We embed buying rights into a (repeated) Arrow-Debreu model to study the long-term effects of regulation through buying rights on arising inequality. Our motivation stems from situations that typically call for regulatory interventions, such as rationing, namely, distribution crises in which demand and supply are persistently misaligned. In such settings, scarce resources tend to become increasingly concentrated among more affluent individuals, while the needs of the broader population remain unmet. While fully centralized distribution may be logistically or politically unfeasible, issuing buying rights offers a more practical alternative: they can be implemented digitally, e.g., via tokens traded on online platforms, making them significantly easier to administer. We model a scenario in which a regulator periodically distributes buying rights with the aim of promoting a more equitable allocation. Our contributions include (i) the definition of the (iterated) market where in each round the buying rights are distributed and then traded alongside the resource, (ii) the approximation algorithm of the market-clearing prices in every round, and (iii) the upper bound on \textit{frustrati
The paper is motivated by pricing decisions faced by forecourt fuel retailers across their outlets on a road network. Through our modelling approach we are able adapt the network structure to a bipartite graph with demand nodes representing volumes of fuel from customers using a specific route that connects to the seller's outlet nodes that intersect that route on the network. Customers may have their demand satisfied at the lowest priced competitor on their route. However, the seller can satisfy some or all of this demand by matching or beating this price via one of their outlets intersecting the route. We give a practical extension to min-pricing by considering a binary logit variant for buyers evaluating the choice between two sellers. We derive two MIP formulations for min-buying in the case of general demand. We also propose several constructive heuristics, based on insertion and selection operations, suitable for problem instances beyond the scope of the exact methods. The performance of models and algorithms are evaluated in a numerical study and develop insights from the results. Importantly, we are able to highlight the value of price-matching decisions under buyer demand
Resource distribution is a fundamental problem in economic and policy design, particularly when demand and supply are not naturally aligned. Without regulation, wealthier individuals may monopolize this resource, leaving the needs of others unsatisfied. While centralized distribution can ensure fairer division, it can struggle to manage logistics efficiently, and adapt to changing conditions, often leading to shortages, surpluses, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. Building on previous research on market-based redistribution, we examine a repeated hybrid market that incorporates buying rights. These rights, distributed iteratively by a central authority (for instance, as digital tokens), are intended to enhance fairness in the system - a unit of right is required to acquire a unit of the resource, but the rights themselves can also be traded alongside the resource in the market. We analyze how this regulatory mechanism influences the distribution of the scarce resource in the hybrid market over time. Unlike past works that relied on empirical methods, we explore the exact analytical properties of a system in which traders optimize over multiple rounds. We identify its market equilibr
In recent years, group buying has become one popular kind of online shopping activity, thanks to its larger sales and lower unit price. Unfortunately, research seldom focuses on recommendations specifically for group buying by now. Although some recommendation models have been proposed for group recommendation, they can not be directly used to achieve real-world group buying recommendation, due to the essential difference between group recommendation and group buying recommendation. In this paper, we first formalize the task of group buying recommendations into two sub-tasks. Then, based on our insights into the correlations and interactions between the two sub-tasks, we propose a novel recommendation model for group buying, MGBR, built mainly with a multi-task learning module. To improve recommendation performance further, we devise some collaborative expert networks and adjusted gates in the multi-task learning module, to promote the information interaction between the two sub-tasks. Furthermore, we propose two auxiliary losses corresponding to the two sub-tasks, to refine the representation learning in our model. Our extensive experiments not only demonstrate that the augmented
This study in the banking industry examines the influence of attitudinal loyalty on customer advocacy and cross buying behavior, alongside the moderating roles of Quality of Life and Corporate Social Responsibility support in the CSR fit and loyalty relationship. Employing Structural Equation Modeling, it reveals that higher attitudinal loyalty significantly boosts customer advocacy and propensity for cross buying. The findings highlight the importance of nurturing customer loyalty through valuable and relevant offerings, as CSR fit alone does not define the loyalty of the banking customer. Banks are advised to target customers with a high Quality of Life and engage with those who support CSR initiatives aligning with the banks objectives, to enhance loyalty and deepen customer relationships.
The development of the digital economy has established e-commerce platforms as the primary space for commercial transactions for the Muslim community. However, innovations in features and business models on these platforms have gave rise to Sharia issues that cannot be fully explained through conventional Fiqh Muamalah contract frameworks. This research aims to examine the compliance of transaction practices in e-commerce with Sharia principles, particularly in the six most frequently used transaction forms, namely information arbitrage-based dropshipping, Buy Now Pay Later financing schemes, digital representations, algorithmic marketing that encourages consumptive behavior, halal verification, and Pre-Order systems. The research method used is a Critical Literature Review with a normative juridical approach, through the study of arguments from the Qur'an, Hadith, DSN-MUI Fatwas, as well as classical and contemporary fiqh literature. The results show that dropshipping and PO practices are considered invalid if conducted with a direct sale contract (bai') due to the nonfulfillment of the element of possession (qabd) and the presence of high uncertainty (gharar). Both practices can
Online voting is attractive for convenience and accessibility, but is more susceptible to voter coercion and vote buying than in-person voting. One mitigation is to give voters fake voting credentials that they can yield to a coercer. Fake credentials appear identical to real ones, but cast votes that are silently omitted from the final tally. An important unanswered question is how ordinary voters perceive such a mitigation: whether they could understand and use fake credentials, and whether the coercion risks justify the costs of mitigation. We present the first systematic study of these questions, involving 150 diverse individuals in Boston, Massachusetts. All participants "registered" and "voted" in a mock election: 120 were exposed to coercion resistance via fake credentials, the rest forming a control group. Of the 120 participants exposed to fake credentials, 96% understood their use. 53% reported that they would create fake credentials in a real-world voting scenario, given the opportunity. 10% mistakenly voted with a fake credential, however. 22% reported either personal experience with or direct knowledge of coercion or vote-buying incidents. These latter participants rat
In business and marketing, analyzing the reasons behind buying is a fundamental step towards understanding consumer behaviors, shaping business strategies, and predicting market outcomes. Prior research on purchase reason has relied on surveys to gather data from users. However, this method is limited in scalability, often focusing on specific products or brands, and may not accurately represent the broader population due to the restricted number of participants involved. In our work, we propose purchase reason prediction as a novel task for modern AI models. To benchmark potential AI solutions for this new task, we first generate a dataset that consists of real-world explanations of why users make certain purchase decisions for various products. Our approach induces LLMs to explicitly distinguish between the reasons behind purchasing a product and the experience after the purchase in a user review. An automated, LLM-driven evaluation as well as a small scale human evaluation confirm the effectiveness of this approach to obtaining high-quality, personalized purchase reasons and post-purchase experiences. With this novel dataset, we are able to benchmark the purchase reason predicti
In resource buying games a set of players jointly buys a subset of a finite resource set E (e.g., machines, edges, or nodes in a digraph). The cost of a resource e depends on the number (or load) of players using e, and has to be paid completely by the players before it becomes available. Each player i needs at least one set of a predefined family S_i in 2^E to be available. Thus, resource buying games can be seen as a variant of congestion games in which the load-dependent costs of the resources can be shared arbitrarily among the players. A strategy of player i in resource buying games is a tuple consisting of one of i's desired configurations S_i together with a payment vector p_i in R^E_+ indicating how much i is willing to contribute towards the purchase of the chosen resources. In this paper, we study the existence and computational complexity of pure Nash equilibria (PNE, for short) of resource buying games. In contrast to classical congestion games for which equilibria are guaranteed to exist, the existence of equilibria in resource buying games strongly depends on the underlying structure of the S_i's and the behavior of the cost functions. We show that for marginally non-
Stochastic optimization is one of the central problems in Machine Learning and Theoretical Computer Science. In the standard model, the algorithm is given a fixed distribution known in advance. In practice though, one may acquire at a cost extra information to make better decisions. In this paper, we study how to buy information for stochastic optimization and formulate this question as an online learning problem. Assuming the learner has an oracle for the original optimization problem, we design a $2$-competitive deterministic algorithm and a $e/(e-1)$-competitive randomized algorithm for buying information. We show that this ratio is tight as the problem is equivalent to a robust generalization of the ski-rental problem, which we call super-martingale stopping. We also consider an adaptive setting where the learner can choose to buy information after taking some actions for the underlying optimization problem. We focus on the classic optimization problem, Min-Sum Set Cover, where the goal is to quickly find an action that covers a given request drawn from a known distribution. We provide an $8$-competitive algorithm running in polynomial time that chooses actions and decides when
Group buying, as an emerging form of purchase in social e-commerce websites, such as Pinduoduo, has recently achieved great success. In this new business model, users, initiator, can launch a group and share products to their social networks, and when there are enough friends, participants, join it, the deal is clinched. Group-buying recommendation for social e-commerce, which recommends an item list when users want to launch a group, plays an important role in the group success ratio and sales. However, designing a personalized recommendation model for group buying is an entirely new problem that is seldom explored. In this work, we take the first step to approach the problem of group-buying recommendation for social e-commerce and develop a GBGCN method (short for Group-Buying Graph Convolutional Network). Considering there are multiple types of behaviors (launch and join) and structured social network data, we first propose to construct directed heterogeneous graphs to represent behavioral data and social networks. We then develop a graph convolutional network model with multi-view embedding propagation, which can extract the complicated high-order graph structure to learn the e
The ultra-dense small cell networks (SCNs) have been regarded as a promising technology to solve the data traffic explosion in future. However, the complicated relationships among large scale users and cells practically demand a cooperative grouping mechanism to account for the shortage of resources in SCNs. Then, a group buying market mechanism provides a win-win situation and an effective resource allocation in the view of economics. With additional decision information being provided, the context awareness enhances and improves the group buying mechanism. In this article, we propose a Context-Aware Group Buying (CAGB) mechanism to allocate the resources in ultra-dense SCNs. The feasibility, necessity, and effectiveness of CAGB are analyzed first. Then, we introduce the group buying mechanism and some common context awareness. The relationship between context awareness and group buying is also analyzed. Some important technologies in SCNs are discussed in the view of CAGB, such as load balancing, spectrum management, and cooperative caching. Then, the graphical coalition formation games (CFGs) of CAGB are also presented to match the complicated network topologies in SCNs. Two CAG
The Walras approach to equilibrium focuses on the existence of market prices at which the total demands for goods are matched by the total supplies. Trading activities that might identify such prices by bringing agents together as potential buyers and sellers of a good are characteristically absent, however. Anyway, there is no money to pass from one to the other as ordinarily envisioned in buying and selling. Here a different approach to equilibrium -- what it should mean and how it may be achieved -- is offered as a constructive alternative. Agents operate in an economic environment where adjustments to holdings have been needed in the past, will be needed again in a changed future, and money is familiar for its role in facilitating that. Marginal utility provides relative values of goods for guidance in making incremental adjustments, and with money incorporated into utility and taken as numèraire, those values give money price thresholds at which an agent will be willing to buy or sell. Agents in pairs can then look at such individualized thresholds to see whether a trade of some amount of a good for some amount of money may be mutually advantageous in leading to higher levels
As a mediator variable, self-confidence is one of the most effective elements of the decision-making process of consumer behaviour. This research has studied the effects of different aspects of consuming fashion on the self-confidence and behaviour of consumers in Tehran's clothing market. This study has considered the acceptance of new products, interest in mode and fashion, utilitarianism, and personal taste in its analysis. This research aims to understand the fashion buying behaviour amongst Iranian consumers in consideration of their attitude towards self-confidence and aspects of fashion consumption. The statistic sample is 400 consumers from Tehran's clothing market who have been chosen based on the random availability procedure. The primary tool in this research was a questionary used to testify the assumptions and a model fit created by using structural equations and factor analysis. This research showed that the interest in mode and fashion, personal taste, utilitarianism, and new products positively impact self-confidence. In addition, the positive impact of self-confidence on fashion buying behaviour was confirmed.
The experience transfer students encounter as they navigate their journeys from community college to university is similar to that of buying a used car. We demonstrate this by showing how the information asymmetry in the market for used cars also occurs in the market for transfer students, producing inefficient markets in both cases, thereby increasing the chances of adverse selection. We diagnose the underlying conditions that produce transfer inefficiencies, identifying them as a structural inequity within the system of higher education. Finally, recommendations for alleviating information asymmetry in transfer processes, that would lead to better outcomes for transfer students, are provided.
Scale buys interpolation; structure buys a certified horizon. A world model's average error says nothing about whether a particular prediction can be trusted, or for how long. For equivariant latent world models we give a computable, multi-step certificate of the predictable horizon: $T$-step rollout error is provably constant over each symmetry orbit (Theorem A) and stratified channel-by-channel by the predictor's Lyapunov spectrum, $T_j(ε)\sim\log(1/ε)/λ_j$. The horizon is two-sided -- a matching lower bound makes approximate equivariance provably horizon-limited -- and the certificate is exclusive to structure: orbit-constant error characterizes equivariance, so no non-equivariant model has it at any scale. Empirically, on 40-D Lorenz-96 only a $\mathbb{Z}_N$-equivariant network recovers the full Lyapunov spectrum ($R^2{=}0.98$); dense and recurrent baselines fail. Because the spectrum is faithful, the certificate acts, a priori: under a fixed sensing budget a $c\times$-inflated certificate provably needs $c\times$ the budget, and the equivariant certificate meets a budget its inflated dense counterpart cannot -- with zero calibration data. The same read-out, unchanged, audits p
Advances in generative artificial intelligence, particularly agentic coding systems capable of autonomous software development, are disrupting the economics of the make-or-buy decision for enterprise applications. The "SaaSocalypse" narrative predicts that AI will render large segments of the Software-as-a-Service market obsolete by enabling firms to build software in-house at a fraction of historical cost. This paper adopts a conceptual research approach, combining transaction cost economics and the resource-based view with an assessment of current AI capabilities, to systematically re-evaluate the factors underlying the make-or-buy decision. It makes three contributions. First, it provides a factor-level analysis of how AI reshapes seven canonical decision determinants: cost, strategic differentiation, asset specificity, vendor lock-in, time-to-market, quality and compliance, and organizational capability. Second, it develops a typology of enterprise applications by their sensitivity to AI-induced shifts in make-or-buy economics. Third, it demonstrates that AI fundamentally transforms the governance properties of the Make option, shifting it from Williamson's pure hierarchy to a
Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a new frontier of digital infrastructure that can support a wide range of public-sector applications, from general purpose citizen services to specialized and sensitive state functions. When expanding AI access, governments face a set of strategic choices over whether to buy existing services, build domestic capabilities, or adopt hybrid approaches across different domains and use cases. These are critical decisions especially when leading model providers are often foreign corporations, and LLM outputs are increasingly treated as trusted inputs to public decision-making and public discourse. In practice, these decisions are not intended to mandate a single approach across all domains; instead, national AI strategies are typically pluralistic, with sovereign, commercial and open-source models coexisting to serve different purposes. Governments may rely on commercial models for non-sensitive or commodity tasks, while pursuing greater control for critical, high-risk or strategically important applications. This paper provides a strategic framework for making this decision by evaluating these options across dimensions including sovereignty, safety
Agentic AI coding tools write code with increasing autonomy and in doing so decide when to import a library and when to implement functionality from scratch. These decisions, whether to build functionality from scratch or buy into an external library, hereafter build-versus-buy, carry direct consequences for software security, licensing compliance, performance, and long-term maintainability. Yet no controlled experimental study has examined what governs build-versus-buy decisions in agentic AI coding tools. Configuration mechanisms, i.e., the means by which developers tailor agentic AI coding tool behavior to a project or workflow, are one of the primary means by which practitioners can influence these decisions. However, it is unclear which configuration mechanisms influence build-versus-buy decisions most effectively. We present a pre-registered protocol to study how configuration mechanisms alter build-versus-buy behavior in two popular agentic AI coding tools: Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. We will execute controlled programming tasks drawn from a benchmark of staged projects, each constructed around identifiable build-versus-buy points, and will manipulate the configuration sup
The phrase ``buy a quantum computer'' hides several different procurement problems. An institution may be seeking cloud access for teaching, reserved capacity for research, a local instrument for hardware training, an optimization appliance, or a strategic installation that reshapes facilities, staffing, and budgets. Because these choices differ in purpose, operating burden, and useful lifetime, the decision should be framed as acquisition of \emph{quantum capability} rather than selection of a presumed hardware winner. This manuscript develops a practical procurement framework that distinguishes five capability layers, separates peer-reviewed results from commercial offerings, pricing anchors, and public roadmaps, and compares the main commercial platform families -- superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral atoms, quantum annealing, and photonics -- through the lens of institutional fit, access model, and refresh pressure. The main conclusion is that most institutions should begin with the smallest layer of capability that produces repeatable near-term value, builds internal expertise, and preserves strategic flexibility. Large on-premises systems are justified only when mi