搜索结果：Badges

Reproducibility remains a challenge in machine learning research. While code and data availability requirements have become increasingly common, post-publication verification in journals is still limited and unformalized. This position paper argues that it is plausible for journals and conference proceedings to implement post-publication verification. We propose a modification to ACM pre-publication verification badges that allows independent researchers to submit post-publication code replications to the journal, leading to visible verification badges included in the article metadata. Each article may earn up to two badges, each linked to verified code in its corresponding public repository. We describe the motivation, related initiatives, a formal framework, the potential impact, possible limitations, and alternative views.

This paper presents a longitudinal ethical analysis of Untappd, a social drinking application that gamifies beer consumption through badges, streaks, and social sharing. Building on an exploratory study conducted in 2020, we revisit the platform in 2025 to examine how its gamification features and ethical framings have evolved. Drawing on traditional ethical theory and practical frameworks for Software Engineering, we analyze five categories of badges and their implications for user autonomy and well-being. Our findings show that, despite small adjustments and superficial disclaimers, many of the original ethical issues remain. We argue for continuous ethical reflection built embedded into software lifecycles to prevent the normalization of risky behaviors through design.

Objectives: We captured a fine-grained dataset of organic socializing with socially meaningful group labels to fill a gap in the study of face-to-face interaction. Prior interaction data from conferences, classrooms, hospitals, and workplaces exhibit network signatures such as heterogeneous contact rates, clustering, and bursty dynamics. However, schedules, room assignments, and authority roles in these settings may obscure organic social group dynamics. Studies on group mixing often rely on demographic proxies like gender, or assigned categories like school classes, rather than relationship-based groups. We aim to test if temporal network signatures from institutionally structured settings generalize to informal social interaction. Data description: We present the first, to our knowledge, public temporal proximity network dataset of a privately hosted social event, with contextual relationship-based group membership. At the outdoor cocktail hour of a wedding, 95 participants wore proximity sensor badges that detected other badge-wearers within approximately 1.5 m in 5 s intervals. The public dataset, coarsened to 10 s temporal bins, contains 7,213 contact events over 2,760 observe

Microservice is a popular software architecture that relies on decentralized teams and clear service ownership to support modularity and scalability. However, in practice, developers frequently contribute across multiple services, creating organizational coupling (OC) that gradually erodes architectural boundaries and increases coordination overhead. This study proposes a vision for behavior-driven architectural governance through gamification in microservice systems to influence developer behavior and reduce OC. Our approach introduces a gamified framework that continuously mines repository data to detect architectural boundary violations and increasing service dependencies, and translates those signals into gameful designs, including points, badges, leaderboards, and architecture improvement quests. We outline a conceptual framework that integrates repository mining, architectural metrics, and gamification mechanisms to encourage developers to maintain service boundaries and improve architectural maintainability. Furthermore, we present an evaluation roadmap to assess the impact of gamified OC governance and developer engagement. This work aims to open a new research direction at

Bioacoustic call-type classification relies on costly expert annotation. Active learning can reduce this burden by selecting a small batch of segments for expert annotation and using the labeled segments for training the classifier. The setting is hard: the target calls are extremely sparse and the call-type distribution is long-tailed, so a tight budget must be spent on the few rare, informative segments. We propose BADGE-Greedy-DPP, a deterministic batch selector that greedily adds the segment whose BADGE gradient embedding most enlarges the volume spanned by the batch; because this log-volume objective is submodular, the greedy rule guarantees a batch value at least a (1-1/e) fraction of the optimum of this objective, a guarantee not provided by BADGE's existing k-means++ and MCMC DPP sampling heuristics. There is also a temporal granularity mismatch in the task. The acquisition function scores whole segments, yet the informative frames inside them are few. Uniform averaging therefore washes them out. We show that the BADGE construction naturally addresses this mismatch when applied frame-wise, as prediction residuals weight the aggregated pseudo-gradient, so confidently predict

Artifact Evaluation (AE) is essential for ensuring the transparency and reliability of research, closing the gap between exploratory work and real-world deployment is particularly important in cybersecurity, particularly in IoT and CPSs, where large-scale, heterogeneous, and privacy-sensitive data meet safety-critical actuation. Yet, manual reproducibility checks are time-consuming and do not scale with growing submission volumes. In this work, we demonstrate that Large Language Models (LLMs) can provide powerful support for AE tasks: (i) text-based reproducibility rating, (ii) autonomous sandboxed execution environment preparation, and (iii) assessment of methodological pitfalls. Our reproducibility-assessment toolkit yields an accuracy of over 72% and autonomously sets up execution environments for 28% of runnable cybersecurity artifacts. Our automated pitfall assessment detects seven prevalent pitfalls with high accuracy ($F_1$ > 92%). Hence, the toolkit significantly reduces reviewer effort and, when integrated into established AE processes, could incentivize authors to submit higher-quality and more reproducible artifacts. IoT, CPS, and cybersecurity conferences and worksho

Artifact Evaluation (AE) has become a standard mechanism for linking software engineering papers to their supporting artifacts, but growing submission volume makes purely manual AE increasingly difficult to sustain. Although recent advances in LLM-based agents make AE automation increasingly plausible, current descriptive badge policies define badge semantics but provide no executable verification criteria, leaving both human reviewers and agents without a detailed basis for judgment. To address this gap, we construct ArtifactGuide, a structured scoring rubric grounded in ACM policy, expert-informed calibration, and artifact-based validation, and we design ArtifactCopilot, an agent collecting review evidence following a fixed sequence under ArtifactGuide and deriving the final badge decision from accumulated evidence. We evaluate our framework on 60 real artifacts from recent software engineering conferences using human-adjudicated badges as reference. The results show that ArtifactGuide improves the AE performance of coding agents over official ACM badge-policy prompts, increasing three-run mean exact badge agreement by 10.55 to 28.34 percentage points. Across all evaluated system

Product badges are ubiquitous in e-commerce platforms, acting as effective psychological triggers to nudge customers to buy specific products, boosting revenues. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no attempt to systematically study these badges and their several idiosyncrasies - we intend to close this gap in our current work. Specifically, we try to answer questions such as: How long does a product retain a badge on a given platform? If a product is sold on different platforms, then does it receive similar badges? How do the products that receive badges differ from those which do not, in terms of price, customer rating, etc. We collect longitudinal data from several e-commerce platforms over 45 days, and find that although most of the badges are short-lived, there are several permanent badge assignments and that too for badges meant to denote urgency or scarcity. Furthermore, it is unclear how the badge assignments are done, and we find evidence that highly-rated products are missing out on badges compared to lower quality ones. Our work calls for greater transparency in the badge assignment process to inform customers, as well as to reduce dissatisfaction among

Context. GitHub has introduced a new gamification element through personal achievements, whereby badges are unlocked and displayed on developers' personal profile pages in recognition of their development activities. Objective. In this paper, we present an exploratory analysis using mixed methods to study the diffusion of personal badges in GitHub, in addition to the effects and reactions to their introduction. Method. First, we conduct an observational study by mining longitudinal data from more than 6,000 developers and performed correlation and regression analysis. Then, we conduct a survey and analyze over 300 GitHub community discussions on the topic of personal badges to gauge how the community responded to the introduction of the new feature. Results. We find that most of the developers sampled own at least a badge, but we also observe an increasing number of users who choose to keep their profile private and opt out of displaying badges. Besides, badges are generally poorly correlated with developers' qualities and dispositions such as timeliness and desire to collaborate. We also find that, except for the Starstruck badge (reflecting the number of followers), their introdu

Reproducibility is a cornerstone of scientific progress, yet its state in large language model (LLM)-based software engineering (SE) research remains poorly understood. This paper presents the first large-scale, empirical study of reproducibility practices in LLM-for-SE research. We systematically mined and analyzed 640 papers published between 2017 and 2025 across premier software engineering, machine learning, and natural language processing venues, extracting structured metadata from publications, repositories, and documentation. Guided by four research questions, we examine (i) the prevalence of reproducibility smells, (ii) how reproducibility has evolved over time, (iii) whether artifact evaluation badges reliably reflect reproducibility quality, and (iv) how publication venues influence transparency practices. Using a taxonomy of seven smell categories: Code and Execution, Data, Documentation, Environment and Tooling, Versioning, Model, and Access and Legal, we manually annotated all papers and associated artifacts. Our analysis reveals persistent gaps in artifact availability, environment specification, versioning rigor, and documentation clarity, despite modest improvements

We propose AnveshanaAI, an application-based learning platform for artificial intelligence. With AnveshanaAI, learners are presented with a personalized dashboard featuring streaks, levels, badges, and structured navigation across domains such as data science, machine learning, deep learning, transformers, generative AI, large language models, and multimodal AI, with scope to include more in the future. The platform incorporates gamified tracking with points and achievements to enhance engagement and learning, while switching between Playground, Challenges, Simulator, Dashboard, and Community supports exploration and collaboration. Unlike static question repositories used in existing platforms, AnveshanaAI ensures balanced learning progression through a dataset grounded in Bloom's taxonomy, with semantic similarity checks and explainable AI techniques improving transparency and reliability. Adaptive, automated, and domain-aware assessment methods are also employed. Experiments demonstrate broad dataset coverage, stable fine-tuning with reduced perplexity, and measurable gains in learner engagement. Together, these features illustrate how AnveshanaAI integrates adaptivity, gamificat

This paper focuses on assessing the potential of micro-credentials in digitalized higher education in the era of artificial intelligence. Micro-credentials are commonly described as mini qualifications or digital badges that certify an individual competency in a specific skill or cluster of skills. Being different from traditional academic credentials in both their granularity and focus, micro-credentials represent a new and exciting topic that is rapidly gaining popularity all around the world both within higher educational institutions, such as public and private universities, as well as within other education providers, such as non-governmental organizations and SMEs. The popularity of micro-credentials has been further enhanced by the recent COVID-19 pandemic which caused digital surge in higher education leading to many rapid technological innovations and changes that were unthinkable before. The rising interest in micro-credentialing can be best demonstrated by the increase of the number of scientific publications on this topic from just 1 in 1992 to 165 in 2024. The paper employs a comprehensive bibliometric network analysis using the terms micro-credentials based on a sampl

The high-performance computing (HPC) community has adopted incentive structures to motivate reproducible research, with major conferences awarding badges to papers that meet reproducibility requirements. Yet, many papers do not meet such requirements. The uniqueness of HPC infrastructure and software, coupled with strict access requirements, may limit opportunities for reproducibility. In the absence of resource access, we believe that regular documented testing, through continuous integration (CI), coupled with complete provenance information, can be used as a substitute. Here, we argue that better HPC-compliant CI solutions will improve reproducibility of applications. We present a survey of reproducibility initiatives and describe the barriers to reproducibility in HPC. To address existing limitations, we present a GitHub Action, CORRECT, that enables secure execution of tests on remote HPC resources. We evaluate CORRECT's usability across three different types of HPC applications, demonstrating the effectiveness of using CORRECT for automating and documenting reproducibility evaluations.