共找到 2 条结果
Statisticians and data scientists find insights that help lead to better understanding and better outcomes. When clients and managers come to us for help (and even when they don't), we want to share our advice. While we should be free to share our recommendations, we need to be clear about what the data is telling us and what is based "only on our judgment". Gelman, et. al. wrote "As we have learned from the replication crisis sweeping the biomedical and social sciences, it is frighteningly easy for motivated researchers working in isolation to arrive at favored conclusions-whether inadvertently or intentionally." One senior business leader I know said, "if you have data, great; if we're just going on intuition we can use mine". However, having data isn't enough. We need to be rigorous in our analysis to avoid finding insights that aren't supported. This paper will go through a number of examples to illustrate common mistakes.
This paper gives an overview of impersonation bots that generate output in one, or possibly, multiple modalities. We also discuss rapidly advancing areas of machine learning and artificial intelligence that could lead to frighteningly powerful new multi-modal social bots. Our main conclusion is that most commonly known bots are one dimensional (i.e., chatterbot), and far from deceiving serious interrogators. However, using recent advances in machine learning, it is possible to unleash incredibly powerful, human-like armies of social bots, in potentially well coordinated campaigns of deception and influence.