggestions for improvement1 December 2021 | Journal of Nursing Scholarship, Vol. 54, No. 4Flexibility to manage and enhance quality of life among people with motor neurone disease23 November 2020 | Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 44, No. 12Aligning Virtual Care in Canada with the Needs of Older Adults13 April 2022 | Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Vol. 16Remote Monitoring for Prediction and Management of Acute Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD)29 March 2022 | Life, Vol. 12, No. 4Telehealth Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health: A Novel Screening Tool to Support Vulnerable Patient Equity22 February 2022 | Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports, Vol. 6, No. 1Diabetes Tracker and Volunteer+ Software Engineering for SustainabilityDoes Connected Health Technology Improve Health-Related Outcomes in Rural Cardiac Populations? Systematic Review Narrative Synthesis17 February 2022 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 4A Visualized and Scientometric Analysis of Health Literacy Research25 January 2022 | Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 9TechnologyUse of digital technologies in mental health during COVID-191 January 2022 | Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), Vol. 39Coaching to Support Mental Health Apps: Exploratory Narrative Review8 March 2022 | JMIR Human Factors, Vol. 9, No. 1Gap in Willingness and Access to Video Visit Use Among Older High-risk Veterans: Cross-sectional Study8 April 2022 | Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 24, No. 4A 3-Item Measure of Digital Health Care Literacy: Development and Validation Study29 April 2022 | JMIR Formative Research, Vol. 6, No. 4Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Delivery of Mental Health Services and Telemental Health: Systematic Review22 August 2022 | JMIR Mental Health, Vol. 9, No. 8Expansion of telehealth in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: benefits and barriers1 February 2022 | Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Vol. 34, No. 2Görme Engelli Bireylerin Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecine İlişkin Deneyimleri30 December 2021 | Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, Vol. Covid-19 Özel Sayı Cilt 1Usability of Telemedicine Mobile Applications during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: A Heuristic Evaluation of Patient User Interfaces18 November 2021 | Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 11Impact of remote delivery of clinical pharmacy services on health disparities and access to care17 October 2021 | JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, Vol. 4, No. 11A "Not So Quiet" Revolution: Systemic Benefits and Challenges of Telehealth in the Context of COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada)5 October 2021 | Frontiers in Digital Health, Vol. 3Documented Reasons of Cancellation and Rescheduling of Telehealth Appointments During the Pandemic Emre Sezgin, Yungui Huang, Deborah Lin, Ujjwal Ramtekkar, Lindsey Pauline, and Simon Lin8 October 2021 | Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 27, No. 10Digital Clinics and Mobile Technology Implementation for Mental Health Care7 May 2021 | Current Psychiatry Reports, Vol. 23, No. 7Considerations on the Implementation of the Telemedicine System Encountered with Stakeholders' Resistance in COVID-19 Pandemic Ah Young Kim and Woo Seok Choi7 May 2021 | Telemedicine and e-Health, Vol. 27, No. 5Early acceptability of a mobile app for contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic: French national online survey. (Preprint)5 February 2021 | JMIR mHealth and uHealthDeterminants of Catalan Public Primary Care Professionals' Intention to Use Digital Clinical Consultations (eConsulta) in the Post–COVID-19 Context: Mixed Methods Study24 June 2021 | Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 23, No. 6Pediatric behavioral telehealth in the age of COVID-19: Brief evidence review and practice considerationsCurrent Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, Vol. 51, No. 1Digital HealthSeminars in Oncology Nursing, Vol. 36, No. 6Asking the Right Questions—Human Factors Considerations for Telemedicine Design29 August 2020 | Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, Vol. 20, No. 11A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreakApplied Soft Computing, Vol. 96Telemedicine Across the Globe-Position Paper From the COVID-19 Pandemic Health System Resilience PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) International Consortium (Part 1)16 October 2020 | Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 8 Volume 26Issue 9Sep 2020 InformationCopyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Austin J. Triana, Roman E. Gusdorf, Kaustav P. Shah, and Sara N. Horst.Technology Literacy as a Barrier to Telehealth During COVID-19.Telemedicine and e-Health.Sep 2020.1118-1119.http://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0155Published in Volume: 26 Issue 9: September 10, 2020Online Ahead of Print:May 19, 2020 TopicsCOVID-19e-health and telehealth careTelehealth devices PDF download
More than with any other imaging modality, the medical use of ultrasound is highly operator-dependent. The potential for diagnostic error is magnified by the ongoing development of increasingly sophisticated equipment with extended applications. A gap is appearing between the sophistication of the most advanced machines and techniques and the skills of those expected to use them and interpret the images produced, due to a lack of training. Whilst many obstetricians and gynecologists in training attend courses addressing the finer points of, for example, cardiac Doppler, central nervous system posterior fossa imaging or three-dimensional endometrial visualization, relatively few are willing to attend courses on basic theoretical and practical ultrasound techniques. There are a few exceptions, for example in Scandinavia, where basic courses are mandatory. Are there steps missing in the training of doctors in the specialty? The impression we have is that there exists a relatively small number of talented and skilled ultrasound practitioners seeking to hone their skills ever more precisely, whilst many perfectly competent clinicians are perhaps less enthusiastic and more fearful of ultrasound as they have simply not been taught the basics. The answer should be yes. Modern obstetrics and gynecology practice is virtually impossible without the use of ultrasound. That does not mean that all obstetricians and gynecologists need to be experts in ultrasound. Certain aspects of the specialty require specific skills that are more important than ultrasound—for instance, gynecological oncology and urogynecology require surgical expertise, whilst maternal medicine requires specific medical knowledge. Nevertheless, it is clearly desirable for all obstetricians and gynecologists to have been trained robustly in basic sonographic skills so that their scanning in antenatal and gynecological clinics and on the labor ward is both safe and reproducible. Moreover, in order to gain maximum clinical benefit and to achieve optimal use of resources, there is a need for all ultrasound operators to have appropriate skills to perform and interpret ultrasound examinations. The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) has developed guidelines for basic education in obstetrics and gynecology (approved in June 2005). For ultrasound, the basic competence levels are defined only in broad terms. With respect to obstetric ultrasound, the trainee should have ‘detailed theoretical knowledge of the normal and abnormal anatomy of the fetus, placenta and amniotic fluid compartment, estimation of gestational age, fetal biometry, fetal growth and behaviour, [and] of the evaluation of fetal and uteroplacental blood flow’1. In gynecological ultrasound the trainee should have ‘detailed theoretical knowledge of ultrasonic aspects of normal pelvic anatomy; gynaecological disease; infertility and ultrasound guided invasive procedures’1. In addition, each trainee should have a log book listing 200 antenatal obstetric scans and 100 gynecological scans2. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) is more detailed in its minimum training recommendations for the practice of medical ultrasound3. For Level 1 (basic competence level) in gynecological ultrasound, EFSUMB recommends that trainees should perform a minimum of 300 examinations under supervision and keep an illustrated log book of 20 documented cases. They should receive a minimum of 20 hours of theoretical tuition, preferably at the beginning of the training period. For Level 1 in obstetric ultrasound the recommendations are that the trainee performs a minimum of 500 examinations under supervision, producing a log book listing the types of examinations, and receives 30 hours of theoretical tuition3. In 1996, ISUOG (the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology) Education Committee produced the most ambitious proposal in their ‘Update on proposed minimum standards for ultrasound training for residents in Ob/Gyn’4. This document describes the contents of a basic theory course and required practical skills. It recommends that for certification a trainee should have 100 hours of supervised scanning including 100 gynecological and 200 obstetric scans. A log book with 30 cases with ultrasound images (including 15 fetal anomalies) should be included. Theoretical (multiple choice or written exam of three or four cases) and practical (transvaginal and fetal anomaly scan—30 min for both) examinations were recommended. ISUOG may decide to update this proposal, but in the meantime its Clinical Standards Committee has provided practical advice in the form of guidelines for individual types of exam. The difficulty in creating consistency in training standards throughout Europe has led to the separate and independent development of ultrasound training approaches in individual countries. We have, through contact with colleagues in other countries, performed an informal survey comparing ultrasound training in obstetrics and gynecology in some European countries. The results are presented in Table 1, which demonstrates that European countries differ in their formal definitions and requirements for basic obstetric and gynecological ultrasound training. Theoretical knowledge is taught in basic and intermediate ultrasound courses. Some countries test the theoretical knowledge in course exams, whilst in the UK, membership of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (MRCOG) requires an ‘overall’ exam including all subject areas, of which only a small fraction will include ultrasound. Some do not assess theoretical knowledge among trainees at all. Whilst most systems require formalized theoretical teaching, ‘hands-on’ practical supervision is rarely formalized. Yet, this is the most critical aspect of basic training. Most hands-on supervision for trainees is probably ad hoc in an opportunistic, unstructured way in clinics and wards, rather than being arranged in advance with clear educational goals. Log books and check lists are frequently used to document a certain number of scans, and the quality of images can be checked by a supervisor. However, achieving a particular number of scans does not equate to a certain level of competence. We suggest that four aspects should be discussed and decided upon: This has been proposed previously by EBCOG, EFSUMB and ISUOG. However, a problem is that definitions vary and do not seem to be implemented uniformly in European countries (Table 1). In the UK, basic ultrasound training for obstetric ultrasound (though not gynecological ultrasound) has recently become mandatory and comprises two modules. The goal of training is that each trainee should be able to carry out a dating scan at 8–12 weeks and to undertake some aspects of late pregnancy scanning, for example amniotic fluid index assessment, fetal presentation, placental site and aspects of basic fetal biometry. While these may appear to be modest goals for basic training, they are a marked improvement: now all UK trainees will be expected to achieve at least basic competence. Training must be offered and standards maintained, for which a robust assessment process is critical. However, the assessment process in European countries is variable (Table 1) and only a few countries have nationally applied assessment guidelines or tools. There are specific national considerations. In the UK, for example, objective and reproducible assessments are evidenced by RCOG (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) workplace-based assessments, which may be completed by medical or non-medical training supervisors. These include Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs), Case Based Discussions (CBDs) and mini-CEXs (Clinical Examinations). Web-based resources to support trainers are available on the RCOG website5, along with the RCOG curriculum, assessment tools and information6. Both sonographers and obstetricians/gynecologists may, where appropriately qualified, perform assessments7. This is important because in the UK, the majority of obstetric ultrasound examinations are carried out by sonographers. Indication for ultrasound investigations, the sonographic appearance of normal anatomy in the standard planes, the correct settings of an ultrasound system as well as safety issues can easily be taught in conventional ways (lectures, books, videos), but the practical usage of an ultrasound system and, in particular, handling of the ultrasound probes (positioning, insonation angle) and adjustments for fetal movements and positional changes must be taught on a one-to-one basis. Once these basic abilities have been mastered, however, there are some other potentially useful educational tools: Online lectures. Several societies and dedicated individuals offer educational lectures on the Internet, ranging from basic to very advanced topics. ISUOG, for example, offers the contents of several ultrasound courses, covering both obstetric and gynecological topics, in full-media format (audio and video). While many of these lectures cover advanced topics, some also address concepts such as the fetal cardiac screening exam. These lectures are available for all members from ISUOG's website (www.isuog.org). In several European countries, trainees are able to access the ISUOG website through a free membership program. Multimedia-based self-study, using offline material (CD ROM). CD ROMS have been produced by various authors, including ISUOG, who offer an educational series of CD ROMS, some produced jointly with The Fetal Medicine Foundation, London (downloadable from ISUOG's website). Ultrasound simulators. Ultrasound simulators in basic obstetric and gynecological ultrasound training have been studied, but only sparsely, and their applicability for basic training has been disputed8, 9. However, once basic abilities (use of the ultrasound system, handling of the probes, acquisition of standard images) have been achieved by a trainee, there may be a possible role for digitally preserved pathological specimens both in basic and advanced training10, 11. EBCOG has representatives from all European countries and could agree on a structure for basic and intermediate ultrasound training, allowing harmonization between different European countries. The potential for putting together a joint course curriculum and for combining and sharing existing teaching material and expertise between the national societies is unarguable. ISUOG has come a long way in advanced women's imaging education, arranging well-attended, high-quality conferences, producing a top-ranked journal and providing a large and growing body of media-rich lectures and other tools on its website. The focus so far has, however, been on developing the skills of already competent ultrasound practitioners. We therefore suggest that the time is right to team up in order to craft a basic training program for ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology that is geared towards residents' training. Without doctors being taught the basics, they are unlikely to become confident and competent advanced ultrasound practitioners. It is unrealistic to expect an overall and unified European ultrasound training scheme, though with increasing movement of doctors and patients within Europe this might be desirable. But there is no reason why a template for basic, intermediate and advanced training, both theoretical and practical, cannot be developed jointly between national bodies and supranational organizations. How this training is provided and assessed will differ from country to country, but a template may at least guide national societies to improve ultrasound education for all obstetricians/gynecologists. This will be rewarded by safer and more confident clinical management of patients in both obstetrics and gynecology. The Authors are very grateful to Kurt Biedermann, Gianluigi Pilu, Ann Tabor, Lil Valentin, Klaus Vetter and Yves Ville for provision of information used in the construction of Table 1 of this article.
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Indonesia, 19.2% out of all cancers [1]. In 1992, most breast cancer patients (60-70%) sought medical treatment when the cancers were in late stages (stage III and IV) [2]. Thirty years later data collected from several teaching hospitals in Indonesia shows that 68- 73% of breast cancer patients come to medical centers in the late stages [3,4,5]. It is interesting to learn why the number of late-stage breast cancer patients in Indonesia remains the same despite the advancement in early detection and therapeutical measures. This editorial will mainly discuss one factor contributing to the diagnostic and treatment delay: patients’ accessibility to proper medical attention. Accessibility to proper medical attention for breast cancer patients in Indonesia depends on the number and distribution of trained oncologists, a concise referral system, and supportive regulation. Indonesia is a vast archipelago country with a population of more than 273 million people. In tertiary medical centers, breast cancer patients are attended by surgical oncologists since surgery is the main treatment. As per February 2002, there are only 233 surgical oncologists practicing. This number is far below the ratio proposed by the Indonesian Society of Surgical Oncologists (Perhimpunan Ahli Bedah Onkologi Indonesia/PERABOI) which is 0.2 per 100,000 population (546 surgical oncologists needed). This number is still below the ideal ratio which is twice as much. However, setting a goal too high would make the organization frustrated, hence the revised target. The role of oncologists is vital in breast cancer cases. A multinational analysis shows that being diagnosed with breast cancer by an oncologist correlates with shorter treatment delay [6]. It takes at least 6 years of general surgery training plus 2 more years of surgical oncology training to produce a surgical oncologist. This does not count the 2-5 years of working experience required before a general surgeon could apply for the surgical oncologist training. Acceleration is critical to producing more surgical oncologists, either by establishing more training centers or by modifying the training system. Establishing a surgical oncology training center is no simple procedure; especially since UU Pendidikan Kedokteran number 20/ 2013 mandates that medical specialist training must be university-based [7]. The government should consider the role of hospital-based training to accelerate the production of surgical oncologists. The revision of the law is underway that would recognize the role of professional society and collegium in medical specialist training. Acceleration can also be carried out through modifying the training system: from subspecialist training to specialist training. A general practitioner can enroll for the surgical oncology training without having to be a general surgeon first. The role of “collegium” is vital to ensure that the training curricula meet the requirement despite the cutting down of training time. Nevertheless, modification of the training system will take years unless there is government intervention to simplify the regulations. Another alternative to increase the number of competent surgeons attending breast cancer patients is by establishing a crash program in surgical oncology for general surgeons. The program would train general surgeons in early detection, proper treatment, and the vital knowledge of “when to refer” to tertiary medical centers so that the patients could have the best possible treatment. The lack in the number of surgical oncologists is worsened by the uneven distribution throughout the country. More than 50% practice in big cities in Java Island leaving some distant provinces with only one or two surgical oncologists. Distribution is vital so that expert medical advice is accessible throughout the country. The public health system and private insurance may cover the direct cost of breast cancer care but not the indirect costs such as traveling expenses to reach distant medical centers. The indirect cost is one factor contributing to patients’ delay to seek breast cancer care [8,9]. A study in Yogyakarta shows that various out-of-pocket expenses such as transportation and logistics linked to presentation, diagnosis, and subsequent breast cancer treatment remain a financial burden and hinder the patient from seeking early medical treatment [10]. The government needs to work closely together with the Society to regulate the distribution of surgical oncologists throughout the country. Indonesian Journal of Cancer, Vol 16(1), 1–2, March 2022 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33371/ijoc.v16i1.920 www.indonesianjournalofcancer.or.id P-ISSN: 1978-3744 E-ISSN: 2355-6811 2 | A breast cancer referral system that concisely states “what and when” to refer to tertiary medical care is necessary to prevent referral delay. A study in a tertiary medical center in Surabaya shows that only 13,8% of the patient comes through the referral system [11]. This shows some dysfunctions in our country’s referral system. It is necessary to prepare a breast cancer referral guideline for physicians in primary and secondary medical centers. Lack of concise referral guidelines may result in some early breast cancer patients getting inadequate surgical oncology treatment in secondary medical centers and later coming to the tertiary medical center in a more advanced stage. Reformation of some regulations is imperative in ensuring patient access to proper medical attention. Laws that regulate medical specialist training need to be reformed in order to accelerate the production and national distribution of much demanded surgical oncologists. It is necessary to establish regulation on the breast cancer referral system to avoid referral delay in secondary medical centers. There is also an urgent need to re-evaluate the regulation of the national health financing system, which often contributes to hospital delay of breast cancer treatment. Aiming for reducing the number of late-stage breast cancer in Indonesia is a gigantic work. From the medical standpoint, it is crucial that breast cancer patients have access to proper medical attention as early as possible. Accelerating the production of surgical oncologists, ensuring their even distribution throughout the country, improving the breast cancer referral system, and reforming some regulations are indispensable measures to take. Thirty years ago, we had 60-70% late-stage breast cancer. Nowadays sadly we have similar numbers. And if we do not take necessary actions, thirty years from now we will not see much difference in the number. It would seem that breast cancer care in Indonesia is marching in place.
Updated American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) antiemetic guidelines recommend olanzapine for the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Inadequate treatment of CINV can result in compounding physical sequelae, ultimately affecting patients' tolerance and recovery throughout chemotherapy treatment. Regional Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) data have identified a wide range of compliance rates in the appropriate prescribing of olanzapine. Literature has shown that olanzapine is safe and effective for the treatment of acute and delayed CINV. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to improve the compliance rate of appropriate prescribing of olanzapine for CINV for adult patients receiving HEC within the project site's outpatient oncology clinic. The project was based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model and implemented in an outpatient oncology clinic in a Midwestern urban area over a 6-month time period. A multidisciplinary and interactive education program was delivered to providers. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected by impartial, independent auditors. At monthly provider staff meetings, a presentation was provided to prescribers supplying information on the updated antiemetic guideline recommendations and the pharmacodynamics of olanzapine. An olanzapine frequently asked questions (FAQ) sheet was also provided to reinforce the reviewed material. Data collected following implementation showed an increase in appropriate prescribing of olanzapine from 82.05% to 94.74% (n = 76). A standard deviation Z-test for two population proportions showed the positive change in compliance rate was statistically significant at p < .05 where p was calculated at .02852. A sustainability audit 1 year after completion showed the rate of appropriate prescribing of olanzapine at 92.59% (n = 27), representing a decrease of 2.15 percentage points. A standard deviation Z-test demonstrated the decrease in comparative compliance rates was not statistically significant at p < .05. Audit data obtained following the implementation of the QI project revealed a statistically significant improvement, which supported the hypothesis that providing education based on the PDSA model is an effective method to improve the compliance rate of appropriate olanzapine prescribing for CINV in patients receiving HEC. The result reflects the growing body of evidence confirming the validity of the PDSA model.
Adverse events (AEs) are unintended, harmful effects that occur in clinical trials, particularly in early-phase oncology clinical trials (EPOCT), where the risk of adverse effects from experimental therapies is high. Effective AE identification and management are essential for ensuring patient safety, improving outcomes, and advancing research. Advanced practice providers (APPs) play a key role in detecting and managing AEs, serving as a bridge between clinical care and research. However, their full impact on EPOCT remains underexplored. This integrative review examines existing literature on AE identification, reporting, and management in EPOCT. It explores the role of APPs in managing AEs, emphasizing their impact on patient outcomes, clinical trial efficiency, and oncology science. A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature from 2020 to 2025 was conducted using various databases. Inclusion criteria were studies addressing AE management in EPOCT, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and APP roles. Studies unrelated to oncology, AE management, or health-care providers were excluded. Findings highlight the variability in AE reporting and the growing utility of electronic PRO tools in capturing timely and accurate data. Advanced practice providers contribute significantly to outpatient AE management, reducing emergency visits and improving treatment adherence. However, challenges remain, including underreporting with clinician-based tools, lack of standardized APP training, and limited comparison to physician-led AE management. APPs serve as key players in enhancing AE reporting and improving clinical trial processes. Future research should focus on standardizing structured training programs for APPs and comparative studies assessing the effectiveness of APP-led care.
The enormous discrepancy between the incidence of disabling physical impairments among individuals with cancer and the provision of medical rehabilitation services to address these problems has once again been documented by Cheville et al in this issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. In particular, the difference between receipt of rehabilitation care during acute hospitalization and the extremely low rate for outpatients is impressive, but hardly surprising. The extent to which presence of advanced cancer has accentuated the magnitude of the differences between inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation service delivery is unclear, because similar trends would likely be found even among those with less extensive disease. In the inpatient setting, rehabilitation services such as physical and occupational therapy are often readily available, and are integral to the discharge-planning process to attain basic function sufficient for homegoing and avoid costly prolonged hospitalization. On the other hand, rehabilitation goals among outpatients are typically more varied and focused on specific impairments, such as lymphedema, contracture, motor-sensory deficits, deconditioning, and musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Active recognition of the impairments as remediable issues is required. Additional barriers not seen during inpatient care may be present, such as insurance authorization obstacles and inconvenience. The main problem, however, is that more effective systems are needed to recognize rehabilitation needs, provide rehabilitation care, and facilitate evidencebased outcomes of rehabilitation in the cancer population. Multiple studies have documented increased levels of disability among cancer patients and survivors. Yet, many gaps exist in our knowledge of how this broad-based information can be applied clinically. Which impairments justify vigilant screening? In which situations are the problems most remediable? What are best practices for treatment? How does the presence of advanced cancer affect appropriate rehabilitation management? Some cancer-related impairments, such as amputation, and conditions affecting the brain or spinal cord produce obvious and devastating clinical care needs. A wide range of treatable musculoskeletal disorders can also occur in the setting of cancer, a fact that is probably underappreciated, including among many rehabilitation practitioners. There is a need to more closely examine the extent of rehabilitation needs in historically elusive, yet common, cancer subpopulations, including those with advanced cancer. In depicting a model of rehabilitation care that has worked in a major cancer hospital, Grabois described “lessons learned,” including the need for a core triad of strong administrative support, a physiatrist as medical director of rehabilitation services, and effective marketing. Clinical service lines including inpatient, consultative, and outpatient rehabilitation should be present, as well as an emphasis on scientific productivity, and educational dimensions including medical student and resident rotations, sponsorship of seminars, and development of cancer rehabilitation fellowships. Significantly, Grabois also spoke of the real-world importance of having adequate staff capacity to minimize patient waiting times, and of maintaining a convenient location. Such a model immerses rehabilitation in the culture and workings of the facility. Despite examples such as this, integration of rehabilitation into cancer care remains problematic. In a survey of National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers, 70% of facilities reported services to treat lymphedema, but there was little discussion of other mainstream rehabilitation services. Challenges are even greater in institutions that are not dedicated cancer hospitals, where the majority of cancer patients are treated, and where rehabilitation services simultaneously need to meet the needs of other patient populations. What specific strategies can be employed to improve rehabilitation access for oncology patients? Lehmann, O’Toole, and Mosvas describe consultative models to screen oncology patients for rehabilitation needs, such as assigning rehabilitation personnel to meet regularly with the oncology team or using information such as the Karnofsky score to trigger rehabilitation assessment. However, data on long-term results of such screening systems are highly limited. Among inpatients, including those with advanced cancer, gains in functional status have been reported with both traditional acute rehabilitation and with interdisciplinary rehabilitation provided on a consultative basis, suggesting that future efforts at optimizing the rehabilitation screening process among oncology inpatients would be highly worthwhile. Among outpatients, screening presents even greater challenges. For example, do best care outcomes and cost effectiveness happen when a physiatrist sees all at-risk patients and triages the rehabilitation interventions, or when the patients go directly to other rehabilitation disciplines such as physical or occupational therapy, with physiatrist care reserved for those with the most complicated needs? Empirically, successful outpatient programs have cultivated specific service lines and consistent processes. Historically, many programs have been directed towards lymphedema and postmastectomy management, or other postsurgical issues. But there are other problems, often more global, to which there is a need to respond, especially as the evidence grows stronger. For example, because multiple studies have shown that individuals with cancer benefit from exercise programs, processes that routinely expedite exercise are needed. Areas JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY E D I T O R I A L VOLUME 26 NUMBER 16 JUNE 1 2008
Advanced practice providers (APPs), including physician associates (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), are increasingly utilized in radiation oncology. However, radiation oncology-specific training for APPs is not standardized. This study elucidates the current role of US radiation oncology APPs by assessing clinical responsibilities. Radiation oncology APPs in the US were sent a survey examining demographics, training, practice structure, and clinical tasks using the framework of the 52 entrustable professional activities (EPAs) developed by the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG). 37 PAs and 84 NPs participated. 53.7% practiced a different specialty previously. 63.6% had three or more APPs in the department, and 71.9% covered multiple physicians. 65.3% worked in a practice alongside radiation oncology residents, and 79.7% of these APPs worked directly with residents. 25.6% performed procedures. 95% completed follow-up/survivorship visits, 71% completed acute symptom visits, 65% completed ambulatory consults, 45% completed inpatient consults, and 38% completed on-treatment visits. 21.5% specialized in one disease site, 39.7% covered multiple disease sites, and 38.8% covered all disease sites. 22 of 52 ROECSG EPAs were performed by > 90% in some capacity. > 90% did not complete EPAs 15, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, and 46. Only 2.5% of APPs received formal radiation oncology training during APP education. APPs perform many ROECSG EPAs, primarily during follow-up/survivorship visits. However, job responsibilities vary widely across radiation oncology clinics. Further definition of the APP role is essential to meet the growing demands of cancer care, support the evolution of radiation oncology, and enhance patient care.
Symptom burden is the primary driver for patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) to seek medical care, whether or not they are diagnosed. This descriptive study aimed to describe the advanced practitioner (AP) and ISM patient perspective relative to the symptom burden of ISM, multidisciplinary diagnosis and management of ISM, barriers to symptom management, strategies for collaborative management of ISM, and communicative health literacy in patients with ISM. An ISM patient survey and AP survey were developed by an AP-led steering committee incorporating validated tools to measure symptom burden, symptom burden impact, barriers, and strategies for improving symptom burden. Surveys were embedded in Qualtrics and were deployed by Conexiant to a convenience sample of AP members of the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology/Oncology (APSHO), AP members of the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases, and patients affiliated with The Mast Cell Disease Society between December 22, 2024, and February 3, 2025. 50 APs and 53 ISM patients completed 100% of the questions on the corresponding surveys. The symptom burden described using the Indolent Systemic Mastocytosis Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF) to identify the symptoms that are most common, most challenging, and have the greatest impact on quality of life aligns with published data for patients in this survey. Only 24% (n = 13) of ISM patients indicated their disease was well controlled, while 76% of APs indicated greater than 50% of their ISM patients had well-controlled disease (n = 38). Most APs (68%) in the survey indicated they saw one to five ISM patients per year but were comfortable with managing ISM-related symptoms (54%, n = 27). Practice patterns for triage, multidisciplinary management, and shared decision-making are described. This is the first ISM symptom burden-focused survey to provide a direct comparison of patient responses to those of APs in hematology/oncology and allergy and immunology. Indolent systemic mastocytosis symptom burden measurement and symptom burden reduction remain challenging, with several barriers and gaps identified in this study. The APSHO Toolkit for Systemic Mastocytosis, developed in parallel to this study, provides an AP-focused resource for overcoming some of the barriers and gaps identified in this study.
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a highly effective treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, manufacturing CAR T cells can take 3 to 4 weeks, leaving patients vulnerable to disease progression during this waiting period. Bridging therapy aims to address this gap by controlling disease and improving CAR T-cell efficacy. This review summarizes the role of bridging therapy in CAR T-cell therapy for MM, focusing on the rationale and goals of bridging therapy, timing of initiation, infection risk management, selection of bridging regimens, and clinical implications, including patient education and communication. Relevant literature on CAR T-cell therapy and bridging therapy in MM was reviewed, including clinical trials and real-world data. Bridging therapy may be crucial for some patients, particularly for those with rapidly progressive disease. The optimal timing for initiating bridging therapy remains under investigation, but it can begin as soon as leukapheresis is completed. Prophylactic antibiotics or antivirals and close monitoring are essential for preventing infections during this period. The choice of bridging regimen depends on individual patient characteristics and prior therapies. Effective patient education and communication between local oncology teams and CAR T-cell centers are critical. Bridging therapy plays a vital role in optimizing CAR T-cell therapy outcomes for MM patients. Further research is needed to define the optimal use of bridging therapy in this evolving treatment landscape.
Narratives are central to the practice of medicine. However, modern health care faces numerous new demands, including increased patient loads and professional commitments, which interfere with opportunities to listen to and tell stories. These challenges can negatively impact patient care and provider burnout. Narrative medicine has been proposed as an approach to overcome these difficulties. Through implementation of this technique, engaging with illness anecdotes can become a more integral clinical focus. Its main movements are attention, reflection, and affiliation. There are multiple styles proposed for its use, although they all assist in the exploration of meaning within illness narratives. Over the past several decades, a shift toward promoting these tools has led to more research in the field. Multiple studies demonstrate the benefits to patients, providers, and caregivers. Additionally, programs are expanding to further the development of these skills. With guidance and repetition, these abilities can foster better engagement and understanding between all those involved in health care. This article discusses the various principles of narrative medicine and the benefits of its incorporation into health care, specifically in the role of oncology advanced practitioners.
Oncology advanced practitioners (OAPs) play an important role in cancer care delivery. However, leadership in clinical research remains low among OAPs. Although OAPs often participate in patient care for early-phase clinical trials, they rarely have the opportunity to lead as a principal investigator (PI), despite being capable and effective PIs when provided education and mentoring. As cancer care needs continue to increase, there is a critical need for well-trained PIs and sub-investigators (sub-Is) to evaluate novel therapeutics. To address this need, an intensive 3.5-day educational course at HonorHealth Research Institute (HRI) was developed to provide education and guidance to OAPs who desire to learn and evolve into the role of a PI in clinical trials. The course involved lectures, roundtable discussions with physicians, and protocol synopsis workshops. Participants included 21 OAPs. Participants were given questionnaires to evaluate the impact of the course and assess knowledge retention. In lectures, 65% of questions answered demonstrated improvement. In course evaluations, 100% of participants agreed that the learning objectives were met. In follow-up surveys, 63% reported they had reviewed their drafted protocol synopsis with their mentor, while the majority felt at least somewhat confident that they would be able to move forward with their protocol synopsis. Overall, participants responded favorably to the course, which successfully provided foundational knowledge for OAPs to transition into clinical research leadership positions.
Patient access to clinical trials has been identified as a key measure for delivery of quality cancer care. Effective recruitment and retention strategies remain an issue. Furthermore, clinical trial participants historically lack diversity. This project focused on advanced practice provider (APP) mentorship and paired clinical research support to enhance minority accrual to supportive care trials in Hawai'i. Over a 1-year period, a formal mentorship program for six participating APPs and three clinical research coordinators (CRCs) in the Hawai'i Minority/Underserved National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (HI M/U NCORP) was implemented. An introductory meeting kicked off the project. The APP and CRC teams then met weekly for targeted screening and accrual to supportive care trials. Monthly meetings between the mentor and teams were conducted to discuss barriers, best practices, and problem solve issues. 26 unique accruals were obtained by the APP and CRC teams over the project period while increasing minority accrual. All six APPs are now actively enrolling to trials. Four of the six participating APPs are now reviewing protocols for the HI M/U NCORP for feasibility and scientific merit. Eight of the nine participating APPs and CRCs found the intervention to be acceptable and feasible. Mentorship of APP and CRC teams can be a successful strategy in increasing accrual and participation of APPs in clinical trial activities. Measuring minority accrual based on this strategy is more complex and dependent on the APP location, clinical trial portfolio, APP patient panel and clinical interest, as well as the expertise of the APP.
Patients with cancer frequently desire to incorporate integrative oncology (IO) practices into their care. However, patients are often uncertain about how to best access safe and effective IO practices and providers. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Best Practices Committee (BPC), in collaboration with a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, sought information regarding IO practices of NCCN Member Institutions. The BPC conducted a survey of NCCN Member Institution IO practices, which was distributed via a web-based survey tool to a representative at each center. Results were compiled using descriptive statistics. Twenty-nine centers responded to the survey, with 100% of the responding institutions offering IO services. Services provided included nutritional/dietary services (97%), stress and anxiety management services (76%), mind-body practices (72%), physical therapy/occupational therapy (72%), acupressure/acupuncture (69%), and massage therapy (59%). While the mechanism for patient access varied, the most common was provider referral with some services available by self-scheduling. Twenty-one percent of centers used institutionally designed algorithms for referrals. Significant variation in funding for services existed between institutions, including combinations of self-pay, insurance-based, and philanthropically funded models. There was substantial variation in how NCCN Member Institutions deliver IO services. These results provide guidance for health-care organizations seeking to develop IO services and an opportunity to align best practices. As data were compiled solely from sites providing comprehensive cancer services, non-academic community settings may find similar implementation challenging. However, this information provides cancer providers insight into IO services most often sought by patients with cancer.
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is characterized as a nonmalignant or premalignant state whereby monoclonal immunoglobulins are detected in plasma, urine, or both. Approximately 3% to 4% of the population over the age of 50 is diagnosed with MGUS. It is estimated that 1% will progress to multiple myeloma or lymphoma over 20 years and therefore require ongoing clinical monitoring. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is categorized into three types that are determined by the paraprotein clone: immunoglobulin M (IgM) MGUS, non-IgM MGUS, and light chain MGUS. There are high-risk genetic, biochemical, and clinical factors that increase the risk of transformation to multiple myeloma or lymphoma. The incidence of MGUS is two- to threefold higher in the Black population compared with the White population, along with an earlier age of onset. Familial risk and modifiable lifestyle factors are also associated with the development of MGUS and multiple myeloma. Certain monoclonal gammopathies, known as monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS), are associated with various organs that are involved (kidney, brain, skin, lungs, liver, eyes, and heart). The most common MGCS are associated with renal and neurological abnormalities, and treatment may be considered. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary approaches to mitigate organ damage and other complications are important for the recognition and management of MGCS. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is monitored rather than treated unless there are clinical findings of progression or organ dysfunction. Ongoing research and clinical trials are essential to refine monitoring guidelines, develop targeted therapies, and explore preventive measures aimed at reducing progression to multiple myeloma and other malignancies.
We are honoured to be co-guest editors of this issue of CJNR focused on advanced practice nursing (APN). In Canada, advanced practice nurses include nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) (Canadian Nurses Association [CNA], 2008). It is fitting that CJNR is publishing this APN-focused issue given the leadership that Moyra Allen, founding editor of the Journal, demonstrated in her early writings about “the expanded role in nursing” (Allen, 1977). The research pieces and feature articles in this issue reflect the growing contribution of APN roles to the health of Canadians and highlight areas where further work is required to maximize their integration into the health-care system. NPs are “registered nurses with additional educational preparation and experience who possess and demonstrate the competencies to autonomously diagnose, order and interpret diagnostic tests, prescribe pharmaceuticals and perform specific procedures within their legislated scope of practice” (CNA, 2009b, p. 1). Those who are registered as family/all-ages or primary health care NPs typically work in the community, in settings such as community health centres, family physician offices, and long-term-care facilities, with a focus on health promotion, preventive care, diagnosis and treatment of acute common illnesses and injuries, and monitoring and management of stable chronic diseases. Those who are registered as adult, pediatrics, or neonatal NPs (also known as acute-care NPs) typically provide advanced nursing care across the continuum of acute-care services for patients who are acutely, critically, or chronically ill with complex conditions. They work in areas such as oncology, neonatology, and cardiology. In 2008, there were 1,626 licensed NPs in Canada (Canadian Institute for Health Information [CIHI], 2010). CJNR 2010, Vol. 42 No 2, 3–8
Systematic reviews are a critical tool in oncology practice to facilitate informed clinical decision-making, synthesize current research, and guide practice policy. To facilitate early exploration of a literature query or topic, Scopus Artificial Intelligence (AI), which was introduced in 2024 and is subscription-based, provides a new tool for researchers and providers to access current data or begin a systematic review topic exploration. The following article is intended to familiarize advanced practice providers (APPs) with both the recently released AI tool of Scopus AI and associated AI interface capabilities with literature search methodologies. Scopus AI is embedded within the extensive resources of Scopus, an established search engine database. Scopus AI simplifies a topic search by allowing a user to enter the question or phrase in natural language, or ordinary spoken or written language. It then translates the query into a vector and/or keyword search. Scopus AI summarizes the output results to include bullet points, numbered highlights, and conclusions. Associated citations, with internal URL links to articles embedded within the Scopus database, allow for confidence in the output summary. Pivotal or landmark study foundational document citations are also listed. The utilization of AI tools can aid APP researchers and clinicians to expedite steps in the systematic review process. Multiple tools are available to assist the researcher; Scopus AI is one of the tools that can be used to assist in streamlining specific aspects such as the initial tasks and literature search steps of the systematic review development process.