I introduce a new family of axioms extending ZFC set theory, the $Σ_n$-correct forcing axioms. These assert roughly that whenever a forcing name $\dot{a}$ can be forced by a poset in some forcing class $Γ$ to have some $Σ_n$ property $φ$ which is provably preserved by all further forcing in $Γ$, then $\dot{a}$ reflects to some small name such that there is already in $V$ a filter which interprets that small name so that $φ$ holds. $Σ_1$-correct forcing axioms turn out to be equivalent to classical forcing axioms, while $Σ_2$-correct forcing axioms for $Σ_2$-definable forcing classes are consistent relative to a supercompact cardinal (and in fact hold in the standard model of a classical forcing axiom constructed as an extension of a model with a supercompact), $Σ_3$-correct forcing axioms are consistent relative to an extendible cardinal, and more generally $Σ_n$-correct forcing axioms are consistent relative to a hierarchy of large cardinals generalizing supercompactness and extendibility whose supremum is the first-order version of Vopenka's Principle. By analogy to classical forcing axioms, there is also a hierarchy of $Σ_n$-correct bounded forcing axioms which are consistent re
使用 AI 将内容摘要翻译为中文,便于快速阅读
使用 AI 分析这篇文章的核心发现、关键要点和深度见解
由 DeepSeek AI 提供分析 · 首次使用需配置 API Key